| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first 11:08 - Jan 14 with 2242 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
half. So unlucky with that chance Jackson almost slid onto, and one or two others. Love seeing him in full flight. |  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |  |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 11:09 - Jan 14 with 1942 views | FrimleyBlue |
A good cross Jackson almost got on the end of. |  |
| |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 11:17 - Jan 14 with 1915 views | StochesStotasBlewe |
Agree, managed to get a few good crosses and gave their full back a hard time first half. Defended well too. |  |
| We have no village green, or a shop.
It's very, very quiet.
I can walk to the pub. |
| |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 11:20 - Jan 14 with 1889 views | StochesStotasBlewe |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 11:09 - Jan 14 by FrimleyBlue |
A good cross Jackson almost got on the end of. |
Exciting to watch though wasn’t it and had us out of our seats on quite a few occasions. | |
| We have no village green, or a shop.
It's very, very quiet.
I can walk to the pub. |
| |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 11:23 - Jan 14 with 1862 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 11:20 - Jan 14 by StochesStotasBlewe |
Exciting to watch though wasn’t it and had us out of our seats on quite a few occasions. |
It was a great ball into space for him to run onto yes. | |
| |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 11:26 - Jan 14 with 1849 views | Herbivore |
He was brilliant first half. Had the full back on toast at times and produced some good deliveries that we couldn't quite convert. |  |
| |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 11:53 - Jan 14 with 1780 views | blueislander |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 11:23 - Jan 14 by FrimleyBlue |
It was a great ball into space for him to run onto yes. |
Go on Frimmers. I dare you to say that Burns had a good game, especially in the first half. |  | | |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 12:10 - Jan 14 with 1731 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 11:53 - Jan 14 by blueislander |
Go on Frimmers. I dare you to say that Burns had a good game, especially in the first half. |
I don't think he did. There was others that shared that thought yesterday. But this is a thread to be positive about him so I'll leave you to it. | |
| |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 12:56 - Jan 14 with 1665 views | billlm |
Was good, he went to make some very intelligent runs behind his full back but wasn't picked which was a shame for him, he was on it last night, |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 13:37 - Jan 14 with 1569 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 12:10 - Jan 14 by FrimleyBlue |
I don't think he did. There was others that shared that thought yesterday. But this is a thread to be positive about him so I'll leave you to it. |
This thread was a trap and you were the quarry. Well done for diving straight in. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 13:40 - Jan 14 with 1550 views | MK1 |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 13:37 - Jan 14 by The_Flashing_Smile |
This thread was a trap and you were the quarry. Well done for diving straight in. |
Give the lad a break. |  | | |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 13:40 - Jan 14 with 1550 views | Vegtablue |
Oops meant to 👍 | | | |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 13:44 - Jan 14 with 1527 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 13:37 - Jan 14 by The_Flashing_Smile |
This thread was a trap and you were the quarry. Well done for diving straight in. |
I feel I've been respectful of your thread.
I don't believe the owners of the site however will be amused by your admission however. | |
| |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 13:49 - Jan 14 with 1510 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 13:37 - Jan 14 by The_Flashing_Smile |
This thread was a trap and you were the quarry. Well done for diving straight in. |
Abuse? | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 13:50 - Jan 14 with 1508 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 13:40 - Jan 14 by MK1 |
Give the lad a break. |
Chill out luv, it's only bantz. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 13:50 - Jan 14 with 1494 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 13:44 - Jan 14 by FrimleyBlue |
I feel I've been respectful of your thread.
I don't believe the owners of the site however will be amused by your admission however. |
I'd hope everyone would be amused, including yourself. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 13:51 - Jan 14 with 1488 views | MK1 |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 13:44 - Jan 14 by FrimleyBlue |
I feel I've been respectful of your thread.
I don't believe the owners of the site however will be amused by your admission however. |
I've taken you off ignore, because I see how some on here treat you. Yes, you don't help yourself sometimes, but this thread was solely about getting you involved. I massively disagree with this type of behaviour. Try not to respond to it. | | | |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 15:10 - Jan 14 with 1355 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 13:51 - Jan 14 by MK1 |
I've taken you off ignore, because I see how some on here treat you. Yes, you don't help yourself sometimes, but this thread was solely about getting you involved. I massively disagree with this type of behaviour. Try not to respond to it. |
It's just a little odd
If I replied and stated my thoughts on Burns. He'd had been the first to have a go anyway so I don't really get the point in it.
Good to know he feels its ok troll though. Good to know. | |
| |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 15:18 - Jan 14 with 1322 views | NeedhamChris |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 13:37 - Jan 14 by The_Flashing_Smile |
This thread was a trap and you were the quarry. Well done for diving straight in. |
@phil - can you have a word? This is openly baiting another poster and it's beyond tedious.
Frimleys views are questionable (as all of ours are at times), but that's less sad than following him around trying to 'educate' him.
They either need an enforced ignore or something else, but this behaviour is just a bit sad. | |
| |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 15:20 - Jan 14 with 1305 views | NeedhamChris |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 13:51 - Jan 14 by MK1 |
I've taken you off ignore, because I see how some on here treat you. Yes, you don't help yourself sometimes, but this thread was solely about getting you involved. I massively disagree with this type of behaviour. Try not to respond to it. |
100%. | |
| |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 16:05 - Jan 14 with 1204 views | blueasfook |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 15:18 - Jan 14 by NeedhamChris |
@phil - can you have a word? This is openly baiting another poster and it's beyond tedious.
Frimleys views are questionable (as all of ours are at times), but that's less sad than following him around trying to 'educate' him.
They either need an enforced ignore or something else, but this behaviour is just a bit sad. |
Here here!
*waves papers*
Poor Frimmers can't post owt without getting jumped on. Leave the guy alone. |  |
| |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 16:24 - Jan 14 with 1101 views | pointofblue |
He was great in the first half. I thought he was quieter in the second because more of our attacks went down the left, at least until Hutchinson came on where it became more equal again. | |
| |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 16:25 - Jan 14 with 1103 views | Vic |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 13:37 - Jan 14 by The_Flashing_Smile |
This thread was a trap and you were the quarry. Well done for diving straight in. |
Really no need to bait people is there - not really in the spirit of this place. |  |
| |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 16:26 - Jan 14 with 1090 views | Vic |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 13:51 - Jan 14 by MK1 |
I've taken you off ignore, because I see how some on here treat you. Yes, you don't help yourself sometimes, but this thread was solely about getting you involved. I massively disagree with this type of behaviour. Try not to respond to it. |
I cant take him off 'ignore' but I'm disappointed with this deliberate baiting. | |
| |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 17:50 - Jan 14 with 973 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 13:51 - Jan 14 by MK1 |
I've taken you off ignore, because I see how some on here treat you. Yes, you don't help yourself sometimes, but this thread was solely about getting you involved. I massively disagree with this type of behaviour. Try not to respond to it. |
It wasn't solely about getting Frimmers involved, that was a joke. The OP was my genuine feelings about Burns, Frimmers was not called out in the post and was not remotely obliged to reply.
How on earth you come to the conclusion that my OP was some "type of behaviour" designed to treat another poster in a certain way is beyond me. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 17:52 - Jan 14 with 967 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Not seen it mentioned, but I thought Burns was a real threat, especially first on 15:10 - Jan 14 by FrimleyBlue |
It's just a little odd
If I replied and stated my thoughts on Burns. He'd had been the first to have a go anyway so I don't really get the point in it.
Good to know he feels its ok troll though. Good to know. |
Would be great for you to explain how my OP is trolling. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
