Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
VAR question 17:15 - Feb 2 with 2715 viewsPinewoodblue

Watching Spurs v Man City. Ref doesn’t give a penalty but VAR taking a look at it. Full two minutes before ball goes out of play and Penalty awarded. Does that two minutes get added on.

If you’re not watching Loris saved the penalty, but second VAR review for a possible second penalty for foul by lLoris, not awarded but 2 yellows for the scrummage that’s followed.

2023 year of destiny
Poll: Dickhead "Noun" a stupid, irritating, or ridiculous man.

0
VAR question on 17:38 - Feb 2 with 2648 viewsSitfcB

No, because the ball was in play.

Plus it never went out, Mike Dean blew up when the City keeper got it. May as well have just blown up when it happened for VAR to check.

COYB
Poll: What will today’s 10 pager be
Blog: [Blog] One Year On

0
VAR question on 18:34 - Feb 2 with 2586 viewsStochesStotasBlewe

VAR question on 17:38 - Feb 2 by SitfcB

No, because the ball was in play.

Plus it never went out, Mike Dean blew up when the City keeper got it. May as well have just blown up when it happened for VAR to check.


So if Spurs had scored in that 2 minutes and 8 seconds, the "goal" would be retrospectively dissalowed then?

We have no village green, or a shop. It's very, very quiet. I can walk to the pub.

1
VAR question on 18:36 - Feb 2 with 2581 viewsSwansea_Blue

Any chance they can take a look at Ruud van Nistlerooy’s dive?

VAR is getting silly - think they need to pause and have a proper review of how it’s working (or not).

Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

3
VAR question on 19:37 - Feb 2 with 2529 viewsbahri

VAR question on 18:34 - Feb 2 by StochesStotasBlewe

So if Spurs had scored in that 2 minutes and 8 seconds, the "goal" would be retrospectively dissalowed then?


Yes.
Utter madness

redandella

1
VAR question on 19:43 - Feb 2 with 2522 viewsStochesStotasBlewe

VAR question on 19:37 - Feb 2 by bahri

Yes.
Utter madness


Thanks. Had a feeling that would be the outcome.

As you rightly point out, utter madness.

We have no village green, or a shop. It's very, very quiet. I can walk to the pub.

1
VAR question on 19:48 - Feb 2 with 2518 viewsRadlett_blue

VAR question on 17:38 - Feb 2 by SitfcB

No, because the ball was in play.

Plus it never went out, Mike Dean blew up when the City keeper got it. May as well have just blown up when it happened for VAR to check.


Stopping the game for 2 minutes when the ball is in play so that the TV ref can decide if there was a "clear & obvious error" would make a bad situation worse.

Poll: Should horse racing be banned in the UK?

0
VAR question on 21:33 - Feb 2 with 2433 viewsSenatorBlue

What would happen if say Man C had scored a goal in those 2 mins. Would VAR still happen, and award them a Penalty to potentially go two up?
0
VAR question on 21:55 - Feb 2 with 2400 viewsNthsuffolkblue

VAR question on 18:36 - Feb 2 by Swansea_Blue

Any chance they can take a look at Ruud van Nistlerooy’s dive?

VAR is getting silly - think they need to pause and have a proper review of how it’s working (or not).


That's a great shout. Every club should be able to get the worst half a dozen injustices in history looked at and put right. Then the points should all be readjusted and clubs reinstated in leagues or promoted or not as a result.

Actually, second thoughts the idea our current team might end up playing in the Premier League or the Championship, perhaps we are better off taking the hit!

Poll: Is Jeremy Clarkson misogynistic, racist or plain nasty?
Blog: [Blog] Ghostbusters

0
Login to get fewer ads

VAR question on 22:02 - Feb 2 with 2394 viewsNthsuffolkblue

VAR question on 17:38 - Feb 2 by SitfcB

No, because the ball was in play.

Plus it never went out, Mike Dean blew up when the City keeper got it. May as well have just blown up when it happened for VAR to check.


Of course that time should be added on. It did not count as actual play as the play was pulled back to the previous incident.

If a booking had occurred it would still have counted but nothing else would have done. No set piece, no goal, etc. This is the difference with advantage being played. If something had happened it would have counted and advantage is only played briefly until it is lost or the team failed to take advantage of it.

If the point of time allowed is to ensure fans see 90 minutes then I could see the argument that you don't get the time but if it is about ensuring the teams get the full 90 minutes to compete then it has to be added on along with the time it takes to make the VAR call.

Poll: Is Jeremy Clarkson misogynistic, racist or plain nasty?
Blog: [Blog] Ghostbusters

0
VAR question on 22:05 - Feb 2 with 2388 viewsBlueStreak

VAR question on 21:33 - Feb 2 by SenatorBlue

What would happen if say Man C had scored a goal in those 2 mins. Would VAR still happen, and award them a Penalty to potentially go two up?


Obviously not. The goal is given and no need for a VAR review. Been speaking with Joe about this tonight and they had to play on until the ball was basically 'dead'. VAR worked perfectly in this situation as avoided the howler. It took two minutes, so what? Would rather have that and get the obvious decision correct.
0
VAR question on 22:08 - Feb 2 with 2382 viewsNthsuffolkblue

VAR question on 22:05 - Feb 2 by BlueStreak

Obviously not. The goal is given and no need for a VAR review. Been speaking with Joe about this tonight and they had to play on until the ball was basically 'dead'. VAR worked perfectly in this situation as avoided the howler. It took two minutes, so what? Would rather have that and get the obvious decision correct.


