article on Harry Clarke on 20:58 - Mar 13 with 1894 views | redrickstuhaart | It seems to be made up for clicks and written by AI or someone who doesn't speak proper English. | | | |
article on Harry Clarke on 20:59 - Mar 13 with 1887 views | BondiBlue | Only skim-read it but i think if he keeps improving at the rate he has this season, he'll be a good premier league player. Technically good, strong, quick, great engine, and aggressive. Not short of confidence. Love him. | |
| |
article on Harry Clarke on 21:33 - Mar 13 with 1755 views | Illinoisblue | The worst article in the history of the internet. Every sentence a stinking turd. Other than that, good effort. | |
| |
article on Harry Clarke on 07:30 - Mar 14 with 1254 views | thebooks | As the other poster points out, that is AI-generated fluff which barely makes sense. Absolute waste of everyone’s time. | | | |
article on Harry Clarke on 08:53 - Mar 14 with 1108 views | The_Flashing_Smile | Absolute nonsense. If it's not written by AI, as others are suggesting, then "Kelan Sarson" hasn't ever watched Ipswich play and has merely looked at some stats and footballtransfers.com. They say we've missed Clarke, with Tuanzebe filling in at right back... neglecting to mention that just one home game earlier Tuanzebe was man-of-the-match. And if they'd watched us, or done even slightly more research, they'd realise the valuation of Leif Davis at £4.4m is ridiculous. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
article on Harry Clarke on 09:09 - Mar 14 with 1064 views | CrockerITFC | McKenna should "bin" Kelan Sarson, if he's to bin anyone. I've seen better reporting on Look Norwich...what a load of cr@p | | | |
article on Harry Clarke on 10:06 - Mar 14 with 962 views | FrimleyBlue | Quite an odd article They share a few thoughts that could be discussed.. I.E the differences between Clarke and Tuenzebe, but they overplay it by minimising Tuenzebe's actual performances which have been fairly solid overall imo. Transfer wise, I can't agree he's worth more than Davis, however I'm not involved in transfer fee negotiations, when we look at Davis and Clarke and compare the two, both i'd say aren't the most solid defensively, but both offer more going forwards - but with this, Davis is clearly better with the ball in this respect..much better So are they basing transfer fee's solely on defensive contribution? i've no idea stat wise how the two compare.. does anyone? Age wise, there's only 2 years between the two, so that shouldn't really come into it much. | |
| |
article on Harry Clarke on 10:40 - Mar 14 with 885 views | Swansea_Blue | Hmm. No totally convinced with the argument that he's our most valuable asset. I like him, but that's a bit OTT. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
article on Harry Clarke on 11:03 - Mar 14 with 829 views | Guthrum |
article on Harry Clarke on 10:06 - Mar 14 by FrimleyBlue | Quite an odd article They share a few thoughts that could be discussed.. I.E the differences between Clarke and Tuenzebe, but they overplay it by minimising Tuenzebe's actual performances which have been fairly solid overall imo. Transfer wise, I can't agree he's worth more than Davis, however I'm not involved in transfer fee negotiations, when we look at Davis and Clarke and compare the two, both i'd say aren't the most solid defensively, but both offer more going forwards - but with this, Davis is clearly better with the ball in this respect..much better So are they basing transfer fee's solely on defensive contribution? i've no idea stat wise how the two compare.. does anyone? Age wise, there's only 2 years between the two, so that shouldn't really come into it much. |
I'm suspicious of some of his stats. In another article, he claims we are paying £65k per week for Brandon Williams' services. I doubt he was even on that much at ManU. This taken (uncritically) from some very jubbly website which also puts Tuanzebe on £20k, Moore on £15k and thinks we're paying virtually all our permanent signings way under £10k pw. | |
| |
| |