Forum | Surely we are more suited to 3-5-2? by reusersfreekicks

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Surely we are more suited to 3-5-2? 22:28 - Nov 5 with 715 views

Wingbacks amongst our best players
We don't have decent wingers
We have a surplus of good central midfielders so let's get 3 on the pitch and play through midfield
Dodgy central defence will be more secure
Still get to play 2 up front

Surely we are more suited to 3-5-2? on 22:30 - Nov 5 with 699 views

clive_baker

I thought today we might've lined up with that with KVY being out, and Edwards is clearly more comfortable going forward, but we got the job done. Onto the next one...

COYB

Poll:	Will Boris Johnson be PM this time next week?
Blog:	[Blog] Team Spirit Holds the Key

Surely we are more suited to 3-5-2? on 22:33 - Nov 5 with 682 views

MrTown

Maybe personal wise, but we can’t play it. We get exposed by semi decent sides on the wing areas, never revert back to it for me unless we are matching up against someone.

Poll:

Would love to know the opinions on here now of Lambert genuinely?

Surely we are more suited to 3-5-2? on 22:47 - Nov 5 with 639 views

Herbivore

Our CBs aren't mobile enough or good enough on the ball and we are unbalanced by having no natural left sided CB. Steer clear. We've been poorer in a three at the back whenever we've used it this season.

Poll:	Should someone on benefits earn more than David Cameron?
Blog:	Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread