| Surprised the red card has got rescinded 17:49 - Mar 4 with 1258 views | SitfcB |
|  |
| |  |
| Surprised the red card has got rescinded on 17:50 - Mar 4 with 1212 views | ElderGrizzly |
Genuine attempt is so subjective. One person's attempt is another's lost cause |  | | |
| Surprised the red card has got rescinded on 17:51 - Mar 4 with 1205 views | SitfcB |
| Surprised the red card has got rescinded on 17:50 - Mar 4 by ElderGrizzly |
Genuine attempt is so subjective. One person's attempt is another's lost cause |
Accrington manager said he was gonna be in the phone to Mike Jones (sounds familiar) so reckon he’s just done him a favour. | |
| |
| Surprised the red card has got rescinded on 18:22 - Mar 4 with 1022 views | jayessess |
If you watch the video, when Conneely starts to go to ground the ball's well within his reach, Parrott then touches it on before he gets there. Nice slice of luck for us to get the decision. |  |
| |
| Surprised the red card has got rescinded on 18:33 - Mar 4 with 947 views | Pablokuqi |
| Surprised the red card has got rescinded on 18:22 - Mar 4 by jayessess |
If you watch the video, when Conneely starts to go to ground the ball's well within his reach, Parrott then touches it on before he gets there. Nice slice of luck for us to get the decision. |
I said at the time I thought it was a genuine attempt within
the interpretation of the law and was surprised he gave a red. Lots on here disagreed. In that situation defender deserves to be given the benefit of the doubt. Bit of luck for us especially as we missed the pen. |  | | |
| Surprised the red card has got rescinded on 19:28 - Mar 4 with 807 views | southnorfolkblue |
| Surprised the red card has got rescinded on 17:50 - Mar 4 by ElderGrizzly |
Genuine attempt is so subjective. One person's attempt is another's lost cause |
Which is why it’s surprising that it was overturned because I thought that they only overturned decisions that were blatantly wrong.. | |
| |
| Surprised the red card has got rescinded on 19:30 - Mar 4 with 798 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Agreed. Looked like the referee was close and had a clear view of it. From iFollow it appeared as if the only way Conneely gets the ball is to go through the back of Parrott.
At least we got the advantage of the decision going our way on the pitch for a change. |  |
| |
| Surprised the red card has got rescinded on 20:09 - Mar 4 with 720 views | Trequartista |
For years the game was crying out for the double jeopardy rule, but in true lawmakers style, they had to complicate things with this "intent" rule. I suppose we should be grateful they brought in the double jeopardy rule at all having seen how much they are ruining the game with handball/offside/var interpretations. |  |
| |
| Surprised the red card has got rescinded on 20:13 - Mar 4 with 713 views | Swansea_Blue |
I'm not. The laws of the game don't discriminate between a rubbish attempt to get the ball and a good attempt. And it wasn't violent enough to be a straight red card through excessive force. Double jeopardy ruling is there to protect when fouls aren't blatant cynical trips and other fouls where there's no obvious attempt to get the ball at all. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Surprised the red card has got rescinded on 20:15 - Mar 4 with 697 views | PhilTWTD |
| Surprised the red card has got rescinded on 20:13 - Mar 4 by Swansea_Blue |
I'm not. The laws of the game don't discriminate between a rubbish attempt to get the ball and a good attempt. And it wasn't violent enough to be a straight red card through excessive force. Double jeopardy ruling is there to protect when fouls aren't blatant cynical trips and other fouls where there's no obvious attempt to get the ball at all. |
That was my thought at the time, and most in the press box, although obviously most were covering Stanley. |  | | |
| Surprised the red card has got rescinded on 20:16 - Mar 4 with 685 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Surprised the red card has got rescinded on 20:15 - Mar 4 by PhilTWTD |
That was my thought at the time, and most in the press box, although obviously most were covering Stanley. |
Great minds you see Phil. We're a rare breed  | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
