Interesting censorship (n/t) 09:47 - Dec 30 with 24830 views | Bluefish | | |
| | |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 10:55 - Dec 30 with 4583 views | PhilTWTD |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 10:46 - Dec 30 by Bluefish | It is a wider problem in the game that some supporters and pundits view black players as lazy. We can censor it though and ban people that discuss it if it helps. |
Although what you posted was, as so often, just intended to start a row and snipe at other users and supporters rather than having any intention of starting a serious discussion of the issue. Not going to get drawn in any further, it stops or you will no longer be welcome. | | | |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 10:55 - Dec 30 with 4577 views | Bluefish |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 10:54 - Dec 30 by Harry_Palmer | You know full well that you suggested it was happening on this board, and I suspect you were aiming it at anybody who has criticised Spence. There was nothing about a discussion of a wider problem within the game, it was just a very lazy swipe from you at fellow supporters. You are simply on a wind up, do you really not have anything better to do? |
That is how lots in the game always react when this point is raised | |
| |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 10:58 - Dec 30 with 4575 views | Bluefish |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 10:55 - Dec 30 by PhilTWTD | Although what you posted was, as so often, just intended to start a row and snipe at other users and supporters rather than having any intention of starting a serious discussion of the issue. Not going to get drawn in any further, it stops or you will no longer be welcome. |
Ok then I will leave it as well because I have no choice. I don't understand but questioning it results in a ban so I will have to do what I'm told. Again I apologise for calling roy keane a c*** all of those years ago. Unfortunately I can't go back and change it now so I will just have to hope one day we can move on from it | |
| |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 11:02 - Dec 30 with 4546 views | Harry_Palmer |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 10:55 - Dec 30 by Bluefish | That is how lots in the game always react when this point is raised |
Not going to play your silly game anymore, you are clearly not worth it. | | | |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 11:36 - Dec 30 with 4490 views | jjblue84 |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 10:46 - Dec 30 by PhilTWTD | It used the phrase "donating to that charitable cause of the Marcus Evans Group", which I read as money going out of the club to MEG. It wasn't deleted - it's still on the system - it would have gone up if you'd made the amendment. |
Read it how you like, it’s not what I wrote. So why twist my words?? It’s not on my blogs section, so where is it? | | | |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 11:37 - Dec 30 with 4486 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 10:54 - Dec 30 by Harry_Palmer | You know full well that you suggested it was happening on this board, and I suspect you were aiming it at anybody who has criticised Spence. There was nothing about a discussion of a wider problem within the game, it was just a very lazy swipe from you at fellow supporters. You are simply on a wind up, do you really not have anything better to do? |
In fairness, players accused of being lazy do always seem to fit a certain profile... | |
| |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 12:11 - Dec 30 with 4438 views | PhilTWTD |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 11:36 - Dec 30 by jjblue84 | Read it how you like, it’s not what I wrote. So why twist my words?? It’s not on my blogs section, so where is it? |
It's exactly what you wrote, I cut and pasted that from the blog. It's still on the system but not live. If you'd have amended or clarified what you meant it would have gone live at the time.
This post has been edited by an administrator | | | |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 12:33 - Dec 30 with 4398 views | homer_123 |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 11:37 - Dec 30 by C_HealyIsAPleasure | In fairness, players accused of being lazy do always seem to fit a certain profile... |
Yes, the lazy profile... | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 12:36 - Dec 30 with 4397 views | J2BLUE |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 11:36 - Dec 30 by jjblue84 | Read it how you like, it’s not what I wrote. So why twist my words?? It’s not on my blogs section, so where is it? |
You don't have to look far to find criticism of Evans on this site, on the forum, in blogs and in the comments section of news stories. | |
| |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 12:42 - Dec 30 with 4375 views | Coastalblue | No matter the rights and wrongs here, it's worth remembering we are all in Phil and Gav's house, free of charge for the majority. If we want to enjoy their hospitality we play by their rules, we all have a choice. | |
| |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 12:46 - Dec 30 with 4350 views | footers |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 12:42 - Dec 30 by Coastalblue | No matter the rights and wrongs here, it's worth remembering we are all in Phil and Gav's house, free of charge for the majority. If we want to enjoy their hospitality we play by their rules, we all have a choice. |
Free? So where have my £15.99 monthly subs been going? | |
| |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 12:47 - Dec 30 with 4350 views | Coastalblue |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 12:46 - Dec 30 by footers | Free? So where have my £15.99 monthly subs been going? |
Moose Industries? | |
| |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 12:48 - Dec 30 with 4333 views | footers |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 12:47 - Dec 30 by Coastalblue | Moose Industries? |
Damn, not again. You would have thought a 1,000lb ungulate would be easier to spot... Must have been the hat and sunglasses. | |
| |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 13:39 - Dec 30 with 4249 views | jjblue84 |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 12:11 - Dec 30 by PhilTWTD | It's exactly what you wrote, I cut and pasted that from the blog. It's still on the system but not live. If you'd have amended or clarified what you meant it would have gone live at the time.
