| No big fee for Johnson - Watson in EADT just now 13:41 - Jan 18 with 2319 views | Illinoisblue |
A source has told the EADT and Ipswich Star that while Johnson is a player of interest to Kieran McKenna, no formal bid has yet been lodged and the club would not be prepared to pay any more than a nominal fee for a player who recently turned 33 |  |
| |  |
| No big fee for Johnson - Watson in EADT just now on 13:45 - Jan 18 with 2181 views | _clive_baker_ |
There's no way we'll pay £1m for a 33 year old. It's entirely contrary to our transfer policy of investing fees in players with potential sell on value.
He would be a good player to pick up, good experience and in form. Primarily as cover for Davis or a replacement for Davis in the latter stages of games which is a definite area we're short. There isn't a chance we would spend that sort of money on him though. |  | | |
| No big fee for Johnson - Watson in EADT just now on 13:45 - Jan 18 with 2169 views | DarkBrandon |
Pfft. Lack of ambition again. Etc etc |  | | |
| No big fee for Johnson - Watson in EADT just now on 13:51 - Jan 18 with 2040 views | burnbudgiesburn |
Whilst £1m is ridiculous, there's no way Wednesday let a player who is instrumental in their seasons upturn leave for a 'nominal' fee.
Unless i'm an old git and still live in the 80's and 250k is now nominal |  | | |
| No big fee for Johnson - Watson in EADT just now on 13:52 - Jan 18 with 1985 views | tractorboy1978 |
| No big fee for Johnson - Watson in EADT just now on 13:51 - Jan 18 by burnbudgiesburn |
Whilst £1m is ridiculous, there's no way Wednesday let a player who is instrumental in their seasons upturn leave for a 'nominal' fee.
Unless i'm an old git and still live in the 80's and 250k is now nominal |
Assume he's probably a decent earner there though and out of contract in 6 months. So a £200k fee and wages off the books to use elsewhere might be useful. | | | |
| No big fee for Johnson - Watson in EADT just now on 14:04 - Jan 18 with 1790 views | _clive_baker_ |
| No big fee for Johnson - Watson in EADT just now on 13:51 - Jan 18 by burnbudgiesburn |
Whilst £1m is ridiculous, there's no way Wednesday let a player who is instrumental in their seasons upturn leave for a 'nominal' fee.
Unless i'm an old git and still live in the 80's and 250k is now nominal |
I think 250k probably is considered nominal in this day and age for a player with a lot of Championship appearances under his belt. Over a 2 year contract it's no different to signing a free transfer who commands 2.5k more in wages per week. Beating Maidstone would pay for half of that in prize money.
From their perspective they might think it's better to cash in now than him walk on a free in the summer. Although given their league position I would certainly be looking to keep hold of him for the run in. | | | |
| No big fee for Johnson - Watson in EADT just now on 14:05 - Jan 18 with 1780 views | burnbudgiesburn |
| No big fee for Johnson - Watson in EADT just now on 13:52 - Jan 18 by tractorboy1978 |
Assume he's probably a decent earner there though and out of contract in 6 months. So a £200k fee and wages off the books to use elsewhere might be useful. |
Wednesday fans saying he signed a 1yr extension so its 18 months | | | |
| No big fee for Johnson - Watson in EADT just now on 14:35 - Jan 18 with 1431 views | ITFC_Forever |
A nominal fee would be ok - and we'd get that back from Brandon's wages we wouldn't then be paying anyway (assuming he goes back... if not, we don't need Johnson).
There's no way on this earth we'd pay £1m+ for a 33 year old to be a back up. |  |
| |
| No big fee for Johnson - Watson in EADT just now on 14:37 - Jan 18 with 1398 views | hype313 |
Source being Andy Warren |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| No big fee for Johnson - Watson in EADT just now on 15:18 - Jan 18 with 1089 views | BlueandTruesince82 |
| No big fee for Johnson - Watson in EADT just now on 13:51 - Jan 18 by burnbudgiesburn |
Whilst £1m is ridiculous, there's no way Wednesday let a player who is instrumental in their seasons upturn leave for a 'nominal' fee.
Unless i'm an old git and still live in the 80's and 250k is now nominal |
Their owner will probably sell just top pi55 their fans off |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
