Webster fee 17:34 - Jun 27 with 1123 views | Wickets | Phil have Portsmouth got a sell on clause ? | | | | |
Webster fee on 17:36 - Jun 27 with 1125 views | PhilTWTD | Yes, as it says in the story! 20 per cent of profit on the fee we paid which was £700,000 plus Matt Clarke, so probably about a million, but not been able to get the valuation on Clarke confirmed. | | | |
Webster fee on 17:52 - Jun 27 with 1063 views | bournemouthblue |
Webster fee on 17:36 - Jun 27 by PhilTWTD | Yes, as it says in the story! 20 per cent of profit on the fee we paid which was £700,000 plus Matt Clarke, so probably about a million, but not been able to get the valuation on Clarke confirmed. |
Making the transfer fee for us even poorer in the end Bad times I'm sure Hurst has a replacement but I suspect the ceiling is far lower for that player sadly I know his injury record isn't the best but he has the potential to be another Stones or Maguire | |
| |
Webster fee on 17:53 - Jun 27 with 1056 views | DanTheMan |
Webster fee on 17:36 - Jun 27 by PhilTWTD | Yes, as it says in the story! 20 per cent of profit on the fee we paid which was £700,000 plus Matt Clarke, so probably about a million, but not been able to get the valuation on Clarke confirmed. |
Is it likely we will too? | |
| |
Webster fee on 17:56 - Jun 27 with 1052 views | strikalite | Did we get a sell on for Matt Clarke? | | | |
Webster fee on 18:09 - Jun 27 with 1015 views | PhilTWTD |
Webster fee on 17:56 - Jun 27 by strikalite | Did we get a sell on for Matt Clarke? |
I believe so. | | | |
Webster fee on 18:09 - Jun 27 with 1013 views | PhilTWTD |
Webster fee on 17:53 - Jun 27 by DanTheMan | Is it likely we will too? |
Town almost always include them in deals, so I can't see there not being one. | | | |
| |