When are the club issuing their rebuttal to that article? 17:50 - Aug 9 with 870 views | Mullet | Given the gutting news about Lankester it’s be better late than never. It opens the door for El Mizouni I guess, but I was looking forward to seeing Jack kick on. | |
| | |
When are the club issuing their rebuttal to that article? on 18:00 - Aug 9 with 819 views | PhilTWTD | There are issues surrounding it which mean they're unable to release it, legal stuff, safeguarding stuff. Suffice it to say, the club is very frustrated and angry, feeling the situation was not represented fairly, not least as the PFA review, to quote their statement, “found no substantiation to such allegations to warrant any action." | | | |
When are the club issuing their rebuttal to that article? on 18:03 - Aug 9 with 802 views | Mullet |
When are the club issuing their rebuttal to that article? on 18:00 - Aug 9 by PhilTWTD | There are issues surrounding it which mean they're unable to release it, legal stuff, safeguarding stuff. Suffice it to say, the club is very frustrated and angry, feeling the situation was not represented fairly, not least as the PFA review, to quote their statement, “found no substantiation to such allegations to warrant any action." |
Cheers Phil. Seems serious that they can’t issue something with anonymity remaining if they are holding off on legal advice. | |
| |
When are the club issuing their rebuttal to that article? on 18:46 - Aug 9 with 705 views | Marshalls_Mullet | Only just seen the news re Lankester. Gutted! I think he would have been an absolute star this season! | |
| |
When are the club issuing their rebuttal to that article? on 18:51 - Aug 9 with 690 views | PhilTWTD |
When are the club issuing their rebuttal to that article? on 18:03 - Aug 9 by Mullet | Cheers Phil. Seems serious that they can’t issue something with anonymity remaining if they are holding off on legal advice. |
More complicated than serious. | | | |
| |