| Chalobah 16:12 - Jul 31 with 1011 views | Wickets |
Anyone any idea how much his loan fee was likely to have been? |  | | |  |
| Chalobah on 16:13 - Jul 31 with 1003 views | SitfcB |
£2,500,000. |  |
| |
| Chalobah on 16:17 - Jul 31 with 981 views | DanFord |
| Chalobah on 16:13 - Jul 31 by SitfcB |
£2,500,000. |
Wouldn't be surprised if we've paid something like £100,000 plus agreed to cover his wages. It wouldn't have been much as I can't see Hurst making him his first signing before we knew Webster and Knight were going and spending what would have been a large chunk of the budget. |  |
| |
| Chalobah on 16:21 - Jul 31 with 949 views | itfcjoe |
£5-600k as a guess which would include his wages of about £8k a week |  |
| |
| Chalobah on 16:23 - Jul 31 with 923 views | suffolkpoker |
£500k #definfo |  |
| |
| Chalobah on 16:25 - Jul 31 with 902 views | DanFord |
| Chalobah on 16:21 - Jul 31 by itfcjoe |
£5-600k as a guess which would include his wages of about £8k a week |
I can't see Hurst, who spends it like it's his own money, spending £500k on a teenager for a season, when that almost buys you an Edwards or Harrison. I wouldn't see him even doing that with the Waghorn money, let alone as his first move in the transfer market when we were £4.5m worse off than when we signed Edwards and Harrison. Surely it has to be lower. Can't imagine it was any more than £250k absolute maximum as a flat fee. £8k a week over the season plus the loan fee probably does come out at £600k including wages. [Post edited 31 Jul 2018 16:26]
| |
| |
| Chalobah on 16:28 - Jul 31 with 870 views | homer_123 |
| Chalobah on 16:25 - Jul 31 by DanFord |
I can't see Hurst, who spends it like it's his own money, spending £500k on a teenager for a season, when that almost buys you an Edwards or Harrison. I wouldn't see him even doing that with the Waghorn money, let alone as his first move in the transfer market when we were £4.5m worse off than when we signed Edwards and Harrison. Surely it has to be lower. Can't imagine it was any more than £250k absolute maximum as a flat fee. £8k a week over the season plus the loan fee probably does come out at £600k including wages. [Post edited 31 Jul 2018 16:26]
|
Easily over £500k when you factor in both wages and a likely fee for the loan. |  |
| |
| Chalobah on 16:31 - Jul 31 with 852 views | itfcjoe |
| Chalobah on 16:25 - Jul 31 by DanFord |
I can't see Hurst, who spends it like it's his own money, spending £500k on a teenager for a season, when that almost buys you an Edwards or Harrison. I wouldn't see him even doing that with the Waghorn money, let alone as his first move in the transfer market when we were £4.5m worse off than when we signed Edwards and Harrison. Surely it has to be lower. Can't imagine it was any more than £250k absolute maximum as a flat fee. £8k a week over the season plus the loan fee probably does come out at £600k including wages. [Post edited 31 Jul 2018 16:26]
|
So do you agree that fee and wages likely come out around £600k?
It's not that big a chunk of the budget - playing budget in recent years is around £18m so it's about 1/30th of the playing budget | |
| |
| Chalobah on 16:34 - Jul 31 with 835 views | DanFord |
| Chalobah on 16:31 - Jul 31 by itfcjoe |
So do you agree that fee and wages likely come out around £600k?
It's not that big a chunk of the budget - playing budget in recent years is around £18m so it's about 1/30th of the playing budget |
Yeah. I started off replying to the £500k def info and ended up agreeing with you. £400k wages and £200k loan fee sounds about right. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
