| Oh Jeremy... on 18:35 - Mar 6 with 2475 views | lowhouseblue |
now, now, let's not start weaponizing his dishonesty. |  |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
|  |
| Oh Jeremy... on 18:36 - Mar 6 with 2467 views | SpruceMoose |
| Oh Jeremy... on 18:35 - Mar 6 by lowhouseblue |
now, now, let's not start weaponizing his dishonesty. |
Indeed. We can't expect him to start saying what he means, can we? |  |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| Oh Jeremy... on 20:11 - Mar 6 with 2355 views | jas0999 |
How anyone can support this man is beyond me. |  | | |
| Oh Jeremy... on 20:14 - Mar 6 with 2343 views | SpruceMoose |
| Oh Jeremy... on 20:11 - Mar 6 by jas0999 |
How anyone can support this man is beyond me. |
None of them deserve any support. On either side. | |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:07 - Mar 7 with 2228 views | ZedRodgers |
I don't really see much of an issue here. The whole process has been revamped, strengthened and separated from any other decision-making team since Formby took over.
All this leaded email suggests is that the leadership team asked be kept in the loop with an overview of anything that relates to elected MPs, councillors or candidates. What's the problem with that exactly? They weren't stepping in or making decisions as some people are making out.
Would it not have been worse if an email leak suggested the leadership team had said they don't want to be told about cases relating to elected members? The same people who praised Tom Watson for personally stepping in to present a number of cases to the leadership are now saying the leadership being made aware of cases is wrong.
Seeing people who for so long have condemned the leadership for 'turning a blind eye' or 'not doing anything' now accuse them of having too much involvement seems a touch hypocritical. Regardless, an email leak that suggests something was the way it was before it changed isn't much of a scoop. The leadership team asking to be copied into emails in the interim before a new General Secretary came in and completely reshaped things seems an odd thing to focus on to me. |  |
| |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:09 - Mar 7 with 2222 views | Steve_M |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:07 - Mar 7 by ZedRodgers |
I don't really see much of an issue here. The whole process has been revamped, strengthened and separated from any other decision-making team since Formby took over.
All this leaded email suggests is that the leadership team asked be kept in the loop with an overview of anything that relates to elected MPs, councillors or candidates. What's the problem with that exactly? They weren't stepping in or making decisions as some people are making out.
Would it not have been worse if an email leak suggested the leadership team had said they don't want to be told about cases relating to elected members? The same people who praised Tom Watson for personally stepping in to present a number of cases to the leadership are now saying the leadership being made aware of cases is wrong.
Seeing people who for so long have condemned the leadership for 'turning a blind eye' or 'not doing anything' now accuse them of having too much involvement seems a touch hypocritical. Regardless, an email leak that suggests something was the way it was before it changed isn't much of a scoop. The leadership team asking to be copied into emails in the interim before a new General Secretary came in and completely reshaped things seems an odd thing to focus on to me. |
Last week, the leadership team said they didn't intervene in complaints Zed. Another lie, more evidence that they don't give a sh1t here. |  |
| |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:11 - Mar 7 with 2218 views | BrixtonBlue |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:07 - Mar 7 by ZedRodgers |
I don't really see much of an issue here. The whole process has been revamped, strengthened and separated from any other decision-making team since Formby took over.
All this leaded email suggests is that the leadership team asked be kept in the loop with an overview of anything that relates to elected MPs, councillors or candidates. What's the problem with that exactly? They weren't stepping in or making decisions as some people are making out.
Would it not have been worse if an email leak suggested the leadership team had said they don't want to be told about cases relating to elected members? The same people who praised Tom Watson for personally stepping in to present a number of cases to the leadership are now saying the leadership being made aware of cases is wrong.
Seeing people who for so long have condemned the leadership for 'turning a blind eye' or 'not doing anything' now accuse them of having too much involvement seems a touch hypocritical. Regardless, an email leak that suggests something was the way it was before it changed isn't much of a scoop. The leadership team asking to be copied into emails in the interim before a new General Secretary came in and completely reshaped things seems an odd thing to focus on to me. |
Indeed, seems to be a total non-story to me. More attempted muck-spreading. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:11 - Mar 7 with 2217 views | Lord_Lucan |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:07 - Mar 7 by ZedRodgers |
I don't really see much of an issue here. The whole process has been revamped, strengthened and separated from any other decision-making team since Formby took over.
