Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
VAR 18:06 - Dec 28 with 1349 viewsChris_ITFC

Hate it
0
VAR on 18:09 - Dec 28 with 1337 viewsScuzzer

Yes I know its Norwich....but that was no way offside. Just heard that it was deemed to be because he came back from an offside position....BEFORE THE BALL WAS PLAYED...what the heck is going on here nowadays.

Established 1968

4
VAR on 18:12 - Dec 28 with 1314 viewsChris_ITFC

VAR on 18:09 - Dec 28 by Scuzzer

Yes I know its Norwich....but that was no way offside. Just heard that it was deemed to be because he came back from an offside position....BEFORE THE BALL WAS PLAYED...what the heck is going on here nowadays.


Exactly. We're the most biased viewers of that goal in the country, but I despair if that's brought back and ruled out because his armpit is half a millimetre ahead of Alderweireld's knee.
5
VAR on 18:22 - Dec 28 with 1255 viewsHerbivore

I hate Norwich as much as the next man, but that's a joke of a decision.

Poll: Should someone on benefits earn more than David Cameron?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

5
VAR on 18:22 - Dec 28 with 1255 viewsScuzzer

VAR on 18:12 - Dec 28 by Chris_ITFC

Exactly. We're the most biased viewers of that goal in the country, but I despair if that's brought back and ruled out because his armpit is half a millimetre ahead of Alderweireld's knee.


What became of 'clear and obvious'...something needs to be done asap to return the game into the hands of the referee and linesman. Farce....Carrot crunchers were singing "it's not football anymore" and for once i agree with them.

Established 1968

4
VAR on 18:23 - Dec 28 with 1243 viewsfooters

#LoveBrexitHateVAR

footers KC - Prosecution Barrister - Friend to all
Poll: Battle of the breakfast potato... who wins?

0
VAR on 18:29 - Dec 28 with 1199 viewsNthsuffolkblue

There were a number of problems with that one. Very surprised to see it overturned.

1 The frame didn't show the ball being played (presumably it was correctly frozen at the same time from another frame which should be OK).

2 The camera is not in line. No matter how much drawing lines is done, they cannot be 100% infallible. If you are going to use VAR for offside, have a camera that constantly follows up and down the line of the last defender (or second last if the keeper is ahead of them). It can't be that hard with modern technology.

3 The only part that appeared to be offside was his arm which cannot be used to play the ball.

That said, it was Norwich so it was funny. However, they are also still 1-0 up and Tottenham need to pull their finger out and stop blasting 1-on-1s high over the bar.

Poll: Is Jeremy Clarkson misogynistic, racist or plain nasty?
Blog: [Blog] Ghostbusters

1
VAR on 18:34 - Dec 28 with 1170 viewsfactual_blue

Spurs to go on to win 2-1.


Ta neige, Acadie, fait des larmes au soleil
Poll: Do you grind your gears
Blog: [Blog] The Shape We're In

1
VAR on 18:49 - Dec 28 with 1102 viewsEastTownBlue

VAR on 18:34 - Dec 28 by factual_blue

Spurs to go on to win 2-1.



That worked well then.
0
Login to get fewer ads

VAR on 19:03 - Dec 28 with 1056 viewsScuzzer

VAR on 18:49 - Dec 28 by EastTownBlue

That worked well then.


The football gods have shown two fingers to VAR.

Established 1968

0
VAR on 19:10 - Dec 28 with 1037 viewsfactual_blue

VAR on 18:49 - Dec 28 by EastTownBlue

That worked well then.


2-2. Spurs to win 3-2 then.

Ta neige, Acadie, fait des larmes au soleil
Poll: Do you grind your gears
Blog: [Blog] The Shape We're In

0
VAR on 19:22 - Dec 28 with 1008 viewsNthsuffolkblue

VAR on 19:10 - Dec 28 by factual_blue

2-2. Spurs to win 3-2 then.


Not going to happen. A point each which is too little to be much good for either of them.

Poll: Is Jeremy Clarkson misogynistic, racist or plain nasty?
Blog: [Blog] Ghostbusters

0
VAR on 19:32 - Dec 28 with 974 viewsbilllm

It's crap,
0
VAR on 19:35 - Dec 28 with 967 viewsWickets

Offside used to be clear daylight now if you forget to cut your finger nails your off !
2
VAR on 22:27 - Dec 28 with 774 viewsChris_ITFC

VAR on 18:29 - Dec 28 by Nthsuffolkblue

There were a number of problems with that one. Very surprised to see it overturned.

1 The frame didn't show the ball being played (presumably it was correctly frozen at the same time from another frame which should be OK).

2 The camera is not in line. No matter how much drawing lines is done, they cannot be 100% infallible. If you are going to use VAR for offside, have a camera that constantly follows up and down the line of the last defender (or second last if the keeper is ahead of them). It can't be that hard with modern technology.

3 The only part that appeared to be offside was his arm which cannot be used to play the ball.

That said, it was Norwich so it was funny. However, they are also still 1-0 up and Tottenham need to pull their finger out and stop blasting 1-on-1s high over the bar.


When the margin between Pukki and Alderweireld is so miniscule, the technology has to be able to work without a margin of error... which clearly it doesn't, as per your #1 and #2.
0
VAR on 22:29 - Dec 28 with 771 viewsChris_ITFC

VAR on 19:35 - Dec 28 by Wickets

Offside used to be clear daylight now if you forget to cut your finger nails your off !


Agreed! Or even what Pukki did... which used to be good centre forward play!
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2024