6 subs 21:45 - Feb 20 with 3328 views | AK74 | We've made 6 subs by my reckoning. | | | | |
6 subs on 21:47 - Feb 20 with 3276 views | Sharkey | Sporting Life website agrees with you | | | |
6 subs on 21:51 - Feb 20 with 3190 views | rkc123 | Yeah we have, I can't see any reason why that would be allowed? Surely the fourth official is responsible for keeping track of that sort of thing? | | | |
6 subs on 21:55 - Feb 20 with 2969 views | Swansea_Blue | Er, yeah. Surely that’s a fk up and will cost us? | |
| |
6 subs on 21:55 - Feb 20 with 2871 views | Samuelowen88 | Rotherham concussion sub, in 1st half. Allows both teams to have a 6th sub | |
| |
6 subs on 21:56 - Feb 20 with 2818 views | brazil1982 | How on earth has anyone - management and officials - allowed this. Could be serious. | | | |
6 subs on 21:57 - Feb 20 with 2724 views | brazil1982 |
6 subs on 21:55 - Feb 20 by Samuelowen88 | Rotherham concussion sub, in 1st half. Allows both teams to have a 6th sub |
Impressive knowledge! | | | |
6 subs on 21:57 - Feb 20 with 2676 views | rkc123 |
6 subs on 21:55 - Feb 20 by Samuelowen88 | Rotherham concussion sub, in 1st half. Allows both teams to have a 6th sub |
I knew there must be a reason, McKenna isn't going to make a mistake like that. | | | | Login to get fewer ads
6 subs on 22:12 - Feb 20 with 2114 views | AK74 |
Phew! (for the second time tonight) | | | |
6 subs on 22:25 - Feb 20 with 1878 views | Ryorry |
If a law had been inadvertantly broken & not spotted by the match officials at the time, there should be an equalizing law which says that the stupidest error made by the ref should be nullified. In other words, their penalty should have been ruled out. | |
| |
6 subs on 22:29 - Feb 20 with 1811 views | Nutkins_Return |
This was an old trial though no? It's not still going on is it? | | | |
6 subs on 22:36 - Feb 20 with 1696 views | Pinewoodblue |
Clearly I was wrong believing that although the rules allowed a 6th substitution the 3 window rules applied. | |
| |
6 subs on 22:39 - Feb 20 with 1657 views | Vic |
6 subs on 21:55 - Feb 20 by Samuelowen88 | Rotherham concussion sub, in 1st half. Allows both teams to have a 6th sub |
In which case, well done KM for knowing the rules and making use of all the subs we could - hopefully giving a bit of rest to another player before Saturday. | |
| |
6 subs on 22:44 - Feb 20 with 1553 views | Pinewoodblue |
6 subs on 22:12 - Feb 20 by AK74 | Phew! (for the second time tonight) |
Think there were a few more phews than that. | |
| |
6 subs on 22:48 - Feb 20 with 1482 views | textbackup |
6 subs on 21:55 - Feb 20 by Samuelowen88 | Rotherham concussion sub, in 1st half. Allows both teams to have a 6th sub |
So because rotherham had a concussion, we get an extra sub?? Never knew that | |
| |
6 subs on 22:52 - Feb 20 with 1418 views | Swansea_Blue |
6 subs on 22:29 - Feb 20 by Nutkins_Return | This was an old trial though no? It's not still going on is it? |
It must either still be going on or has been adopted. Otherwise we're in the 💩! | |
| |
6 subs on 22:53 - Feb 20 with 1398 views | StevieH |
6 subs on 22:48 - Feb 20 by textbackup | So because rotherham had a concussion, we get an extra sub?? Never knew that |
Yeah. The reasoning behind it is the team who have the concussed player get an additional sub as part of player protection, and to prevent an unfair advantage (e.g. an extra player with fresh legs) the opposition get an extra sub too | | | |
6 subs on 22:54 - Feb 20 with 1389 views | Ryorry |
6 subs on 22:52 - Feb 20 by Swansea_Blue | It must either still be going on or has been adopted. Otherwise we're in the 💩! |
If the match officials don't spot an inadvertant error at the time & stop it happening, that's on them - the matter should rest there. | |
| |
6 subs on 23:03 - Feb 20 with 1277 views | Trequartista | It's allowed if you lend another sub to the other team and Rotherham brought on Cameron Humphreys. | |
| |
6 subs on 23:05 - Feb 20 with 1258 views | Ryorry |
6 subs on 23:03 - Feb 20 by Trequartista | It's allowed if you lend another sub to the other team and Rotherham brought on Cameron Humphreys. |
Ouch!! | |
| |
6 subs on 23:07 - Feb 20 with 1207 views | Nutkins_Return |
6 subs on 22:52 - Feb 20 by Swansea_Blue | It must either still be going on or has been adopted. Otherwise we're in the 💩! |
Looks like it's ok. I was panicking reading that there was annoyance trial not extended however this was for temp subs. Looks like perm concussion subs is a thing now. Didn't know this full rule to be honest!! And we still looked knackered!! | | | |
| |