All this leaded email suggests is that the leadership team asked be kept in the loop with an overview of anything that relates to elected MPs, councillors or candidates. What's the problem with that exactly? They weren't stepping in or making decisions as some people are making out.
Would it not have been worse if an email leak suggested the leadership team had said they don't want to be told about cases relating to elected members? The same people who praised Tom Watson for personally stepping in to present a number of cases to the leadership are now saying the leadership being made aware of cases is wrong.
Seeing people who for so long have condemned the leadership for 'turning a blind eye' or 'not doing anything' now accuse them of having too much involvement seems a touch hypocritical. Regardless, an email leak that suggests something was the way it was before it changed isn't much of a scoop. The leadership team asking to be copied into emails in the interim before a new General Secretary came in and completely reshaped things seems an odd thing to focus on to me. |
Are you coming for lunch on Sunday Zed? |  |
| |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:11 - Mar 7 with 2216 views | BrixtonBlue |
| Oh Jeremy... on 20:11 - Mar 6 by jas0999 |
How anyone can support this man is beyond me. |
Did you even read the story? | |
| |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:12 - Mar 7 with 2215 views | itfcjoe |
|  |
| |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:14 - Mar 7 with 2211 views | Coastalblue |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:07 - Mar 7 by ZedRodgers |
I don't really see much of an issue here. The whole process has been revamped, strengthened and separated from any other decision-making team since Formby took over.
All this leaded email suggests is that the leadership team asked be kept in the loop with an overview of anything that relates to elected MPs, councillors or candidates. What's the problem with that exactly? They weren't stepping in or making decisions as some people are making out.
Would it not have been worse if an email leak suggested the leadership team had said they don't want to be told about cases relating to elected members? The same people who praised Tom Watson for personally stepping in to present a number of cases to the leadership are now saying the leadership being made aware of cases is wrong.
Seeing people who for so long have condemned the leadership for 'turning a blind eye' or 'not doing anything' now accuse them of having too much involvement seems a touch hypocritical. Regardless, an email leak that suggests something was the way it was before it changed isn't much of a scoop. The leadership team asking to be copied into emails in the interim before a new General Secretary came in and completely reshaped things seems an odd thing to focus on to me. |
The issue is that we have two main political parties who most of the electorate percieve as dishonest and self serving.
Sadly it appears that most of the electorate would be correct in their assumptions. |  |
| |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:19 - Mar 7 with 2194 views | lowhouseblue |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:12 - Mar 7 by itfcjoe |
|
now we just need zed to confirm that this is fine and problem free. | |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:22 - Mar 7 with 2185 views | itfcjoe |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:19 - Mar 7 by lowhouseblue |
now we just need zed to confirm that this is fine and problem free. |
This was one of the images spoken about in there
 | |
| |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:33 - Mar 7 with 2158 views | ZedRodgers |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:11 - Mar 7 by Lord_Lucan |
Are you coming for lunch on Sunday Zed? |
Hopefully but it's still touch and go whether I'll be in Ipswich. I might be in Diss on Sat/Sun instead, but if I am around I'll definitely come over at some point.
Maybe it's best not to worry about Zed food because of my commitment issues. The last thing I would want to do is let you down and damage the special relationship between the Rodgers and Lucan families. | |
| |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:40 - Mar 7 with 2141 views | ZedRodgers |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:09 - Mar 7 by Steve_M |
Last week, the leadership team said they didn't intervene in complaints Zed. Another lie, more evidence that they don't give a sh1t here. |
Who has intervened? | |
| |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:42 - Mar 7 with 2133 views | Lord_Lucan |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:33 - Mar 7 by ZedRodgers |
Hopefully but it's still touch and go whether I'll be in Ipswich. I might be in Diss on Sat/Sun instead, but if I am around I'll definitely come over at some point.
Maybe it's best not to worry about Zed food because of my commitment issues. The last thing I would want to do is let you down and damage the special relationship between the Rodgers and Lucan families. |
It's not a problem, I have Zed based plant food ready and waiting.
No pressure, just let me know how you're fixed on the day.
