| Our substitutions 21:13 - Feb 11 with 557 views | RegencyBlue |
Not for the first time I thought our substitutions disrupted us rather than improved us. We were building up a head of steam before the changes began but this then fizzled out .
I like McKenna and I think he will turn out to be a very good manager but my problem with him is that substitutions, which appear to be decided on before the game begins, judging by the regular timing of them pretty much every game, seem to be made regardless of what is happening on the pitch.
For me we were playing our best football of the match when the subs started so why change it? |  | | |  |
| Our substitutions on 21:16 - Feb 11 with 532 views | homer_123 |
Broady and Hirst had run themselves into the ground and Burns isn't 100% fit, so the changes were sensible today.
Not withstanding that we were in the ascendency. |  |
| |
| Our substitutions on 21:21 - Feb 11 with 497 views | Fixed_It |
| Our substitutions on 21:16 - Feb 11 by homer_123 |
Broady and Hirst had run themselves into the ground and Burns isn't 100% fit, so the changes were sensible today.
Not withstanding that we were in the ascendency. |
Exactly. They were knackered, so unlikely to be able to continue with that level of intensity. |  |
| |
| Were you at the same game? on 21:29 - Feb 11 with 481 views | unstableblue |
Chaplin was ineffective and Hirst was flagging
Broadhead was down with cramp and Burns looked injured |  |
| |
| Were you at the same game? on 22:02 - Feb 11 with 433 views | Plums |
| Were you at the same game? on 21:29 - Feb 11 by unstableblue |
Chaplin was ineffective and Hirst was flagging
Broadhead was down with cramp and Burns looked injured |
I though Burns looked as though he was limping slightly when he came out for the second half. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