This post has been edited by an administrator |
So where 'on the system' is it? Can anyone access it, including me? Or is it for all intents and purposes deleted??? And I didn't say that Evans was 'taking money out of the club', so why use this as the reason why it wasn't posted and twist my words?? | | | |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 13:52 - Dec 30 with 4215 views | itfcjoe |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 13:39 - Dec 30 by jjblue84 | So where 'on the system' is it? Can anyone access it, including me? Or is it for all intents and purposes deleted??? And I didn't say that Evans was 'taking money out of the club', so why use this as the reason why it wasn't posted and twist my words?? |
You aren't very bright are you? | |
| |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 13:58 - Dec 30 with 4198 views | footers |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 13:39 - Dec 30 by jjblue84 | So where 'on the system' is it? Can anyone access it, including me? Or is it for all intents and purposes deleted??? And I didn't say that Evans was 'taking money out of the club', so why use this as the reason why it wasn't posted and twist my words?? |
You should print off a physical version of your hard-hitting analysis and submit it to the British Library for the benefit of future generations. No one, not even Phil, can suppress the truth from getting out. | |
| |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 14:02 - Dec 30 with 4182 views | jjblue84 |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 13:52 - Dec 30 by itfcjoe | You aren't very bright are you? |
Ah, Phil's mob mates are appearing... | | | |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 14:12 - Dec 30 with 4162 views | itfcjoe |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 14:02 - Dec 30 by jjblue84 | Ah, Phil's mob mates are appearing... |
Try reading what has actually been said. He has said if you amend the piece he will put it live, until then he won't as he believes it is a factual inaccuracy. It's not difficult to understand surely?! | |
| |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 14:16 - Dec 30 with 4133 views | Darth_Koont |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 14:12 - Dec 30 by itfcjoe | Try reading what has actually been said. He has said if you amend the piece he will put it live, until then he won't as he believes it is a factual inaccuracy. It's not difficult to understand surely?! |
Maybe his blog doesn't have a point if he changes it? | |
| |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 14:31 - Dec 30 with 4096 views | jjblue84 |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 14:12 - Dec 30 by itfcjoe | Try reading what has actually been said. He has said if you amend the piece he will put it live, until then he won't as he believes it is a factual inaccuracy. It's not difficult to understand surely?! |
What is a factual inaccuracy? | | | |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 14:34 - Dec 30 with 4091 views | J2BLUE |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 14:31 - Dec 30 by jjblue84 | What is a factual inaccuracy? |
A piece of information that is wrong, like Evans makes money from ITFC because of tax write offs. Easily disprovable nonsense. | |
| |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 14:36 - Dec 30 with 4072 views | jjblue84 |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 14:34 - Dec 30 by J2BLUE | A piece of information that is wrong, like Evans makes money from ITFC because of tax write offs. Easily disprovable nonsense. |
Is it? Did I say that? | | | |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 14:45 - Dec 30 with 4045 views | J2BLUE |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 14:36 - Dec 30 by jjblue84 | Is it? Did I say that? |
It was an example, I didn't say you said that. What did you mean by the charitable donation line Phil highlighted? | |
| |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 14:50 - Dec 30 with 4016 views | jjblue84 |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 14:45 - Dec 30 by J2BLUE | It was an example, I didn't say you said that. What did you mean by the charitable donation line Phil highlighted? |
Thanks for the example, maybe argue with someone who did that say that!! | | | |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 14:54 - Dec 30 with 3998 views | J2BLUE |
Interesting censorship (n/t) on 14:50 - Dec 30 by jjblue84 | Thanks for the example, maybe argue with someone who did that say that!! |
Thanks, that answers my question. | |
| |
| |