Can you eat wafer thin ham? | |
| |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:45 - Mar 7 with 2123 views | Steve_M |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:14 - Mar 7 by Coastalblue |
The issue is that we have two main political parties who most of the electorate percieve as dishonest and self serving.
Sadly it appears that most of the electorate would be correct in their assumptions. |
It's worse than that: Corrupt, self-serving, institutionally racist and lead by vindictive incompetents. | |
| |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:51 - Mar 7 with 2100 views | StokieBlue |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:11 - Mar 7 by BrixtonBlue |
Indeed, seems to be a total non-story to me. More attempted muck-spreading. |
It's not muck-spreading though. I don't see any problem with them wanting to be copied on complaints in a non-formal role but it's a fact they outright lied about it.
SB |  |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:54 - Mar 7 with 2094 views | lowhouseblue |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:22 - Mar 7 by itfcjoe |
This was one of the images spoken about in there
|
and you have to see that image along side the words from corbyn's office:
"there is clearly room for significant misinterpretation, as for example the alien image … there does not appear to be use of generalised use of anti-semitic imagery …"
so the leaders office wants a discipline out come based on there being 'misinterpretation' and no generalised use of anti-semitic imagery'.
and then you look back at the image.
these people are scum. | |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
| Oh Jeremy... on 11:00 - Mar 7 with 2063 views | StokieBlue |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:54 - Mar 7 by lowhouseblue |
and you have to see that image along side the words from corbyn's office:
"there is clearly room for significant misinterpretation, as for example the alien image … there does not appear to be use of generalised use of anti-semitic imagery …"
so the leaders office wants a discipline out come based on there being 'misinterpretation' and no generalised use of anti-semitic imagery'.
and then you look back at the image.
these people are scum. |
It’s a facehugger from the Alien films. It’s entire purpose is to plant a parasite within the host and use them for its own purposes.
I think the usage, background and image itself are pretty clear.
SB | |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
| Oh Jeremy... on 11:01 - Mar 7 with 2060 views | ZedRodgers |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:19 - Mar 7 by lowhouseblue |
now we just need zed to confirm that this is fine and problem free. |
Confirm what?
The debate seems to have now moved from saying Corbyn is intervening in antisemitism cases to saying the head of compliance and complaints of antisemitism shouldn't have intervened in a complaint of antisemitism. The question should really be whether or not he made the right decision.
Personally, I think in this instance they should have suspended first before fully investigating the member instead of issuing a conduct warning and suspending later. Of course there is the argument that education on why sharing images like this is unhelpful would have more of an impact on solving the problem than outright exclusion and expulsion. | |
| |
| Oh Jeremy... on 11:07 - Mar 7 with 2038 views | ZedRodgers |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:51 - Mar 7 by StokieBlue |
It's not muck-spreading though. I don't see any problem with them wanting to be copied on complaints in a non-formal role but it's a fact they outright lied about it.
SB |
What have they lied about though?
Nothing here suggests the leadership team have any involvement in the decision-making process. Being given an overview or the results and decisions made seems perfectly normal behaviour to me.
Nobody outside the Governance and Legal team have been involved in process of any claims since Formby took over in 2018. So who has lied about what exactly? | |
| |
| Oh Jeremy... on 11:10 - Mar 7 with 2030 views | ZedRodgers |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:54 - Mar 7 by lowhouseblue |
and you have to see that image along side the words from corbyn's office:
"there is clearly room for significant misinterpretation, as for example the alien image … there does not appear to be use of generalised use of anti-semitic imagery …"
so the leaders office wants a discipline out come based on there being 'misinterpretation' and no generalised use of anti-semitic imagery'.
and then you look back at the image.
these people are scum. |
You are either misconceived or are deliberately misleading people by saying the email is from 'Corbyn's office'. [Post edited 7 Mar 2019 12:10]
| |
| |
| Oh Jeremy... on 11:19 - Mar 7 with 2007 views | ZedRodgers |
| Oh Jeremy... on 10:42 - Mar 7 by Lord_Lucan |
It's not a problem, I have Zed based plant food ready and waiting.
No pressure, just let me know how you're fixed on the day.
Can you eat wafer thin ham? |
Okay will do.
Zed can have some Dairylea can't he Barbara. Oooh it's such a shame for him. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
