| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? 16:42 - Jul 1 with 9758 views | MaySixth |
been noticing it a lot the last few years
This post has been edited by an administrator |  |
| |  |
| Because they are loosers. (n/t) on 16:48 - Jul 1 with 5222 views | Bloots |
|  |
| Elite Level Poster: Elite Level Supporter: Elite Level Human |
| |
| Because they are loosers. (n/t) on 16:49 - Jul 1 with 5222 views | footers |
| Because they are loosers. (n/t) on 16:48 - Jul 1 by Bloots |
|
Its infuriating for me to. |  |
| |
| Because they are loosers. (n/t) on 16:51 - Jul 1 with 5214 views | GeoffSentence |
| Because they are loosers. (n/t) on 16:49 - Jul 1 by footers |
Its infuriating for me to. |
A plasterer has just driven past my house with that same missing apostrophe on his van
"not just a job, its art" |  |
| |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 16:52 - Jul 1 with 5204 views | jeera |
It is frustrating. |  |
| |
| Because they are loosers. (n/t) on 16:54 - Jul 1 with 5193 views | jeera |
| Because they are loosers. (n/t) on 16:51 - Jul 1 by GeoffSentence |
A plasterer has just driven past my house with that same missing apostrophe on his van
"not just a job, its art" |
That actually bugs me less than the possessive form being used with an apostrophe. | |
| |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 16:54 - Jul 1 with 5191 views | jaykay |
time we started to tighten up on this. |  |
| forensic experts say footers and spruces fingerprints were not found at the scene after the weekends rows |
| |
| It's easy to get too anal about.... on 16:57 - Jul 1 with 5184 views | Bloots |
| Because they are loosers. (n/t) on 16:54 - Jul 1 by jeera |
That actually bugs me less than the possessive form being used with an apostrophe. |
...it when you're posting on forums or texting etc.
Grammar police turds and all that.
But people actually taking time and then spending money to get things printed or painted incorrectly is remarkable.
Innit. | |
| Elite Level Poster: Elite Level Supporter: Elite Level Human |
| |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 17:00 - Jul 1 with 5166 views | Steve_M |
It's not as common as of/had but shouldn't be too difficult. Worse/worst does get annoying too. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 17:06 - Jul 1 with 5152 views | HolyGoalie |
ooooh big man with the dictionary i sea. What a twet |  |
| Ipswich by the grace of gloves |
| |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 17:53 - Jul 1 with 5105 views | PositivelyPortman |
Starting every sentence with “So” is even more annoying to me.
Another Americanism creeping in.  |  |
| |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 17:55 - Jul 1 with 5099 views | hoppy |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 17:53 - Jul 1 by PositivelyPortman |
Starting every sentence with “So” is even more annoying to me.
Another Americanism creeping in. |
"Whatever!"
 |  |
| |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 18:00 - Jul 1 with 5092 views | Kropotkin123 |
The English language is an absolute basket case. People getting annoyed by the use of the language, rather than the language itself make me laugh.
- 5 vowels for about 20 vowels sounds. Stupid.
- Pointless letters like C, that just steal sounds off other letters. Confusing new learners. Stupid.
- No way of telling where the syllables land, unless taught. Stupid.
- Capital letters. Pointless. They don't exist in other languages, like Korean.
- Spelling the same sound multiple different ways and then acting surprised when people use them in the wrong place. E.g. they're, their, there. Stupid.
- Its or it's... it doesn't matter. It is the same sound. Context makes it abundantly clear which one is correct.
I can go on. The language needs a complete overhaul. Users really aren't to blame. [Post edited 1 Jul 2019 18:01]
|  |
| |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 18:02 - Jul 1 with 5074 views | Nazemariner |
Shew instead of showed |  | | |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 18:04 - Jul 1 with 5069 views | footers |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 18:00 - Jul 1 by Kropotkin123 |
The English language is an absolute basket case. People getting annoyed by the use of the language, rather than the language itself make me laugh.
- 5 vowels for about 20 vowels sounds. Stupid.
- Pointless letters like C, that just steal sounds off other letters. Confusing new learners. Stupid.
- No way of telling where the syllables land, unless taught. Stupid.
- Capital letters. Pointless. They don't exist in other languages, like Korean.
