So Webster’s money 07:07 - Jul 17 with 1582 views | cobbler | Am I right his fee was 3.5 mil up front and PH has that to reinvest in the team and that we already paid £700.000 for Edwards? So if I am correct then we have 2.8 mil to still reinvest where are we likely to do that in what positions we all know we need at least 1 centre half and maybe a striker. But with three weeks to go I think Hurst needs to get a move on getting some deals done if we are to get a settled start to the season. | | | | |
So Webster’s money on 07:09 - Jul 17 with 1574 views | homer_123 | We won't be spending 2.8m on transfer fees. | |
| |
So Webster’s money on 07:19 - Jul 17 with 1534 views | Benters2 | It will go on Barts wages innit. | | | |
So Webster’s money on 07:21 - Jul 17 with 1523 views | homer_123 |
So Webster’s money on 07:19 - Jul 17 by Benters2 | It will go on Barts wages innit. |
Conservatively Barts wages will be around 750k to 1m a year. | |
| |
So Webster’s money on 07:23 - Jul 17 with 1511 views | Benters2 |
So Webster’s money on 07:21 - Jul 17 by homer_123 | Conservatively Barts wages will be around 750k to 1m a year. |
Good luck to Bart,im glad he stayed. | | | |
So Webster’s money on 07:53 - Jul 17 with 1444 views | PhilTWTD |
So Webster’s money on 07:09 - Jul 17 by homer_123 | We won't be spending 2.8m on transfer fees. |
Indeed, wages come into it as well and there's £550,000 to take out of that which went to Portsmouth as their sell-on. | | | |
So Webster’s money on 07:59 - Jul 17 with 1417 views | Bluebell | We have also gained the wages of McGoldrick, Hyam, Bru and Crowe (and anyone else who was told to leave that I can't remember). I doubt Hyam, Bru and Crowe were on a lot compared to some but we know McGoldrick was. | | | |
So Webster’s money on 08:37 - Jul 17 with 1360 views | ElderGrizzly |
So Webster’s money on 07:59 - Jul 17 by Bluebell | We have also gained the wages of McGoldrick, Hyam, Bru and Crowe (and anyone else who was told to leave that I can't remember). I doubt Hyam, Bru and Crowe were on a lot compared to some but we know McGoldrick was. |
I suggest some of McG’s wages will pay for the upcoming new contract for Waghorn | | | |
So Webster’s money on 08:39 - Jul 17 with 1356 views | Herbivore | Hurst would love to have some more players in, but he's not the one doing the deals. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
So Webster’s money on 08:40 - Jul 17 with 1357 views | Trequartista | We won't be using the Webster money. We paid £1.5m for players last season so until that has gone, we're still on the normal budget. But watch people try and tell you it's the Webster money re-invested. [Post edited 17 Jul 2018 8:41]
| |
| |
So Webster’s money on 08:52 - Jul 17 with 1304 views | Reuser_is_God |
So Webster’s money on 07:53 - Jul 17 by PhilTWTD | Indeed, wages come into it as well and there's £550,000 to take out of that which went to Portsmouth as their sell-on. |
Although that’s been covered by the money we received from FIFA | |
| |
So Webster’s money on 09:04 - Jul 17 with 1262 views | dirtyboy | I think Hurst will be fairly patient on some aspects, leaving himself a little bit of "wiggle room" come January. I think maybe one more signing (assuming Edwards comes in) and that'll be our central defender. We may have a bit more left in the pot which if things aren't great after Christmas, will give him a chance to make some changes he feels are needed. We'll see though. | | | |
| |