Forum | Red a bit harsh? by FrimleyBlue

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Red a bit harsh? 22:26 - May 6 with 1982 views

ðŸ«£ðŸ«£ðŸ«£ https://t.co/ORFTKU9ArI pic.twitter.com/6Psfs3ciQc
— Brad (@BradleySweeney) May 6, 2023

	Waka waka eh eh
Poll:	We've had Kuqi v Pablo.. so Broadhead or Celina?
Blog:	Marcus Evans Needs Our Support Not to Be Hounded Out

Red a bit harsh? on 22:33 - May 6 with 1867 views

J2BLUE

Should be an assault charge. That was clearly targeted.

	Truly impaired.
Poll:	Will you buying a Super Blues membership?

Red a bit harsh? on 22:42 - May 6 with 1835 views

iamatractorboy

Not one player goes to check on the poor victim!

Red a bit harsh? on 23:25 - May 6 with 1714 views

MattinLondon

Red a bit harsh? on 22:33 - May 6 by J2BLUE
Should be an assault charge. That was clearly targeted.

Judging by the way he peacocked to the crowd straight after the “tackle”, I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the victim had made him look like a complete donkey throughout that match.

As you said, he was clearly targeted.

The tackler deserves at least a ban until January 2024.

Red a bit harsh? on 04:13 - May 7 with 1500 views

BlueBadger

Red a bit harsh? on 23:25 - May 6 by MattinLondon
Judging by the way he peacocked to the crowd straight after the “tackle”, I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the victim had made him look like a complete donkey throughout that match. As you said, he was clearly targeted. The tackler deserves at least a ban until January 2024.

The bloke following him on aiming a kick at his head deserves a card at least, as well.

	I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Poll:	Do we still want KM to be our manager
Blog:	From Despair to Where?