That's two terrible defeats for Norwich 15:57 - Dec 8 with 3630 views | Bobbychase | Leicester away next weekend,. They could be adrift with Watford by the end of the year. [Post edited 8 Dec 2019 16:00]
| |
| | |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 18:11 - Dec 8 with 1135 views | Dennyx4 |
Thanks for the link, had heard that was the reason that they hadn't spent any money. Would have been in a lot of bother, if they hadn't got up. The gamble on wages certainly worked for them, last year. | | | |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 18:19 - Dec 8 with 1125 views | Herbivore |
Not sure how they only turned over £33m when they sold Maddison and Murphy for around £30m. Maybe they were in the previous year's accounts. [Post edited 8 Dec 2019 18:23]
| |
| |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 18:37 - Dec 8 with 1105 views | Dennyx4 |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 18:19 - Dec 8 by Herbivore | Not sure how they only turned over £33m when they sold Maddison and Murphy for around £30m. Maybe they were in the previous year's accounts. [Post edited 8 Dec 2019 18:23]
|
Think it was the wage bill that was the issue. I am sure someone posted (Elder Grizzly?) that they needed to make £30m to break even without acquiring any new players. Rhodes alone reportedly cost £2.5m loan fee and another £2m in wages. | | | |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 18:49 - Dec 8 with 1085 views | longtimefan |
The £95M in that article refers to income from the Premier League, not profits. | | | |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 18:50 - Dec 8 with 1084 views | Herbivore |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 18:37 - Dec 8 by Dennyx4 | Think it was the wage bill that was the issue. I am sure someone posted (Elder Grizzly?) that they needed to make £30m to break even without acquiring any new players. Rhodes alone reportedly cost £2.5m loan fee and another £2m in wages. |
They got £30m the previous summer for two players though. Maybe they'd have needed it again but I thought those sales basically covered them for the season. They didn't spend much on fees last year. | |
| |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 19:00 - Dec 8 with 1070 views | BLUEBEAT |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 18:49 - Dec 8 by longtimefan | The £95M in that article refers to income from the Premier League, not profits. |
Yes - should be projected income [Post edited 8 Dec 2019 19:01]
| |
| |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 19:02 - Dec 8 with 1069 views | Reuser_is_God |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 16:02 - Dec 8 by Herbivore | I don't think their game plan was ever to stay up. I know that sounds odd but they barely strengthened and I don't think they really expected to go up last season. They'll go down, lose one or two for decent money, then use those funds plus parachute payments to come back stronger. |
That sporting director bloke whatever he is said exactly that when they were on Sky the other week against Watford. | |
| |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 19:27 - Dec 8 with 1042 views | suffolkpoker |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 18:37 - Dec 8 by Dennyx4 | Think it was the wage bill that was the issue. I am sure someone posted (Elder Grizzly?) that they needed to make £30m to break even without acquiring any new players. Rhodes alone reportedly cost £2.5m loan fee and another £2m in wages. |
The best bit is if they only stay in the premier league for 1 year, they only get parachute payments for 1 year and not 3. They are taking very big risks | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 19:36 - Dec 8 with 1029 views | gainsboroughblue |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 19:27 - Dec 8 by suffolkpoker | The best bit is if they only stay in the premier league for 1 year, they only get parachute payments for 1 year and not 3. They are taking very big risks |
Quite. But Norwich seem to be one of those clubs that just fall on their feet when they need it. | |
| |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 19:57 - Dec 8 with 1000 views | ParisBlue |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 19:36 - Dec 8 by gainsboroughblue | Quite. But Norwich seem to be one of those clubs that just fall on their feet when they need it. |
Let's just concentrate on making sure we are playing them next season... | |
| |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 20:07 - Dec 8 with 986 views | Swansea_Blue |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 18:19 - Dec 8 by Herbivore | Not sure how they only turned over £33m when they sold Maddison and Murphy for around £30m. Maybe they were in the previous year's accounts. [Post edited 8 Dec 2019 18:23]
|
Player amortisation I suspect - it's standard practice to smear their value over the length of their contracts. | |
| |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 21:00 - Dec 8 with 937 views | sundaze |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 19:27 - Dec 8 by suffolkpoker | The best bit is if they only stay in the premier league for 1 year, they only get parachute payments for 1 year and not 3. They are taking very big risks |
They will get payments for two years if they are relegated after only one season. 55% of an equally shared element of premier league broadcasting rights next season and 45% the following season [Post edited 8 Dec 2019 21:02]
| | | |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 21:04 - Dec 8 with 919 views | PJH |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 19:57 - Dec 8 by ParisBlue | Let's just concentrate on making sure we are playing them next season... |
Yes, they are doing their best to make it happen so we must do the same. Weekends always improve when Naaarwich have lost. | | | |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 00:51 - Dec 9 with 831 views | ActionMan | They could go down and we'll still not be in the same division as them next season. | | | |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 01:02 - Dec 9 with 828 views | gainsboroughblue |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 00:51 - Dec 9 by ActionMan | They could go down and we'll still not be in the same division as them next season. |
Demoted two divisions for financial irregularity? That would be hilarious. [Post edited 9 Dec 2019 1:09]
| |
| |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 08:14 - Dec 9 with 746 views | itfcjoe |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 16:02 - Dec 8 by Herbivore | I don't think their game plan was ever to stay up. I know that sounds odd but they barely strengthened and I don't think they really expected to go up last season. They'll go down, lose one or two for decent money, then use those funds plus parachute payments to come back stronger. |
One bad season then they get into a muddle, and how many clubs bounce straight back? Just doesn't seem to happen any more | |
| |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 08:15 - Dec 9 with 744 views | Herbivore |
That's two terrible defeats for Norwich on 00:51 - Dec 9 by ActionMan | They could go down and we'll still not be in the same division as them next season. |
Give it a rest. | |
| |
| |