Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Interesting piece on no deal Brexit 15:32 - Sep 4 with 6903 viewsHerbivore

And in particular whether it is actually something the public supports (the short answer is that it isn't). Also sheds light on why Alexander de Pfeffel Johnson is so desperate to blame the EU for a no deal, it makes it an easier sell: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49551893

Poll: Should someone on benefits earn more than David Cameron?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

0
Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 17:13 - Sep 4 with 1693 viewsGuthrum

Also interesting is that Corbyn is seemingly being quietly outmaneuvered by Starmer and McDonnell on the timing of an election. Maybe the Conservatives are not the only party with a coup going on (just less messy and with fewer casualties).

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

1
Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 17:19 - Sep 4 with 1692 viewsGuthrum

Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 16:40 - Sep 4 by homer_123

Time, surely, to go back to the public with a binding vote that Parliament 'must' deliver.

1. Leave on May's Deal
2. Leave with No Deal
3. Remain in the EU

Parliament is still stymied - we are still no closer to getting a decision (one way of another) and this looks set to continue.

A GE won't solve it. Nor will the Brexit Delay Bill.

We must, surely, be at a point where we have to accept that our MPs cannot make a decision and therefore, it must go back to the populous?


How do you deal with no option having an overall majority? What if Remain is outnumbered by the two Leave options combined? What if two or more options are extremely close (within fractions of a percentage point)?

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 17:23 - Sep 4 with 1688 viewsGuthrum

Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 16:51 - Sep 4 by clive_baker

Splitting the leave vote isn't an option, as much as I would love that. I think it needs to go back to the public with 2 options:

1) Remain
2) Leave without a deal

It can be positioned as 'we listened to the mandate to pursue Brexit which we've done. There's no workable 'deal' so we're left with no deal or no Brexit. The will of the people will be honoured in this 2nd referendum. Remain would win. We can all move on with our lives.


There would be a heck of a lot of work to rebuild trust with Europe after all this. Plus to satisfy angry moderate Brexit types who feel they've been stitched up.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

1
Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 17:34 - Sep 4 with 1680 viewsHerbivore

Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 17:19 - Sep 4 by Guthrum

How do you deal with no option having an overall majority? What if Remain is outnumbered by the two Leave options combined? What if two or more options are extremely close (within fractions of a percentage point)?


You'd have to have preference voting. The lowest of the three options is eliminated and the second preference votes for those whose preferred option has been eliminated go to the remaining options to give a majority for one option.

Poll: Should someone on benefits earn more than David Cameron?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

0
Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 17:42 - Sep 4 with 1668 viewsPinewoodblue

Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 17:34 - Sep 4 by Herbivore

You'd have to have preference voting. The lowest of the three options is eliminated and the second preference votes for those whose preferred option has been eliminated go to the remaining options to give a majority for one option.


Exercising a preference vote would presumably be optional.

2023 year of destiny
Poll: Dickhead "Noun" a stupid, irritating, or ridiculous man.

0
Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 17:44 - Sep 4 with 1668 viewsGuthrum

Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 17:34 - Sep 4 by Herbivore

You'd have to have preference voting. The lowest of the three options is eliminated and the second preference votes for those whose preferred option has been eliminated go to the remaining options to give a majority for one option.


Do you think the UK electorate are up to managing something that complicated?

Not being entirely serious, but I keep being told the they have difficulty with anything which doesn't involve putting a single cross in one box - tho the Scots do alright and local elections sometimes require multiple choices.

The losers would still claim to have been robbed. This fuss isn't going away for a long time.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

1
Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 17:48 - Sep 4 with 1661 viewsGuthrum

Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 17:42 - Sep 4 by Pinewoodblue

Exercising a preference vote would presumably be optional.


Naturally. But the overall largest share would still win, making it in people's interest to try to affect that outcome.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 17:54 - Sep 4 with 1649 viewsPinewoodblue

Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 17:48 - Sep 4 by Guthrum

Naturally. But the overall largest share would still win, making it in people's interest to try to affect that outcome.


