| FFP relief 23:46 - Jan 1 with 1335 views | HalifaxBlue |
I'm not familiar with the intricacies of FFP regulations - is there any way to make some more room as Hirst has a long term injury? Would we have to de-register him?
This window is going to require some real gymnastics I fear. |  |
| |  |
| FFP relief on 00:09 - Jan 2 with 1272 views | unstableblue |
You can’t take Hirst’s wages off the salary expenditure
So no room there
Room is going to come from the probably larger than expected home gates; and extra revenue items such as Town TV matchday passes. Which I’m sure are high.
The club could gamble on the revenue from playoff semis - gates and TV revenue. |  |
| |
| FFP relief on 00:35 - Jan 2 with 1236 views | BcarefulwhatUWish4 |
| FFP relief on 00:09 - Jan 2 by unstableblue |
You can’t take Hirst’s wages off the salary expenditure
So no room there
Room is going to come from the probably larger than expected home gates; and extra revenue items such as Town TV matchday passes. Which I’m sure are high.
The club could gamble on the revenue from playoff semis - gates and TV revenue. |
Which is potentially a fair gamble. |  | | |
| FFP relief on 00:54 - Jan 2 with 1218 views | Bugs |
| FFP relief on 00:09 - Jan 2 by unstableblue |
You can’t take Hirst’s wages off the salary expenditure
So no room there
Room is going to come from the probably larger than expected home gates; and extra revenue items such as Town TV matchday passes. Which I’m sure are high.
The club could gamble on the revenue from playoff semis - gates and TV revenue. |
The club could also gamble on future player transfer fees as an income. |  | | |
| FFP relief on 06:14 - Jan 2 with 1079 views | NorfolknWay |
| FFP relief on 00:54 - Jan 2 by Bugs |
The club could also gamble on future player transfer fees as an income. |
Can you sell the players you're planning to offload anyway for massively inflated fees?
I'm thinking about the American owners flogging off such players to their other club, just to give more leeway to Ipswich. Or are such shenanigans highly frowned upon, and outright prevented? |  | | |
| FFP relief on 07:14 - Jan 2 with 1013 views | EssexBloo |
Would the ideal deal for Stansfield be a loan to buy option?
We could potentially get a fee for Ladapo.
In terms of Vaz to Celtic I see no value for us unless we can get a PL GK for free, this seems very unlikely. | | | |
| FFP relief on 07:31 - Jan 2 with 970 views | ITFC_Forever |
| FFP relief on 00:54 - Jan 2 by Bugs |
The club could also gamble on future player transfer fees as an income. |
So if we think can sell (and then will have to) Leif for £25m in the summer, we can use that this January. |  |
| |
| FFP relief on 08:17 - Jan 2 with 899 views | WeirdFishes |
Worth remembering that the cost of a transfer for FFP purposes is spread over the contract term. So for argument sake if we paid £5m for Stansfield on a 5 year contract the FFP hit would be £1m in each year. |  |
| |
| FFP relief on 08:34 - Jan 2 with 839 views | bournemouthblue |
| FFP relief on 06:14 - Jan 2 by NorfolknWay |
Can you sell the players you're planning to offload anyway for massively inflated fees?
I'm thinking about the American owners flogging off such players to their other club, just to give more leeway to Ipswich. Or are such shenanigans highly frowned upon, and outright prevented? |
I don't think there's anything to stop that. The PL wanted to try and tighten rules with that kind of thing, given the Saudi League could be used by Newcastle and I think Chelsea who also have some Saudi investment, to work their way around FFP |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| FFP relief on 09:20 - Jan 2 with 767 views | Guthrum |
| FFP relief on 06:14 - Jan 2 by NorfolknWay |
Can you sell the players you're planning to offload anyway for massively inflated fees?
I'm thinking about the American owners flogging off such players to their other club, just to give more leeway to Ipswich. Or are such shenanigans highly frowned upon, and outright prevented? |
Not sure the other clubs are wealthy enough to pull off a stunt like that. Also, the players might not wish to move to the USA just to play in their second tier, with limited chances of career progression from thence. |  |
| |
| FFP relief on 09:25 - Jan 2 with 727 views | Guthrum |
| FFP relief on 00:54 - Jan 2 by Bugs |
The club could also gamble on future player transfer fees as an income. |
Would be rather unwise to do so, given a loss of form, significant injury or vagaries of the market can drastically alter a player's value. The club would also then be forced into selling said player at the end of the process, whether or not it was by then convenient. | |
| |
| FFP relief on 09:30 - Jan 2 with 672 views | Wickets |
| FFP relief on 09:25 - Jan 2 by Guthrum |
Would be rather unwise to do so, given a loss of form, significant injury or vagaries of the market can drastically alter a player's value. The club would also then be forced into selling said player at the end of the process, whether or not it was by then convenient. |
And from what Mark Ashton has said we are not into taking that sort of risk . |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
