| They’re at it again… 10:20 - Sep 7 with 14548 views | abracaDOBRA_ |
Me me me!!! |  | | |  |
| They’re at it again… on 13:47 - Sep 7 with 1555 views | Stu_Magoo |
I still want to see the Anchorman-esque fight between all the various podcast gangs tbh.
Somebody take Crunchers mother for a nice steak dinner then never call her again. |  | | |
| They’re at it again… on 14:04 - Sep 7 with 1487 views | NthQldITFC |
| They’re at it again… on 11:11 - Sep 7 by portmanking |
Quite. It's all geared towards this 'Best Influencer' vote.
But then again, as Bedsheet himself says, it's only my opinion. |
Is someone an 'influencer' who follows more people on Twitter than has followers, or am I missing the point? |  |
| # WE ARE STEALING THE FUTURE FROM OUR CHILDREN --- WE MUST CHANGE COURSE # | | Poll: | It's driving me nuts |
| |
| They’re at it again… on 14:04 - Sep 7 with 1485 views | xrayspecs |
| They’re at it again… on 11:38 - Sep 7 by itfcjoe |
I can only talk from my view, as a podcaster, but if one of their collective was doing something publicly that tarnished name and could cause long lasting damage I wouldn't be having a slanging match in public about it.
Without being too social media he said she said, Cruncher retweeted this before there was the big backlash and it was posted on here |
The very definition of unprofessional.
I would add naive as well. |  | | |
| They’re at it again… on 14:18 - Sep 7 with 1411 views | davblue |
| They’re at it again… on 13:47 - Sep 7 by Stu_Magoo |
I still want to see the Anchorman-esque fight between all the various podcast gangs tbh.
Somebody take Crunchers mother for a nice steak dinner then never call her again. |
**Seafood Dinner |  | | |
| They’re at it again… on 14:40 - Sep 7 with 1327 views | davblue |
| They’re at it again… on 12:17 - Sep 7 by Illinoisblue |
People would be queuing up to smash that subscribe button! |
12,000 by lunchtime tomorrow. | | | |
| They’re at it again… on 14:50 - Sep 7 with 1307 views | J2BLUE |
Not sure why they would ask someone to represent the fan base when most of the fan base who know of him would not want him representing us. |  |
| |
| They’re at it again… on 14:59 - Sep 7 with 1278 views | Dyland |
| They’re at it again… on 11:28 - Sep 7 by bluesince84 |
In fairness this is Matt, not the cruncher or Martin, I can assure you they are absolutely livid at this , whether you like them or not , and each of those opinions is fair , they have done a hell of a lot for fans , buying season tickets , getting behind the popr campaign , raising money for fans to get to the game. Are they polarising , yes , but they also do massive work for the fan base , but this particular tweet … I’d ask you to look at talking towns response to it . They are as disgusted as I’m sure we all are . |
If this Cruncher fella is the same person as Rich or was involved in any way with the Magic bedsheet frolic, he's one of the last people I'd want representing me as a Town supporter. He encapsulates everything the silent (not active on twitter 24/7) majority hate about footy social media, and is the embodiment of 'cult of the amateur'. If this kind of antics is the future of broadcast and media we are truly fooked.... thankfully it's proving not to be cos professional acting pundits and commentators, from ones with zero previous experience to the cream of traditional journalism, are there as well.
I'm sure this lot have done some good stuff, which is of course good. The action is the reward itself though, going on about good deeds you've done ad nauseum usually means you did it for self-aggrandisement. That negates your worthiness I'm afraid. The rest of us do good deeds without needing smoke blown up our arses. |  |
| |
| They’re at it again… on 15:02 - Sep 7 with 1240 views | clive_baker |
| They’re at it again… on 14:59 - Sep 7 by Dyland |
If this Cruncher fella is the same person as Rich or was involved in any way with the Magic bedsheet frolic, he's one of the last people I'd want representing me as a Town supporter. He encapsulates everything the silent (not active on twitter 24/7) majority hate about footy social media, and is the embodiment of 'cult of the amateur'. If this kind of antics is the future of broadcast and media we are truly fooked.... thankfully it's proving not to be cos professional acting pundits and commentators, from ones with zero previous experience to the cream of traditional journalism, are there as well.
