4-4-2, 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 17:56 - Jul 17 with 3966 views | tractorboy1978 | How do you think Mick will predominantly line us up? | | | | |
4-4-2, 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 on 18:01 - Jul 17 with 3957 views | Dennyx4 | Think Mick wants to go 442. Think I would prefer 4231 though. | | | |
4-4-2, 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 on 18:03 - Jul 17 with 3951 views | fergalsharkey | Defensive bias and if we happen to score early shore it up even more by taking off a striker and replacing with defender who will go spare and displaying a sign in our half saying please attack we are clueless. | |
| |
4-4-2, 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 on 18:05 - Jul 17 with 3944 views | tractorboy1978 |
4-4-2, 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 on 18:01 - Jul 17 by Dennyx4 | Think Mick wants to go 442. Think I would prefer 4231 though. |
Assuming you want balance then you'd think Smith will play as a left sided centre half but I can't see Chambers and Webster not playing if fit which makes me lean towards 3 centre halves. I also think as it stands we have decent balance with a midfield 3 of Skuse, Adeyemi and Huws. But then Celina will play and Garner has always been better with a partner up top. | | | |
4-4-2, 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 on 18:13 - Jul 17 with 3924 views | SWGF | Ask Mike | |
| |
on 18:32 - Jul 17 with 3879 views | _ | | | | |
4-4-2, 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 on 18:39 - Jul 17 with 3855 views | blueislander |
Wash your mouth out! It is blasphemy to suggest that Skuse will not play. | | | |
on 18:42 - Jul 17 with 3843 views | _ |
4-4-2, 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 on 18:39 - Jul 17 by blueislander | Wash your mouth out! It is blasphemy to suggest that Skuse will not play. |
| | | |
4-4-2, 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 on 18:48 - Jul 17 with 3831 views | BLUEBEAT |
So it will really be 4-5-1 | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
on 18:50 - Jul 17 with 3824 views | _ |
4-4-2, 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 on 18:48 - Jul 17 by BLUEBEAT | So it will really be 4-5-1 |
| | | |
4-4-2, 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 on 18:50 - Jul 17 with 3826 views | RonFearonsHair | Match the opposition. Strangle their game. Nick something if we can. | | | |
4-4-2, 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 on 18:51 - Jul 17 with 3817 views | christiand |
Skuse and Chambers will be 1 and 2 on MM's team sheet. | |
| |
4-4-2, 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 on 18:52 - Jul 17 with 3814 views | blueislander |
I think he is a dreadful footballer, but , I bet he will be first choice. | | | |
4-4-2, 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 on 18:53 - Jul 17 with 3806 views | blueislander |
4-4-2, 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 on 18:51 - Jul 17 by christiand | Skuse and Chambers will be 1 and 2 on MM's team sheet. |
Sad innit? | | | |
on 18:54 - Jul 17 with 3801 views | _ |
4-4-2, 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 on 18:51 - Jul 17 by christiand | Skuse and Chambers will be 1 and 2 on MM's team sheet. |
| | | |
on 18:55 - Jul 17 with 3795 views | _ |
4-4-2, 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 on 18:52 - Jul 17 by blueislander | I think he is a dreadful footballer, but , I bet he will be first choice. |
| | | |
4-4-2, 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 on 19:02 - Jul 17 with 3775 views | christiand |
Just don't see MM not having a defensive midfielder shielding the defence. A midfield 3 does make sense, but then this impacts on the selection of other players e.g Celina or Rowe. Agree Chambers has to start, we look a little inexperienced defensively if he doesn't. Just feel sure Skuse will be another starter too - they are both MM favourites, the rest of the team selections will be made around them. [Post edited 17 Jul 2017 19:04]
| |
| |
4-4-2, 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 on 19:29 - Jul 17 with 3734 views | Swansea_Blue | I'd go with a diamond, Scuse deep. We've got the midfielders to do it now and the full backs to create the width. And we need 2 up top, with Sears buzzing off Garner. Bart Spence Chambo Webster Noddy Scuse Ward Huws Sick note Freddie Garner But, McG and Sears would need to drop deeper when we're not in possession. Alternatively we go 451 with Freedy out wide. But when we have the ball he's got freedom to join Garner to make effectively a 442. No room for McG there though. | |
| |
4-4-2, 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 on 19:46 - Jul 17 with 3711 views | Nazemariner | I get the impression Mick wants to play 4-4-2. But I don't see how he can shoehorn Chambo into that system. I would favour a 5-2-1-2 as we don't have a great deal of width other than at full back, and I think it would get the best out of Webster. That said, 5 at the back looked dreadful last season. | | | |
4-4-2, 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 on 20:02 - Jul 17 with 3682 views | OsborneOneNil |
Let's hope so! | | | |
4-4-2, 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 on 20:05 - Jul 17 with 3663 views | jaykay | as long as we dont play 2 holding midfield players at home ,i dont mind any formation | |
| forensic experts say footers and spruces fingerprints were not found at the scene after the weekends rows |
| |
| |