| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. 08:46 - Jan 21 with 4263 views | ITFCBlues |
|  |
| |  |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 08:51 - Jan 21 with 3862 views | Kieran_Knows |
I’ll be amazed if it doesn’t get done. They’re not going to walk away from the best part of almost £1.5m when he’s out of contract in 6 months and they’ve got no interest in triggering the years option in his deal. |  |
| |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:01 - Jan 21 with 3723 views | ITFCBlues |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 08:51 - Jan 21 by Kieran_Knows |
I’ll be amazed if it doesn’t get done. They’re not going to walk away from the best part of almost £1.5m when he’s out of contract in 6 months and they’ve got no interest in triggering the years option in his deal. |
Quite, I'd say it's nailed on. Probably just trying to force our hand with paying a bit more or even trying to sort their own replacement out.
But as you say, not a chance they'll turn down 1.5m. | |
| |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:06 - Jan 21 with 3637 views | Dubtractor |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:01 - Jan 21 by ITFCBlues |
Quite, I'd say it's nailed on. Probably just trying to force our hand with paying a bit more or even trying to sort their own replacement out.
But as you say, not a chance they'll turn down 1.5m. |
Good that they got another 70 minutes out him yesterday too - building up his match fitness for us! |  |
| |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:07 - Jan 21 with 3631 views | tractorboy1978 |
He's also saying Blackburn want Rajovic but Watford want £4m. I think that shows you how hard signing a striker is in this window. Whatever way you cut it, eventually we are going to have to pay what we consider over the odds to get someone. And we need two really! |  | | |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:12 - Jan 21 with 3520 views | strikalite |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:06 - Jan 21 by Dubtractor |
Good that they got another 70 minutes out him yesterday too - building up his match fitness for us! |
That's the bit I don't get, why would they risk that? |  | | |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:14 - Jan 21 with 3487 views | ITFCBlues |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:12 - Jan 21 by strikalite |
That's the bit I don't get, why would they risk that? |
Because by not playing him, you'd suggest that weakens their hand somewwhat | |
| |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:18 - Jan 21 with 3430 views | PhilTWTD |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 08:51 - Jan 21 by Kieran_Knows |
I’ll be amazed if it doesn’t get done. They’re not going to walk away from the best part of almost £1.5m when he’s out of contract in 6 months and they’ve got no interest in triggering the years option in his deal. |
Think you're probably right but was nothing happening on it as of a couple of days ago. |  | | |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:23 - Jan 21 with 3359 views | ITFCBlues |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:18 - Jan 21 by PhilTWTD |
Think you're probably right but was nothing happening on it as of a couple of days ago. |
1.5m doesn't look too bad when you consider Rhys Healey went to Huddersfield for circa 2m this week.
Seems the market for strikers is so scarce that it's really driven fees right up. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:33 - Jan 21 with 3182 views | Kieran_Knows |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:18 - Jan 21 by PhilTWTD |
Think you're probably right but was nothing happening on it as of a couple of days ago. |
Indeed, and probably why he started yesterday. They don’t play until next Monday now either, so think it’ll be an interesting week this one. | |
| |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:37 - Jan 21 with 3109 views | Nutkins_Return |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:23 - Jan 21 by ITFCBlues |
1.5m doesn't look too bad when you consider Rhys Healey went to Huddersfield for circa 2m this week.
Seems the market for strikers is so scarce that it's really driven fees right up. |
That's interesting. Surprised he was available. Wouldn't have minded us looking at him and not an awful price given what he achieved in France. Strange how little game time he got. | | | |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:45 - Jan 21 with 2996 views | PhilTWTD |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:33 - Jan 21 by Kieran_Knows |
Indeed, and probably why he started yesterday. They don’t play until next Monday now either, so think it’ll be an interesting week this one. |
That is a good indication that's nothing close as it stands. As you say, it has the hallmarks of a deal which will eventually get done. Player wants to come here, Town want him, Blackburn probably need to get him off their books in this window. | | | |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:48 - Jan 21 with 2928 views | Mullet |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:45 - Jan 21 by PhilTWTD |
That is a good indication that's nothing close as it stands. As you say, it has the hallmarks of a deal which will eventually get done. Player wants to come here, Town want him, Blackburn probably need to get him off their books in this window. |
Also gonna have his best mate Travis in his ear innit. |  |
| |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 10:05 - Jan 21 with 2769 views | GavTWTD |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:48 - Jan 21 by Mullet |
Also gonna have his best mate Travis in his ear innit. |
Do we know they are best mates? The year extension could be triggered so they can make some money from him in the summer, but I do agree he seems the most likely to join us. Any more on Moore?
Leif seems to be getting a lot of bandwidth on other sites today but MAwould have to get busy at the end of the window. |  |
| |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 10:34 - Jan 21 with 2515 views | RegencyBlue |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:14 - Jan 21 by ITFCBlues |
Because by not playing him, you'd suggest that weakens their hand somewwhat |
Against that he could pick up an injury which kills any deal and leaves him on their books for the foreseeable future.
January is a sellers market and every club knows we are desperate for a striker, if not two. If we really want this guy we are going to have to pay over the odds is my guess, as we are for any other striker probably. Time is running out so our wriggle room is lessening by the day. |  | | |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 11:00 - Jan 21 with 2339 views | franz_tyson |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:07 - Jan 21 by tractorboy1978 |
He's also saying Blackburn want Rajovic but Watford want £4m. I think that shows you how hard signing a striker is in this window. Whatever way you cut it, eventually we are going to have to pay what we consider over the odds to get someone. And we need two really! |
If Blackburn are after a player who's valued by his club at £4million - how hard up are they? Doesn't make sense to me. I got the impression Blackburn have some financial issues and that's why we were able to get our hands on Travis.