I'm sure this lot have done some good stuff, which is of course good. The action is the reward itself though, going on about good deeds you've done ad nauseum usually means you did it for self-aggrandisement. That negates your worthiness I'm afraid. The rest of us do good deeds without needing smoke blown up our arses. |
+1
nft |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| They’re at it again… on 15:09 - Sep 7 with 1215 views | GlasgowBlue |
| They’re at it again… on 10:58 - Sep 7 by Big_Jase |
In fairness to Richard, it’s not him whose moaning about this, it’s Matt Phillips. |
The other two are cutting him adrift now.
|  |
| |
| They’re at it again… on 15:10 - Sep 7 with 1207 views | Kieran_Knows |
| They’re at it again… on 15:09 - Sep 7 by GlasgowBlue |
The other two are cutting him adrift now.
|
As per the thread, Cruncher initially retweeted as is now massively back tracking. |  |
| |
| They’re at it again… on 15:11 - Sep 7 with 1203 views | hype313 |
| They’re at it again… on 15:09 - Sep 7 by GlasgowBlue |
The other two are cutting him adrift now.
|
Cruncher originally retweeted Matts initial tweet then deleted it when the heat hit. |  |
| |
| They’re at it again… on 15:15 - Sep 7 with 1182 views | GlasgowBlue |
| They’re at it again… on 11:38 - Sep 7 by itfcjoe |
I can only talk from my view, as a podcaster, but if one of their collective was doing something publicly that tarnished name and could cause long lasting damage I wouldn't be having a slanging match in public about it.
Without being too social media he said she said, Cruncher retweeted this before there was the big backlash and it was posted on here |
I listen to all of the pods, and other than some bloke sneezing down the mic and scaring the bejesus out of me, Blue Monday is the gold standard.
Talking Town has a more tabloid style and there is nothing wrong with that. Cruncher plays the pantomime villain well and at least he has some passion. But Matt Phillips is the most annoying presenter out there. I turn off half the time when he's on. He doesn't seem to have much knowledge of the club or the players and comes across like an over excited schoolby. IMO or course. | |
| |
| They’re at it again… on 15:19 - Sep 7 with 1143 views | GlasgowBlue |
| They’re at it again… on 15:11 - Sep 7 by hype313 |
Cruncher originally retweeted Matts initial tweet then deleted it when the heat hit. |
Ha! Cruncher should be in the Tory party. | |
| |
| They’re at it again… on 15:27 - Sep 7 with 1094 views | ellaandred |
| They’re at it again… on 14:59 - Sep 7 by Dyland |
If this Cruncher fella is the same person as Rich or was involved in any way with the Magic bedsheet frolic, he's one of the last people I'd want representing me as a Town supporter. He encapsulates everything the silent (not active on twitter 24/7) majority hate about footy social media, and is the embodiment of 'cult of the amateur'. If this kind of antics is the future of broadcast and media we are truly fooked.... thankfully it's proving not to be cos professional acting pundits and commentators, from ones with zero previous experience to the cream of traditional journalism, are there as well.
I'm sure this lot have done some good stuff, which is of course good. The action is the reward itself though, going on about good deeds you've done ad nauseum usually means you did it for self-aggrandisement. That negates your worthiness I'm afraid. The rest of us do good deeds without needing smoke blown up our arses. |
Is that the same bloke that phoned Suffolk every week, after every game ? | | | |
| They’re at it again… on 15:32 - Sep 7 with 1089 views | Mediocre_Quick |
Going to keep this same energy with ITFC southwest @ing the owners of the club for their achievements and funds raised? Or just go after 1 set of fans because it meets your agenda against them? |  | | |
| They’re at it again… on 15:32 - Sep 7 with 1084 views | The_Romford_Blue |
I always said that that melt was worse than cruncher. Just because he has a blue tick makes him think he can talk however he wants to people. |  |
| |
| They’re at it again… on 15:38 - Sep 7 with 1037 views | abracaDOBRA_ |
| They’re at it again… on 15:32 - Sep 7 by Mediocre_Quick |
Going to keep this same energy with ITFC southwest @ing the owners of the club for their achievements and funds raised? Or just go after 1 set of fans because it meets your agenda against them? |
That's completely irrelevant and different. One's coming for a radio show (has come for TWTD, EADT, most fans) because theyve invited another pod member on it, and not them.
ITFC South west have raised money and tagged the owners, so what? They're hardly having an argument on who donated what, how much, who started it.
Plus, I don't seem to see their tweet your referring too?
figured out who you are on twitter from this response though, which was fun [Post edited 7 Sep 2022 15:41]
| | | |
| They’re at it again… on 15:44 - Sep 7 with 997 views | Mediocre_Quick |
| They’re at it again… on 15:38 - Sep 7 by abracaDOBRA_ |
That's completely irrelevant and different. One's coming for a radio show (has come for TWTD, EADT, most fans) because theyve invited another pod member on it, and not them.
ITFC South west have raised money and tagged the owners, so what? They're hardly having an argument on who donated what, how much, who started it.
Plus, I don't seem to see their tweet your referring too?
figured out who you are on twitter from this response though, which was fun [Post edited 7 Sep 2022 15:41]
|
Good for you to figure out who I am on Twitter 👠want a medal for it?
It is relevant because it’s the same thing is it not? Attention seeking and what not? Which is what you’ve accused TT Matt Phillips of doing, I even tweeted him to have a wee pop and tell him he was being an idiot | | | |
| They’re at it again… on 15:44 - Sep 7 with 989 views | Steve_M |
| They’re at it again… on 15:38 - Sep 7 by abracaDOBRA_ |
That's completely irrelevant and different. One's coming for a radio show (has come for TWTD, EADT, most fans) because theyve invited another pod member on it, and not them.
ITFC South west have raised money and tagged the owners, so what? They're hardly having an argument on who donated what, how much, who started it.
Plus, I don't seem to see their tweet your referring too?
figured out who you are on twitter from this response though, which was fun [Post edited 7 Sep 2022 15:41]
|
Well quite, one is inclusive and one is excluding other fans to big themselves up which is a big difference.
It's a large part of the reason why Blue Action has been a far greater success than Section Six were back in t he day. |  |
| |
| They’re at it again… on 15:44 - Sep 7 with 985 views | abracaDOBRA_ |
| They’re at it again… on 15:44 - Sep 7 by Mediocre_Quick |
Good for you to figure out who I am on Twitter 👠want a medal for it?
It is relevant because it’s the same thing is it not? Attention seeking and what not? Which is what you’ve accused TT Matt Phillips of doing, I even tweeted him to have a wee pop and tell him he was being an idiot |
Wheres this tweet then from ITFC south west as i cant seem to find it? | | | |
| They’re at it again… on 15:46 - Sep 7 with 975 views | SlippinJimmyJuan |
| They’re at it again… on 10:30 - Sep 7 by abracaDOBRA_ |
It's proper virtue signalling. Only do something so people know about it and for the attention.
Most decent people quietly donate, like the link I put on here yesterday to it. I'm sure a lot donated something and didn't even post on the thread that they had done. |
Yes, whenever a friend or a friend of a friend has some kind of fundraiser, I always feel too embarrassed to leave my name and instead opt for anonymous. This then leads people to ask about sponsorship again at a later point at which point I confess my madness and feel even more embarrassed, which might be the most British thing ever. | |
| |
| They’re at it again… on 15:47 - Sep 7 with 973 views | clive_baker |
| They’re at it again… on 15:44 - Sep 7 by abracaDOBRA_ |
Wheres this tweet then from ITFC south west as i cant seem to find it? |
There was a tweet mentioning £600 had been raised, but as you say it's not in the slightest bit comparable to wetting the bed over not getting interviewed on the radio because "it was our idea" (it wasn't).
Chalk & cheese. | |
| |
| They’re at it again… on 15:48 - Sep 7 with 1063 views | Kieran_Knows |
| They’re at it again… on 15:44 - Sep 7 by Mediocre_Quick |
Good for you to figure out who I am on Twitter 👠want a medal for it?
It is relevant because it’s the same thing is it not? Attention seeking and what not? Which is what you’ve accused TT Matt Phillips of doing, I even tweeted him to have a wee pop and tell him he was being an idiot |
Afternoon Rich. | |
| |
| They’re at it again… on 15:49 - Sep 7 with 1590 views | Mediocre_Quick |
| They’re at it again… on 15:44 - Sep 7 by abracaDOBRA_ |
Wheres this tweet then from ITFC south west as i cant seem to find it? |
It’s from who I assume is the account owner
| | | |
| They’re at it again… on 15:50 - Sep 7 with 1567 views | jaykay |
| They’re at it again… on 11:28 - Sep 7 by bluesince84 |
In fairness this is Matt, not the cruncher or Martin, I can assure you they are absolutely livid at this , whether you like them or not , and each of those opinions is fair , they have done a hell of a lot for fans , buying season tickets , getting behind the popr campaign , raising money for fans to get to the game. Are they polarising , yes , but they also do massive work for the fan base , but this particular tweet … I’d ask you to look at talking towns response to it . They are as disgusted as I’m sure we all are . |
but the so called cruncher  retweeted it then saw the backlash and quickly deleted it |  |
| forensic experts say footers and spruces fingerprints were not found at the scene after the weekends rows |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
