| The Teddy Bishop debate 23:41 - Apr 4 with 7715 views | yungblue |
For me it is a no brainier, a young man of his age has so much potential and we shouldn’t be allowing him to leave because of a torrid time of injuries.
I believe a two year deal with an option, a proper pre season and we could see the best out of him in an attacking midfield role.
|  |
| |  |
| The Teddy Bishop debate on 10:22 - Apr 5 with 533 views | Currie10 |
| The Teddy Bishop debate on 09:36 - Apr 5 by maccyd9 |
I know for a fact Chambo is well over £10k and Didz too.
I really don't care anyway, but previous posts suggesting he's on £6k are laughable.
This all detracts from the original post anyway RE Bishop.
My take, plenty of ability, far more questions. Give him a year to prove himself on an appearance based salary and see what happens.
Some players bodies are just not meant for the rigours of football and that's what often sets average players apart from far more naturally talented players. |
Of course Dids is too, or the Leicester deal would have certainly gone through. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