Yes, and had Tottenham scored their goal would not have stood.

Poll: Is Jeremy Clarkson misogynistic, racist or plain nasty?
Blog: [Blog] Ghostbusters

0
VAR question on 22:23 - Feb 2 with 2368 viewsStochesStotasBlewe

VAR question on 21:55 - Feb 2 by Nthsuffolkblue

That's a great shout. Every club should be able to get the worst half a dozen injustices in history looked at and put right. Then the points should all be readjusted and clubs reinstated in leagues or promoted or not as a result.

Actually, second thoughts the idea our current team might end up playing in the Premier League or the Championship, perhaps we are better off taking the hit!


Helmut Schon is contacting the VAR referees from the other side as we speak.

We have no village green, or a shop. It's very, very quiet. I can walk to the pub.

0
VAR question on 22:24 - Feb 2 with 2362 viewsNthsuffolkblue

VAR question on 22:23 - Feb 2 by StochesStotasBlewe

Helmut Schon is contacting the VAR referees from the other side as we speak.


Isn't Dermot Gallagher the ultimate authority on it all now?

Poll: Is Jeremy Clarkson misogynistic, racist or plain nasty?
Blog: [Blog] Ghostbusters

0
VAR question on 22:26 - Feb 2 with 2358 viewslinhdi

VAR question on 21:55 - Feb 2 by Nthsuffolkblue

That's a great shout. Every club should be able to get the worst half a dozen injustices in history looked at and put right. Then the points should all be readjusted and clubs reinstated in leagues or promoted or not as a result.

Actually, second thoughts the idea our current team might end up playing in the Premier League or the Championship, perhaps we are better off taking the hit!


I would love to have our Play-Off SF v Bolton subjected to VAR retrospectively. They'd have been a man down even earlier, every other yellow / red would be confirmed and we'd be able to take the p1ss once again!!!
0
VAR question on 22:26 - Feb 2 with 2356 viewsStochesStotasBlewe

VAR question on 22:24 - Feb 2 by Nthsuffolkblue

Isn't Dermot Gallagher the ultimate authority on it all now?


Look up Helmut Schon dear chap

We have no village green, or a shop. It's very, very quiet. I can walk to the pub.

2
VAR question on 22:35 - Feb 2 with 2343 viewsjaykay

VAR question on 18:34 - Feb 2 by StochesStotasBlewe

So if Spurs had scored in that 2 minutes and 8 seconds, the "goal" would be retrospectively dissalowed then?


a bit like liverpool v southamton yesterday. southamton had a penalty appeal and liverpool broke and scored while this was going on

forensic experts say footers and spruces fingerprints were not found at the scene after the weekends rows

0
VAR question on 22:41 - Feb 2 with 2336 viewsfooters

Next year there'll be all kinds of scientists with Bunsen burners and trundle wheels on the touchlines in support of this VAR.

When will the madness end? Presumably robot refs who look like Henry hoovers, dispensing yellow and red cards from the nozzle.

Insanity.

footers KC - Private Counsel to Big Farmer - Friend to all
Poll: Battle of the breakfast potato... who wins?

0
VAR question on 22:50 - Feb 2 with 2317 viewsNthsuffolkblue

VAR question on 22:26 - Feb 2 by StochesStotasBlewe

Look up Helmut Schon dear chap


Oh, got you. Sorry! I actually thought he was some clairvoyant or something!
[Post edited 2 Feb 2020 22:50]

Poll: Is Jeremy Clarkson misogynistic, racist or plain nasty?
Blog: [Blog] Ghostbusters

1
VAR question on 08:38 - Feb 3 with 2191 viewsRadlett_blue

VAR question on 22:02 - Feb 2 by Nthsuffolkblue

Of course that time should be added on. It did not count as actual play as the play was pulled back to the previous incident.

If a booking had occurred it would still have counted but nothing else would have done. No set piece, no goal, etc. This is the difference with advantage being played. If something had happened it would have counted and advantage is only played briefly until it is lost or the team failed to take advantage of it.

If the point of time allowed is to ensure fans see 90 minutes then I could see the argument that you don't get the time but if it is about ensuring the teams get the full 90 minutes to compete then it has to be added on along with the time it takes to make the VAR call.


Fans don;'t get to see 90 minutes because time is only added on for abnormal stoppages - goals, injuries & substitutions. Time is not added on for when a team takes a minute over a free kick, for example.

Poll: Should horse racing be banned in the UK?

0
VAR question on 09:03 - Feb 3 with 2157 viewsGarv

VAR is total crap, let’s have it right.

All stems from soft fouls and penalties being given, which is the fault of the referees for falling for it. If they took a firm stance and gave fewer fouls for meaningless 50/50s where there’s little or no chance of a goal anyway, I.e the attacker has not really lost out, we wouldn’t need all this. Football has basically eaten itself.

Poll: Pick a goal to win the derby in stoppage time...

1
VAR question on 09:51 - Feb 3 with 2139 viewsMercian

VAR question on 21:55 - Feb 2 by Nthsuffolkblue

That's a great shout. Every club should be able to get the worst half a dozen injustices in history looked at and put right. Then the points should all be readjusted and clubs reinstated in leagues or promoted or not as a result.

Actually, second thoughts the idea our current team might end up playing in the Premier League or the Championship, perhaps we are better off taking the hit!


I like the idea. Those two goals on the last day of the 81 season away at Boro need a very good look at. Not for internationals though, that would be a stupid idea.
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2024