Would you prefer a preference vote to the system the French use to elect their President ?

Macron wouldn't have been in the last two if the left were not divided.

2023 year of destiny
Poll: Dickhead "Noun" a stupid, irritating, or ridiculous man.

0
Login to get fewer ads

Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 17:59 - Sep 4 with 1644 viewsGuthrum

Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 17:54 - Sep 4 by Pinewoodblue

Would you prefer a preference vote to the system the French use to elect their President ?

Macron wouldn't have been in the last two if the left were not divided.


A formal two-round election would be very time-consuming. Not sure it would be more accurate than an expression of second preference in the initial vote, especially as little is likely to materially change between the two (unlike with candidates standing for a position, who can shift their position or commit gaffes).

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 18:38 - Sep 4 with 1624 viewsBlueBadger

Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 17:44 - Sep 4 by Guthrum

Do you think the UK electorate are up to managing something that complicated?

Not being entirely serious, but I keep being told the they have difficulty with anything which doesn't involve putting a single cross in one box - tho the Scots do alright and local elections sometimes require multiple choices.

The losers would still claim to have been robbed. This fuss isn't going away for a long time.


But at least the main aim of the whole affair, unity with the Conservative party, has been achieved.

I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Poll: What would be the funniest relegation on Saturday
Blog: From Despair to Where?

0
Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 18:43 - Sep 4 with 1624 viewsHerbivore

Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 17:44 - Sep 4 by Guthrum

Do you think the UK electorate are up to managing something that complicated?

Not being entirely serious, but I keep being told the they have difficulty with anything which doesn't involve putting a single cross in one box - tho the Scots do alright and local elections sometimes require multiple choices.

The losers would still claim to have been robbed. This fuss isn't going away for a long time.


They may well claim they've been robbed but it's clearly the fairest and clearest way out of this mess.

Poll: Should someone on benefits earn more than David Cameron?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

0
Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 18:48 - Sep 4 with 1620 viewsBlueBadger

Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 18:43 - Sep 4 by Herbivore

They may well claim they've been robbed but it's clearly the fairest and clearest way out of this mess.


And at least they can can get on with their whining, entitled victimhood withood screwing the rest of the country into the ground either.

I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Poll: What would be the funniest relegation on Saturday
Blog: From Despair to Where?

1
Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 18:49 - Sep 4 with 1620 viewsGuthrum

And now he wants to stick an economic border down the Irish Sea. Not, in itself, a daft suggestion, but unlikely to go down well with the DUP.


Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 18:57 - Sep 4 with 1604 viewsDanTheMan

Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 18:49 - Sep 4 by Guthrum

And now he wants to stick an economic border down the Irish Sea. Not, in itself, a daft suggestion, but unlikely to go down well with the DUP.



Isn't that basically just the backstop though...

Poll: FM Parallel Game Week 1 (Fulham) - Available Team

0
Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 18:57 - Sep 4 with 1603 viewsHerbivore

Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 18:49 - Sep 4 by Guthrum

And now he wants to stick an economic border down the Irish Sea. Not, in itself, a daft suggestion, but unlikely to go down well with the DUP.



He's utterly hopeless.

Poll: Should someone on benefits earn more than David Cameron?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

0
Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 19:00 - Sep 4 with 1602 viewsSwansea_Blue

Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 18:49 - Sep 4 by Guthrum

And now he wants to stick an economic border down the Irish Sea. Not, in itself, a daft suggestion, but unlikely to go down well with the DUP.



Otherwise known as the original preferred EU option, until we argued for a whole UK position.

I’m going to need meds before too long if this gets any more surreal.

Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

0
Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 19:01 - Sep 4 with 1600 viewsGlasgowBlue

Although when given the choice between no deal or Corbyn they go for no deal.



