| Wonder which paper it was... on 11:20 - Sep 18 with 851 views | clive_baker |
Scum.
Don't buy the S*n. |  |
|  |
| Wonder which paper it was... on 11:23 - Sep 18 with 863 views | footers |
Mentioned in Private Eye today, actually.
The S*n had 'revealed' a rumour that a sports star was to announce they had HIV over Tw@tter in August.
After Stokes and now this, surely people need to start banning that group's papers from attending pressers etc. |  |
| |
| Wonder which paper it was... on 11:26 - Sep 18 with 835 views | Dyland |
| Wonder which paper it was... on 11:23 - Sep 18 by footers |
Mentioned in Private Eye today, actually.
The S*n had 'revealed' a rumour that a sports star was to announce they had HIV over Tw@tter in August.
After Stokes and now this, surely people need to start banning that group's papers from attending pressers etc. |
That kind of banning behaviour sets a really bad precedent in my view. Disney do similar to outlets critical of their movies or that question their hegemony in the (kids) entertainment industry.
Far better for people to boycott the ghastly sh1te publication in all its forms. |  |
| |
| Wonder which paper it was... on 11:30 - Sep 18 with 820 views | footers |
| Wonder which paper it was... on 11:26 - Sep 18 by Dyland |
That kind of banning behaviour sets a really bad precedent in my view. Disney do similar to outlets critical of their movies or that question their hegemony in the (kids) entertainment industry.
Far better for people to boycott the ghastly sh1te publication in all its forms. |
Problem is, dyllers, that people have been saying that for donkey's but they continue to sell shedloads of papers. I'm not sure what other avenues are open to people to take on papers like that, aside from IPSO, which is pretty pisspoor itself. | |
| |
| Wonder which paper it was... on 11:34 - Sep 18 with 806 views | Dyland |
| Wonder which paper it was... on 11:30 - Sep 18 by footers |
Problem is, dyllers, that people have been saying that for donkey's but they continue to sell shedloads of papers. I'm not sure what other avenues are open to people to take on papers like that, aside from IPSO, which is pretty pisspoor itself. |
The people get the media they deserve I guess.
I hear you though. | |
| |
| Wonder which paper it was... on 13:27 - Sep 18 with 718 views | factual_blue |
| Wonder which paper it was... on 11:23 - Sep 18 by footers |
Mentioned in Private Eye today, actually.
The S*n had 'revealed' a rumour that a sports star was to announce they had HIV over Tw@tter in August.
After Stokes and now this, surely people need to start banning that group's papers from attending pressers etc. |
I've never read any S*n 'journalist's' work, but I trod in some once. [Post edited 18 Sep 2019 13:59]
|  |
| |
| Wonder which paper it was... on 13:28 - Sep 18 with 705 views | footers |
| Wonder which paper it was... on 13:27 - Sep 18 by factual_blue |
I've never read any S*n 'journalist's' work, but I trod in some once. [Post edited 18 Sep 2019 13:59]
|
They employ journalists now? | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
