Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Looks like 06:24 - Jun 12 with 1660 viewsGuthrum

As predicted, KJU and DJT are getting on famously. Hopefully will result in a positive outcome for the Korean peninsula.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

2
Looks like on 08:41 - Jun 12 with 1529 viewshomer_123

Clearly we hope it will. It will, however, end in tears...or worse.

Ade Akinbiyi couldn't hit a cows arse with a banjo...
Poll: As things stand, how confident are you we will get promoted this season?

0
Looks like on 08:44 - Jun 12 with 1513 viewsBlueNomad

Trump is clearing the decks for war with Canada!
0
Looks like on 09:10 - Jun 12 with 1499 viewsBlueBadger

Looks like on 08:41 - Jun 12 by homer_123

Clearly we hope it will. It will, however, end in tears...or worse.


For what it's worth, I reckon the two Fevered Egos meeting is just the PR exercise. the real work will have been done by grown-ups, weeks ago.
[Post edited 12 Jun 2018 9:10]

I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Poll: What will Phil's first headline be tomorrow?
Blog: From Despair to Where?

0
Looks like on 09:59 - Jun 12 with 1473 viewsGuthrum

Looks like on 08:41 - Jun 12 by homer_123

Clearly we hope it will. It will, however, end in tears...or worse.


What are the drivers for failure, in the short-to-medium term? Virtually everyone is happy to see detente between North Korea and its old enemies.

Trump has a diplomatic coup to wave around. Pyongyang wants recognition plus a path to easing sanctions, increased prosperity and diminuation of external threats, in exchange for which they're quite prepared to trade the very expensive and largely pointless (except as a bargaining chip) nuclear programme. The South Korean government of Moon Jae In - the main driver and facilitator of this process - is delighted. Beijing, with its eyes on the South China Sea, is only too happy to see a problem on their northern flank disappear, especially if it reduces the number of US troops based in the region. Even for Putin this outcome is better than many other possibilities, in a country with which Russia shares quite a sensitive border.

The only possibly unhappy people will be some right-wing nationalists who like to use NK as a bogeyman, such as the disgraced and jailed former SK President Park Geun Hye and Abe of Japan (whose government is reeling from a corruption scandal and may not be around much longer). Even the latter would probably be pleased to see missile tests no longer being fired over his country.

There are some traditionalist hard-line US Republicans, who would object to any kind of deal with a still communist former enemy and nominal Chinese ally (if Trump falls and is replaced by Pence, that could be the real threat to this detente). Also some Democrats for whom the lack of immediate progress on human rights would be enough to upset the apple cart.

All this unlike the Iran nuclear deal, in which the achievement belonged to Trump's predecessor and badly upset a couple of influential allies (Israel and Saudi Arabia).
[Post edited 12 Jun 2018 10:03]

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
Looks like on 10:05 - Jun 12 with 1458 viewsGuthrum

Looks like on 08:44 - Jun 12 by BlueNomad

Trump is clearing the decks for war with Canada!


They tried invading Canada before. Ended up with someone burning the White House down.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
Looks like on 10:07 - Jun 12 with 1456 viewschicoazul

Looks like on 09:10 - Jun 12 by BlueBadger

For what it's worth, I reckon the two Fevered Egos meeting is just the PR exercise. the real work will have been done by grown-ups, weeks ago.
[Post edited 12 Jun 2018 9:10]


You think there are grown ups in North Korea?

In the spirit of reconciliation and happiness at the end of the Banter Era (RIP) and as a result of promotion I have cleared out my ignore list. Look forwards to reading your posts!
Poll: With Evans taking 65% in Huddersfield, is the Banter Era over?

0
Looks like on 10:08 - Jun 12 with 1455 viewsblueislander

Looks like on 09:59 - Jun 12 by Guthrum

What are the drivers for failure, in the short-to-medium term? Virtually everyone is happy to see detente between North Korea and its old enemies.

Trump has a diplomatic coup to wave around. Pyongyang wants recognition plus a path to easing sanctions, increased prosperity and diminuation of external threats, in exchange for which they're quite prepared to trade the very expensive and largely pointless (except as a bargaining chip) nuclear programme. The South Korean government of Moon Jae In - the main driver and facilitator of this process - is delighted. Beijing, with its eyes on the South China Sea, is only too happy to see a problem on their northern flank disappear, especially if it reduces the number of US troops based in the region. Even for Putin this outcome is better than many other possibilities, in a country with which Russia shares quite a sensitive border.

The only possibly unhappy people will be some right-wing nationalists who like to use NK as a bogeyman, such as the disgraced and jailed former SK President Park Geun Hye and Abe of Japan (whose government is reeling from a corruption scandal and may not be around much longer). Even the latter would probably be pleased to see missile tests no longer being fired over his country.

There are some traditionalist hard-line US Republicans, who would object to any kind of deal with a still communist former enemy and nominal Chinese ally (if Trump falls and is replaced by Pence, that could be the real threat to this detente). Also some Democrats for whom the lack of immediate progress on human rights would be enough to upset the apple cart.

All this unlike the Iran nuclear deal, in which the achievement belonged to Trump's predecessor and badly upset a couple of influential allies (Israel and Saudi Arabia).
[Post edited 12 Jun 2018 10:03]


I can't help thinking that the whole thing is a PR exercise. It takes the spotlight off Trump's performance at the G7, and gives Kim some nternational kudos. It could help North Korea's failing economy I guess, but there is not going to be any concrete committments from either side, just vague hopes of progress, which, after all , is better than bombing each other.
0
Looks like on 10:10 - Jun 12 with 1447 viewschicoazul

Looks like on 10:05 - Jun 12 by Guthrum

They tried invading Canada before. Ended up with someone burning the White House down.


Canadians, according to Trump.

In the spirit of reconciliation and happiness at the end of the Banter Era (RIP) and as a result of promotion I have cleared out my ignore list. Look forwards to reading your posts!
Poll: With Evans taking 65% in Huddersfield, is the Banter Era over?

0
Login to get fewer ads

Looks like on 10:24 - Jun 12 with 1430 viewsGuthrum

Looks like on 10:08 - Jun 12 by blueislander

I can't help thinking that the whole thing is a PR exercise. It takes the spotlight off Trump's performance at the G7, and gives Kim some nternational kudos. It could help North Korea's failing economy I guess, but there is not going to be any concrete committments from either side, just vague hopes of progress, which, after all , is better than bombing each other.


But successful progress tends to happen in steps, not great leaps.

Compare with Iraq, where forced, wholesale, instant change of regime and governmental type was attempted. 15 years later, the mess is still being cleared up, with many tens of thousands dead in the interim. Pretty similar with a lot of revolutions, too.

Easing of sanctions will help the NK economy greatly, as will not spending money on nuclear and missile programmes. Also strengthens Kim Jong Un's position vis-a-vis the army, will allow him more leeway to move away from the "military first" position he inherited from his father. Possibly towards the Chinese model of centrally managed quasi-capitalism which has been so successful.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
Looks like on 10:27 - Jun 12 with 1429 viewsJ2BLUE

People are desperate to take credit away from Trump. He has done extremely well. It's just an official first step. Both sides need to stick to whatever they've agreed to but he has done as much as he can at this point.

Truly impaired.
Poll: Will you buying a Super Blues membership?

1
Looks like on 12:52 - Jun 12 with 1366 viewsKitman

Looks like on 10:10 - Jun 12 by chicoazul

Canadians, according to Trump.


Anything Hollywood does, he can do better. He's taken to re-writing history now

Blog: [Blog] Interesting Start to the New Season

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2024