| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong 10:27 - Aug 6 with 9972 views | le2blue |
Though Southampton have decided to keep him. |  | | |  |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:28 - Aug 6 with 6054 views | BcarefulwhatUWish4 |
Seems highly unlikely |  | | |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:33 - Aug 6 with 5941 views | Keno |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:28 - Aug 6 by BcarefulwhatUWish4 |
Seems highly unlikely |
As likely as me spending the night with Lily James, Jenna Coleman and the English womans netball team |  |
| |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:34 - Aug 6 with 5925 views | Herbivore |
I can't imagine a world in which we'd pay £8m for Adam Armstrong and cover his PL wages. |  |
| |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:34 - Aug 6 with 5911 views | J2BLUE |
I doubt it. |  |
| |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:36 - Aug 6 with 5881 views | phillymark |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:33 - Aug 6 by Keno |
As likely as me spending the night with Lily James, Jenna Coleman and the English womans netball team |
 |  | | |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:41 - Aug 6 with 5794 views | IP1Blue |
Ashton says he’s expecting a transfer domino effect once ‘newly relegated sides start selling players’ yesterday.
Today we’re linked with one of there players.
Either we are interested in them and words match up to action or agents just listening in to what he is saying to try and gear up a move away elsewhere - I think we all know it is most likely the latter | | | |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:46 - Aug 6 with 5705 views | Keno |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:36 - Aug 6 by phillymark |
|
obviously that may be a bit unrealistic, the netball team have a big game coming up | |
| |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:47 - Aug 6 with 5683 views | Herbivore |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:46 - Aug 6 by Keno |
obviously that may be a bit unrealistic, the netball team have a big game coming up |
I'm sure they've got a spare 30 seconds. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:48 - Aug 6 with 5671 views | BlueBadger |
Why do people still share Nixon links as if he's an oracle?
Only time he's ever actually ITK is when he's nicked ir from someone genuinely ITK who's broken the story a day or two before. |  |
| |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:52 - Aug 6 with 5622 views | Wacko |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:41 - Aug 6 by IP1Blue |
Ashton says he’s expecting a transfer domino effect once ‘newly relegated sides start selling players’ yesterday.
Today we’re linked with one of there players.
Either we are interested in them and words match up to action or agents just listening in to what he is saying to try and gear up a move away elsewhere - I think we all know it is most likely the latter |
I don't understand Ashton's comments. Newly relegated clubs have already sold players... one of them to us! | |
| |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:52 - Aug 6 with 5610 views | Keno |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:48 - Aug 6 by BlueBadger |
Why do people still share Nixon links as if he's an oracle?
Only time he's ever actually ITK is when he's nicked ir from someone genuinely ITK who's broken the story a day or two before. |
you spelt orifice wrong | |
| |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:55 - Aug 6 with 5565 views | Keno |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:47 - Aug 6 by Herbivore |
I'm sure they've got a spare 30 seconds. |
is that each or as a team? | |
| |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:55 - Aug 6 with 5561 views | Herbivore |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:52 - Aug 6 by Wacko |
I don't understand Ashton's comments. Newly relegated clubs have already sold players... one of them to us! |
The relegated clubs still have players in their squads that you'd expect to end up in the Prem by the end of the window. That movement will then free up other deals to take place. | |
| |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 11:02 - Aug 6 with 5465 views | FrimleyBlue |
Lol 8 mill
Do these people not understand ffp.
When we begin selling players for 10+ mill then you might see Coventry level spending. Until then. No chance. Thats not a negative. Just obvious isn't it? |  |
| |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 11:03 - Aug 6 with 5452 views | Herbivore |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:55 - Aug 6 by Keno |
is that each or as a team? |
The whole team. Let's not kid ourselves here, Keno. | |
| |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 11:04 - Aug 6 with 5450 views | pointofblue |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:52 - Aug 6 by Wacko |
I don't understand Ashton's comments. Newly relegated clubs have already sold players... one of them to us! |
Perhaps we're looking at a Hirst equivalent from a Premier side but they're looking to bring in a player from a relegated side before letting them go. As an example, and not saying we're linked for a moment, West Ham have agreed in principle to sell or loan us Conor Coventry but won't let him go until they sign a replacement, with Moyes reportedly interested in Ward-Prowse. | |
| |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 11:05 - Aug 6 with 5428 views | Keno |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 11:03 - Aug 6 by Herbivore |
The whole team. Let's not kid ourselves here, Keno. |
I can dream | |
| |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 11:09 - Aug 6 with 5356 views | pointofblue |
As an aside, if we’re really planning to spend up to £8m for Armstrong, why didn’t we outbid Coventry for Simms (I think reportedly £7m) and, at the very least, drive the price up. | |
| |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 11:11 - Aug 6 with 5326 views | ghostofescobar |
Just can’t see up paying anything like 8mill for a player. Would blow my tiny little mind if we did. Despite the “money bags” tag some throw at us, I think we’ve been relatively frugal on most of our signings so far. |  |
| |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 11:17 - Aug 6 with 5259 views | portmanking |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 11:09 - Aug 6 by pointofblue |
As an aside, if we’re really planning to spend up to £8m for Armstrong, why didn’t we outbid Coventry for Simms (I think reportedly £7m) and, at the very least, drive the price up. |
Ridiculous comparison.
Simms is completely untested in comparison to Armstrong. You'd understand why market value for Armstrong is twice Simms' value given his history at this level. If Simms is really worth 8m, you could argue Armstrong is eight figures comfortably. | | | |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 11:17 - Aug 6 with 5255 views | tractorboy1978 |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 11:09 - Aug 6 by pointofblue |
As an aside, if we’re really planning to spend up to £8m for Armstrong, why didn’t we outbid Coventry for Simms (I think reportedly £7m) and, at the very least, drive the price up. |
Maybe we didn't really want him 'that much'. Ashton said McKenna has said 'no that isn't right for us' a couple of times this summer.
It might not be Armstrong and might not be £8m, but I am pretty sure we are going to see the biggest fee paid by GC by quite a distance before the end of this window. | | | |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 11:18 - Aug 6 with 5239 views | PrideOfTheEast |
He’s weeks out of date. | | | |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 11:22 - Aug 6 with 5134 views | Kieran_Knows |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 10:48 - Aug 6 by BlueBadger |
Why do people still share Nixon links as if he's an oracle?
Only time he's ever actually ITK is when he's nicked ir from someone genuinely ITK who's broken the story a day or two before. |
Oh shut up. |  |
| |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 11:26 - Aug 6 with 5069 views | LankHenners |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 11:09 - Aug 6 by pointofblue |
As an aside, if we’re really planning to spend up to £8m for Armstrong, why didn’t we outbid Coventry for Simms (I think reportedly £7m) and, at the very least, drive the price up. |
They paid about half that for Simms at most, add-ons will take it towards that figure. We just felt that was too much whereas Coventry could afford to push the boat out a bit more having sold Gyokeres for about £20 million. |  |
| |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 11:29 - Aug 6 with 5004 views | pointofblue |
| Nixon still thinks we’re after Adam Armstrong on 11:26 - Aug 6 by LankHenners |
They paid about half that for Simms at most, add-ons will take it towards that figure. We just felt that was too much whereas Coventry could afford to push the boat out a bit more having sold Gyokeres for about £20 million. |
Thanks. If we thought that was too much for Simms then surely the internal thinking is £8m is approaching ridiculous for Armstrong. Unless it’s £1m upfront and £7m on promotion to the top tier! | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