Which suggests that Starmer and co should get him out pronto.
[Post edited 4 Sep 2019 19:01]

Iron Lion Zion
Poll: Our best central defensive partnership?
Blog: [Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

0
Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 19:13 - Sep 4 with 1588 viewsGlasgowBlue

Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 17:13 - Sep 4 by Guthrum

Also interesting is that Corbyn is seemingly being quietly outmaneuvered by Starmer and McDonnell on the timing of an election. Maybe the Conservatives are not the only party with a coup going on (just less messy and with fewer casualties).


Corbyn slapping Starmer down


Iron Lion Zion
Poll: Our best central defensive partnership?
Blog: [Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

0
Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 19:21 - Sep 4 with 1577 viewsGuthrum

Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 18:57 - Sep 4 by DanTheMan

Isn't that basically just the backstop though...


Not really. The Backstop would keep the entire UK tied into a customs union, not just Northern Ireland. Avoiding any further* separation between NI and GB was a cornerstone of May's approach (largely due to the DUP).


* There is already legal, political and judicial separation.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 19:27 - Sep 4 with 1576 viewsGuthrum

Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 19:00 - Sep 4 by Swansea_Blue

Otherwise known as the original preferred EU option, until we argued for a whole UK position.

I’m going to need meds before too long if this gets any more surreal.


They'll eventually put forward something with free trade, a customs union and freedom of labour/movement. At which point Farage and the ERG will explode.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
Talking of which on 19:42 - Sep 4 with 1564 viewsGuthrum

Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 19:27 - Sep 4 by Guthrum

They'll eventually put forward something with free trade, a customs union and freedom of labour/movement. At which point Farage and the ERG will explode.


One of the Kinnock amendments, forcing the Government to adopt a version of the May WA amended by the cross-party discussions if they neither make their own deal nor the HoC agrees No Deal, has passed - seemingly by accident, when those opposing it failed to put up any tellers for the vote.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
Talking of which on 19:47 - Sep 4 with 1562 viewsDanTheMan

Talking of which on 19:42 - Sep 4 by Guthrum

One of the Kinnock amendments, forcing the Government to adopt a version of the May WA amended by the cross-party discussions if they neither make their own deal nor the HoC agrees No Deal, has passed - seemingly by accident, when those opposing it failed to put up any tellers for the vote.


Who's job is it to oppose? Is it the Government?

EDIT: Yes it seems that way. I can't imagine this was accidental.

[Post edited 4 Sep 2019 19:49]

Poll: FM Parallel Game Week 1 (Fulham) - Available Team

0
Talking of which on 20:01 - Sep 4 with 1553 viewsGuthrum

Talking of which on 19:47 - Sep 4 by DanTheMan

Who's job is it to oppose? Is it the Government?

EDIT: Yes it seems that way. I can't imagine this was accidental.

[Post edited 4 Sep 2019 19:49]


The Bill has passed its second reading anyway, if the intention was to throw a spanner in that.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 20:39 - Sep 4 with 1529 viewsC_HealyIsAPleasure

Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 17:34 - Sep 4 by Herbivore

You'd have to have preference voting. The lowest of the three options is eliminated and the second preference votes for those whose preferred option has been eliminated go to the remaining options to give a majority for one option.


Surely it would have to be more along the lines of 2 questions, the first being Leave or Remain, and the second then being if Leave wins what type of Leave would you prefer?

Although I still think the cat is too far out of the bag for another referendum now, personally

Highlighting crass stupidity since sometime around 2010
Poll: Would you want Messi to sign?

0
Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 21:08 - Sep 4 with 1512 viewsHerbivore

Interesting piece on no deal Brexit on 20:39 - Sep 4 by C_HealyIsAPleasure

Surely it would have to be more along the lines of 2 questions, the first being Leave or Remain, and the second then being if Leave wins what type of Leave would you prefer?

Although I still think the cat is too far out of the bag for another referendum now, personally


Nope. You can't have a binary unspecified leave or remain referendum at all, not even as a first stage. That's what created the mess in the first place. There needs to be a concrete leave option or options to vote on.

Poll: Should someone on benefits earn more than David Cameron?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

2
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2024