- Spelling the same sound multiple different ways and then acting surprised when people use them in the wrong place. E.g. they're, their, there. Stupid.
- Its or it's... it doesn't matter. It is the same sound. Context makes it abundantly clear which one is correct.
I can go on. The language needs a complete overhaul. Users really aren't to blame. [Post edited 1 Jul 2019 18:01]
|
Could you say that again, please, just in Esperanto this time. | |
| |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 18:05 - Jul 1 with 5065 views | Superblue95 |
The worst by far is people who confuse “definitely” and “defiantly”
The mind boggles at how regularly people mix them up |  |
| |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 18:05 - Jul 1 with 5065 views | GeoffSentence |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 18:00 - Jul 1 by Kropotkin123 |
The English language is an absolute basket case. People getting annoyed by the use of the language, rather than the language itself make me laugh.
- 5 vowels for about 20 vowels sounds. Stupid.
- Pointless letters like C, that just steal sounds off other letters. Confusing new learners. Stupid.
- No way of telling where the syllables land, unless taught. Stupid.
- Capital letters. Pointless. They don't exist in other languages, like Korean.
- Spelling the same sound multiple different ways and then acting surprised when people use them in the wrong place. E.g. they're, their, there. Stupid.
- Its or it's... it doesn't matter. It is the same sound. Context makes it abundantly clear which one is correct.
I can go on. The language needs a complete overhaul. Users really aren't to blame. [Post edited 1 Jul 2019 18:01]
|
"ough" that's the most fwcked up spelling in English
cough
tough
bough
lough
hiccough
through
though
nought
All the same spelling, everyone sounds different. There are probably a few more I haven't thought of. | |
| |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 18:06 - Jul 1 with 5062 views | HolyGoalie |
The only word that matters is VAR | |
| Ipswich by the grace of gloves |
| |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 18:08 - Jul 1 with 5057 views | GeoffSentence |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 18:06 - Jul 1 by HolyGoalie |
The only word that matters is VAR |
It's pronounced like that, but I think it might be spelled Vough. | |
| |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 18:10 - Jul 1 with 5050 views | hoppy |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 18:00 - Jul 1 by Kropotkin123 |
The English language is an absolute basket case. People getting annoyed by the use of the language, rather than the language itself make me laugh.
- 5 vowels for about 20 vowels sounds. Stupid.
- Pointless letters like C, that just steal sounds off other letters. Confusing new learners. Stupid.
- No way of telling where the syllables land, unless taught. Stupid.
- Capital letters. Pointless. They don't exist in other languages, like Korean.
- Spelling the same sound multiple different ways and then acting surprised when people use them in the wrong place. E.g. they're, their, there. Stupid.
- Its or it's... it doesn't matter. It is the same sound. Context makes it abundantly clear which one is correct.
I can go on. The language needs a complete overhaul. Users really aren't to blame. [Post edited 1 Jul 2019 18:01]
|
innit. | |
| |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 18:15 - Jul 1 with 5038 views | Kropotkin123 |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 18:05 - Jul 1 by GeoffSentence |
"ough" that's the most fwcked up spelling in English
cough
tough
bough
lough
hiccough
through
though
nought
All the same spelling, everyone sounds different. There are probably a few more I haven't thought of. |
Seeing them all written out next to each other hurts my eyes | |
| |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 18:25 - Jul 1 with 5019 views | Guthrum |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 18:02 - Jul 1 by Nazemariner |
Shew instead of showed |
Rather outdated, but entirely correct English. |  |
| |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 18:26 - Jul 1 with 5015 views | footers |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 18:25 - Jul 1 by Guthrum |
Rather outdated, but entirely correct English. |
And more importantly, entirely correct Suffolkian.  | |
| |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 18:29 - Jul 1 with 5005 views | Herbivore |
They should of went too school. There idiots. [Post edited 1 Jul 2019 18:29]
|  |
| |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 18:30 - Jul 1 with 4995 views | Superblue95 |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 18:29 - Jul 1 by Herbivore |
They should of went too school. There idiots. [Post edited 1 Jul 2019 18:29]
|
*Shud
**Skool | |
| |
| Why do so many people spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? on 18:42 - Jul 1 with 4964 views | eireblue |
Hmmmm..... how do we know you didn’t mean ‘loose’ as 'lose'? |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