If the Rajovic interest is real, then Blackburn can't be that much in trouble financially. | | | |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 11:06 - Jan 21 with 2274 views | textbackup |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 09:06 - Jan 21 by Dubtractor |
Good that they got another 70 minutes out him yesterday too - building up his match fitness for us! |
On the other hand sht because we are in desperate need of him to be here playing for us Monday night |  |
| |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 11:47 - Jan 21 with 2059 views | Mullet |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 10:05 - Jan 21 by GavTWTD |
Do we know they are best mates? The year extension could be triggered so they can make some money from him in the summer, but I do agree he seems the most likely to join us. Any more on Moore?
Leif seems to be getting a lot of bandwidth on other sites today but MAwould have to get busy at the end of the window. |
Apparently so.
No idea on Moore. You'd think Phil would bother to tell you of all people. | |
| |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 11:56 - Jan 21 with 1991 views | GavTWTD |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 11:47 - Jan 21 by Mullet |
Apparently so.
No idea on Moore. You'd think Phil would bother to tell you of all people. |
I wasn't really asking you as such but no Phil doesn't volunteer much info unless I threaten to pinch his hobnobs. | |
| |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 12:02 - Jan 21 with 1932 views | Whos_blue |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 11:56 - Jan 21 by GavTWTD |
I wasn't really asking you as such but no Phil doesn't volunteer much info unless I threaten to pinch his hobnobs. |
Maybe you need to up the ante.
Hit him were it really hurts.
Threaten to pinch his cheese.
He'll fold like a deck if cards. |  |
| Distortion becomes somehow pure in its wildness. |
| |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 12:02 - Jan 21 with 1930 views | pointofblue |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 11:56 - Jan 21 by GavTWTD |
I wasn't really asking you as such but no Phil doesn't volunteer much info unless I threaten to pinch his hobnobs. |
Is that a euphemism? | |
| |
| Moore's agent has been.... on 12:21 - Jan 21 with 1821 views | Bloots |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 11:56 - Jan 21 by GavTWTD |
I wasn't really asking you as such but no Phil doesn't volunteer much info unless I threaten to pinch his hobnobs. |
...at the club in the last couple of weeks.
But so has Stansfield's so it doesn't really mean anything concrete.
Personally I think the Moore deal will get done, and possibly Gallagher too but I have zero info on that one. |  |
| Elite Level Poster: Elite Level Supporter: Elite Level Human |
| |
| Moore's agent has been.... on 12:50 - Jan 21 with 1666 views | Kieran_Knows |
| Moore's agent has been.... on 12:21 - Jan 21 by Bloots |
...at the club in the last couple of weeks.
But so has Stansfield's so it doesn't really mean anything concrete.
Personally I think the Moore deal will get done, and possibly Gallagher too but I have zero info on that one. |
Don’t know why, but I just don’t see it with Moore. I can’t imagine for one minute Ashton will want to get involved in some sort of bidding/wage war for him, and if Bournemouth know they’ve got several teams after him they’ll hang on till the last minute to see who’s most desperate and will pay the bulk of his (reportedly) 40k a week wages.
My guess for the remainder of the window is Gallagher, Johnson (Shef Wed) and 1 other that we’ve not even been linked with yet. | |
| |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 12:58 - Jan 21 with 1558 views | Stewart27 |
| Nixon suggesting we're still pushing for Gallagher.. on 11:06 - Jan 21 by textbackup |
On the other hand sht because we are in desperate need of him to be here playing for us Monday night |
With the way KM prepared and sets us up for games, I would say that any striker who wasn’t in this time last week would not be playing against Leicester and that he’s prepared for KJ up top.
I think maybe this is also why we are calm, as our next league game is after the window closes. | | | |
| I think he's only (ha!) on.... on 13:01 - Jan 21 with 1524 views | Bloots |
| Moore's agent has been.... on 12:50 - Jan 21 by Kieran_Knows |
Don’t know why, but I just don’t see it with Moore. I can’t imagine for one minute Ashton will want to get involved in some sort of bidding/wage war for him, and if Bournemouth know they’ve got several teams after him they’ll hang on till the last minute to see who’s most desperate and will pay the bulk of his (reportedly) 40k a week wages.
My guess for the remainder of the window is Gallagher, Johnson (Shef Wed) and 1 other that we’ve not even been linked with yet. |
...£18k a week.
Originally I was reasonably indifferent to the thought of him coming in, but I've warmed to it and would be quite keen now.
Maybe that's just desperation, but I think there's a lot more to his game than just being a target man and he's plainly vastly improved since we last saw him here. | |
| Elite Level Poster: Elite Level Supporter: Elite Level Human |
| |
| I think he's only (ha!) on.... on 13:09 - Jan 21 with 1462 views | Kieran_Knows |
| I think he's only (ha!) on.... on 13:01 - Jan 21 by Bloots |
...£18k a week.
Originally I was reasonably indifferent to the thought of him coming in, but I've warmed to it and would be quite keen now.
Maybe that's just desperation, but I think there's a lot more to his game than just being a target man and he's plainly vastly improved since we last saw him here. |
Wouldn’t get out of bed for that! 
No you’re right, I don’t think he’s a bad player and he’s had a bloody good career. Just don’t think he’s the ideal man to replace Hirst. When you look at someone like Gallagher, he seems a more carbon copy of Hirst, with an added bit of experience.
I’m not adverse to Moore signing though, and trust McKenna that if he feels he’s the man to get us up, then so be it! Interesting last 9/10 days left! | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
