| Hypothetical penalty question 18:26 - Apr 11 with 1335 views | Keno |
Just imagine we actually get a dubious penalty awarded which if scored secured promoted
Who would want you to take? [Post edited 11 Apr 18:32]
|  |
| |  |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 18:28 - Apr 11 with 1316 views | MK1 |
Me. |  | | |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 18:32 - Apr 11 with 1282 views | Keno |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 18:28 - Apr 11 by MK1 |
Me. |
Are you Tommy Miller or John Wark? | |
| |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 18:34 - Apr 11 with 1276 views | mutters |
All time, Matt Le Tisser
Current, Haaland |  |
| |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 18:36 - Apr 11 with 1266 views | MK1 |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 18:32 - Apr 11 by Keno |
Are you Tommy Miller or John Wark? |
No, but I was a match day mascot years ago and scored a penalty against Paul Cooper. He was the penalty saving king of his time and he didn't get anywhere near it. [Post edited 11 Apr 18:42]
| | | |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 18:46 - Apr 11 with 1230 views | Zx1988 |
Was discussing this with a chum last night. I've got a terrible terrible feeling that we'll get a penalty as the last kick of the Huddersfield game, with the scores level and needing a win to secure automatic promotion. Leeds' and Leicester's matches will have already finished, so it really would be a case of promotion being decided by a single kick.
The complicating factor would most likely be that the 'starters' would have left the pitch, and the taker would have to be chosen from the 'finishers'. Depending on recoveries, perhaps this would mean one of Moore or Hirst would still be on the pitch, in which case I'd give it to whichever of them has come on.
It's tough to say, otherwise. I'm assuming a likely pool, from the attackers, of Al Hamadi, Jackson, Hutchinson, Harness, or Sarmiento? Perhaps Jackson from that lot?
Otherwise I'd maybe go a little left-field with either Taylor or Davis.
It's a good question! |  |
| |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 18:51 - Apr 11 with 1212 views | FrimleyBlue |
Morsy. |  |
| |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 18:55 - Apr 11 with 1207 views | TrumptonBlue |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 18:46 - Apr 11 by Zx1988 |
Was discussing this with a chum last night. I've got a terrible terrible feeling that we'll get a penalty as the last kick of the Huddersfield game, with the scores level and needing a win to secure automatic promotion. Leeds' and Leicester's matches will have already finished, so it really would be a case of promotion being decided by a single kick.
The complicating factor would most likely be that the 'starters' would have left the pitch, and the taker would have to be chosen from the 'finishers'. Depending on recoveries, perhaps this would mean one of Moore or Hirst would still be on the pitch, in which case I'd give it to whichever of them has come on.
It's tough to say, otherwise. I'm assuming a likely pool, from the attackers, of Al Hamadi, Jackson, Hutchinson, Harness, or Sarmiento? Perhaps Jackson from that lot?
Otherwise I'd maybe go a little left-field with either Taylor or Davis.
It's a good question! |
Jackson's penalty success rate for Town is 0 from 2, so I'd rather it wasn't him. |  | | |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 19:00 - Apr 11 with 1186 views | iamatractorboy |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 18:34 - Apr 11 by mutters |
All time, Matt Le Tisser
Current, Haaland |
Ivan Toney. I'd be willing to bet he would score. And so would he. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Hypothetical penalty question on 19:04 - Apr 11 with 1172 views | MK1 |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 18:46 - Apr 11 by Zx1988 |
Was discussing this with a chum last night. I've got a terrible terrible feeling that we'll get a penalty as the last kick of the Huddersfield game, with the scores level and needing a win to secure automatic promotion. Leeds' and Leicester's matches will have already finished, so it really would be a case of promotion being decided by a single kick.
The complicating factor would most likely be that the 'starters' would have left the pitch, and the taker would have to be chosen from the 'finishers'. Depending on recoveries, perhaps this would mean one of Moore or Hirst would still be on the pitch, in which case I'd give it to whichever of them has come on.
It's tough to say, otherwise. I'm assuming a likely pool, from the attackers, of Al Hamadi, Jackson, Hutchinson, Harness, or Sarmiento? Perhaps Jackson from that lot?
Otherwise I'd maybe go a little left-field with either Taylor or Davis.
It's a good question! |
If I am not going to be immortalized into Ipswich folk law, then I guess I want Clarke or Woolfenden to go down in Town history. | | | |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 20:00 - Apr 11 with 1084 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 18:46 - Apr 11 by Zx1988 |
Was discussing this with a chum last night. I've got a terrible terrible feeling that we'll get a penalty as the last kick of the Huddersfield game, with the scores level and needing a win to secure automatic promotion. Leeds' and Leicester's matches will have already finished, so it really would be a case of promotion being decided by a single kick.
The complicating factor would most likely be that the 'starters' would have left the pitch, and the taker would have to be chosen from the 'finishers'. Depending on recoveries, perhaps this would mean one of Moore or Hirst would still be on the pitch, in which case I'd give it to whichever of them has come on.
It's tough to say, otherwise. I'm assuming a likely pool, from the attackers, of Al Hamadi, Jackson, Hutchinson, Harness, or Sarmiento? Perhaps Jackson from that lot?
Otherwise I'd maybe go a little left-field with either Taylor or Davis.
It's a good question! |
I think Moore is probably our first choice taker at the moment. I reckon Hirst may well be second choice on them once fit too. I would certainly trust either of them (although anyone can still miss and if it was that scenario it would be extraordinary pressure). |  |
| |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 20:37 - Apr 11 with 1020 views | Stewart27 |
Davis or Morsy.
As they are the ones I’d pick who would likely be finishing the game. | | | |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 20:51 - Apr 11 with 999 views | Illinoisblue |
Wolfy. Panenka. |  |
| |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 21:11 - Apr 11 with 952 views | southnorfolkblue |
Morsy.
For such a clean striker of the ball, Chaplins penalties aren’t great. In a massive moment I’d want our leader to take responsibility | |
| |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 21:52 - Apr 11 with 871 views | itfc_bucks |
Morsy.
He's the only one I'd have absolute faith in having enough bottle to take it to the best of his ability. | | | |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 21:59 - Apr 11 with 860 views | J2BLUE |
Chaplin. |  |
| |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 09:54 - Apr 12 with 623 views | Garv |
Hate to say it but not Chaplin.
Broadhead. |  |
| |
| Larsen Toure on 09:57 - Apr 12 with 615 views | Dyland |
For sure. |  |
| |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 12:09 - Apr 12 with 550 views | Reus30 |
Morsy would be my number 1 but Jack Taylor would also be right up there if he was on the pitch. Jezza would be 3rd.
As much as I would love Clarke to step up and smash it in, imagine the pressure!
Edit - changed my mind. Gotta be Jez for the scenes! [Post edited 12 Apr 12:13]
|  | | |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 12:10 - Apr 12 with 547 views | jayessess |
I think the current player I'd have most confidence in would be Kieffer Moore. |  |
| |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 12:25 - Apr 12 with 512 views | tractorboy1978 |
Taylor. Best/cleanest striker of the ball we have. Couldn't believe he didn't take the one against Bristol City. [Post edited 12 Apr 12:25]
| | | |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 12:27 - Apr 12 with 497 views | billlm |
Broadhead, |  | | |
| Hypothetical penalty question on 13:19 - Apr 12 with 415 views | Vegtablue |
A Clarke - Woolf effort in the mould of Pires - Henry. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
