| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? 13:25 - Sep 2 with 1616 views | skyblue23 |
n/t |  |
| |  |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 14:14 - Sep 2 with 1518 views | TRUE_BLUE123 |
ATM. No.
Purely because the system is wrong for him as it is for Judge, as it is for Nolan.
He may be able to do a job on the left hand side of midfield over Judge. He is probably more suited for that role than Judge is. |  |
| |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 14:17 - Sep 2 with 1495 views | IpswichKnight |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 14:14 - Sep 2 by TRUE_BLUE123 |
ATM. No.
Purely because the system is wrong for him as it is for Judge, as it is for Nolan.
He may be able to do a job on the left hand side of midfield over Judge. He is probably more suited for that role than Judge is. |
I thought we went much more like a diamond when Nolan came on, we definitely looked a lot more composed and happy to go though the middle once he came on instead of the ( successful ) cross field balls played in behind the Shrewsbury full backs. |  | | |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 14:18 - Sep 2 with 1492 views | ITFCBlues |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 14:14 - Sep 2 by TRUE_BLUE123 |
ATM. No.
Purely because the system is wrong for him as it is for Judge, as it is for Nolan.
He may be able to do a job on the left hand side of midfield over Judge. He is probably more suited for that role than Judge is. |
Don't Peterborough also play 442? |  |
| |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 14:21 - Sep 2 with 1465 views | TRUE_BLUE123 |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 14:18 - Sep 2 by ITFCBlues |
Don't Peterborough also play 442? |
I think its a variation, with an advanced Midfielder?? Whereas, we tend to have a flatter 442, with Downes running from deep? | |
| |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 14:21 - Sep 2 with 1465 views | SWGF |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 14:18 - Sep 2 by ITFCBlues |
Don't Peterborough also play 442? |
Played diamond against us |  |
| |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 15:31 - Sep 2 with 1270 views | Bluefish |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 14:21 - Sep 2 by SWGF |
Played diamond against us |
I thought he was very ordinary against us and at times poor. He also looks like a c*** |  |
| |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 15:33 - Sep 2 with 1265 views | OsborneOneNil |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 15:31 - Sep 2 by Bluefish |
I thought he was very ordinary against us and at times poor. He also looks like a c*** |
Some player though, seen his last 2 goals? |  | | |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 15:39 - Sep 2 with 1232 views | Bluefish |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 15:33 - Sep 2 by OsborneOneNil |
Some player though, seen his last 2 goals? |
Nope. There is no doubt the talent is there but the attitude gets in the way, a Tom Lawrence or Bersant Celina situation. Darragh had been trying to get the money for him for years having promised a move but no club will take him on | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 15:46 - Sep 2 with 1195 views | OsborneOneNil |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 15:39 - Sep 2 by Bluefish |
Nope. There is no doubt the talent is there but the attitude gets in the way, a Tom Lawrence or Bersant Celina situation. Darragh had been trying to get the money for him for years having promised a move but no club will take him on |
Yeah, seems a right tool. Check his goals v MK and also Sunderland. | | | |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 16:43 - Sep 2 with 1108 views | strikalite |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 14:21 - Sep 2 by SWGF |
Played diamond against us |
He was head of the diamond on Saturday too, played well, wand of a left foot, one minute you'll love him but the next two minutes you'll hate him...Sunderland wanted him over the summer, but Mr Fry put a massive price tag on him..
If Maddison just kept on his feet rather than constantly diving he'd be a far better player.. |  | | |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 16:56 - Sep 2 with 1063 views | TrueBlueLikeKevinBru |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 14:14 - Sep 2 by TRUE_BLUE123 |
ATM. No.
Purely because the system is wrong for him as it is for Judge, as it is for Nolan.
He may be able to do a job on the left hand side of midfield over Judge. He is probably more suited for that role than Judge is. |
His the best player in the lg! someone of his quality would 100% get into are side. was the best player on the pitch by a mile when we played posh couple weeks ago & has carried that form on. | | | |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 17:00 - Sep 2 with 1047 views | Mullet |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 16:56 - Sep 2 by TrueBlueLikeKevinBru |
His the best player in the lg! someone of his quality would 100% get into are side. was the best player on the pitch by a mile when we played posh couple weeks ago & has carried that form on. |
Are you confused? He looks and plays nothing like Cole Skuse. |  |
| |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 18:37 - Sep 2 with 916 views | lmfcblue |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 14:17 - Sep 2 by IpswichKnight |
I thought we went much more like a diamond when Nolan came on, we definitely looked a lot more composed and happy to go though the middle once he came on instead of the ( successful ) cross field balls played in behind the Shrewsbury full backs. |
Nolan played just off Norwood when he came on so a 4.4.1.1. | | | |
| Would Peterborough's Maddison get in our starting 11? on 18:52 - Sep 2 with 874 views | BloomBlue |
No. Although if he was lucky enough the best player in the league, Downes, would create loads of scoring chances for him. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
