| Stonewall (n/t) 14:07 - Jan 27 with 2761 views | GlasgowBlue |
|  |
| |  |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:07 - Jan 27 with 2346 views | Herbivore |
Supposedly a Premier League ref as well. He's been sh!te. |  |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:08 - Jan 27 with 2334 views | Swansea_Blue |
No chance. It’s not a yellow though. |  |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:11 - Jan 27 with 2255 views | Jimmy86 |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:07 - Jan 27 by Herbivore |
Supposedly a Premier League ref as well. He's been sh!te. |
And a FIFA select referee on top of that! I mean, I thought it was a pen.. but to give it the other way and book him was ridiculous! |  | | |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:11 - Jan 27 with 2252 views | Kentish_Tractor |
Not stonewall but its a penalty. He slid in and Fridge got there first. | |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:15 - Jan 27 with 2188 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:07 - Jan 27 by Herbivore |
Supposedly a Premier League ref as well. He's been sh!te. |
Isn’t there VAR in the FA Cup? | |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:44 - Jan 27 with 2072 views | matteoblue |
Did he make contact? |  |
| We are Premier League, say we are Premier League! |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:44 - Jan 27 with 2064 views | Herbivore |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:44 - Jan 27 by matteoblue |
Did he make contact? |
Yes. | |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:44 - Jan 27 with 2045 views | pointofblue |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:15 - Jan 27 by GlasgowBlue |
Isn’t there VAR in the FA Cup? |
Only at Premier League grounds. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:45 - Jan 27 with 2032 views | JammyDodgerrr |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:15 - Jan 27 by GlasgowBlue |
Isn’t there VAR in the FA Cup? |
Only at prem grounds.
I know why the pen wasn't given, but the shirt pull on Sarmiento that lead to the goal is inexcusable. |  |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:48 - Jan 27 with 1983 views | Stewart27 |
That ref completely bought into the romance today. He was awful.
However, I’m more embarrassed about the fact I’m moaning about the ref. | | | |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:49 - Jan 27 with 1955 views | RadioOrwell |
Important moment in Gay civil rights. Respect to you for thinking about that during a Cup tie. |  | | |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:55 - Jan 27 with 1913 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:44 - Jan 27 by pointofblue |
Only at Premier League grounds. |
Surely that compromises the competition? The rules should be the same for all teams. At least when we enter the third round stage. | |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 15:43 - Jan 27 with 1742 views | bluejacko |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:55 - Jan 27 by GlasgowBlue |
Surely that compromises the competition? The rules should be the same for all teams. At least when we enter the third round stage. |
Yep nonsense isn’t it? Premier teams can get all the dodgy calls reviewed while the rest of us have to lump it! | | | |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 15:46 - Jan 27 with 1714 views | pointofblue |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:55 - Jan 27 by GlasgowBlue |
Surely that compromises the competition? The rules should be the same for all teams. At least when we enter the third round stage. |
It's even worse when you consider, for example, West Ham v Bristol City - had VAR in the first game but not the replay. Bristol City v Forest yesterday didn't have VAR but will for the replay. It's the same tie but the rules change.
Saying that, I'm not 100% sure whether VAR would have given a penalty to us. I do think it would have overturned Maidstone's second goal, though. | |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 15:49 - Jan 27 with 1657 views | gainsboroughblue |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 15:46 - Jan 27 by pointofblue |
It's even worse when you consider, for example, West Ham v Bristol City - had VAR in the first game but not the replay. Bristol City v Forest yesterday didn't have VAR but will for the replay. It's the same tie but the rules change.
Saying that, I'm not 100% sure whether VAR would have given a penalty to us. I do think it would have overturned Maidstone's second goal, though. |
I can accept that the penalty wasn't given as I don't want to go down the road of blaming officials for us failing to deal with a team in the sixth tier over 90 minutes at home.
But the yellow card was a ridiculous decision. The thing that surprised me was how submissive we were over it. Not a hint of protest. |  |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 15:50 - Jan 27 with 1629 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 15:46 - Jan 27 by pointofblue |
It's even worse when you consider, for example, West Ham v Bristol City - had VAR in the first game but not the replay. Bristol City v Forest yesterday didn't have VAR but will for the replay. It's the same tie but the rules change.
Saying that, I'm not 100% sure whether VAR would have given a penalty to us. I do think it would have overturned Maidstone's second goal, though. |
The fact there was contact and he booked Edmundson for diving would mean he would have to have revisited it, surely? It wasn't a dive, the ref thought it was. He could look at it, decide it was a coming together and withdraw the yellow card but I think he would likely then give the penalty as well. |  |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 15:53 - Jan 27 with 1586 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 15:49 - Jan 27 by gainsboroughblue |
I can accept that the penalty wasn't given as I don't want to go down the road of blaming officials for us failing to deal with a team in the sixth tier over 90 minutes at home.
But the yellow card was a ridiculous decision. The thing that surprised me was how submissive we were over it. Not a hint of protest. |
It is pointless to get a yellow card for dissent as it won't change the decision. However, we did seem to lack passion. There is a middle ground where you show it was a ridiculous call but don't get yourself booked. Chaplin and Morsy did this a couple of times. | |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 16:03 - Jan 27 with 1525 views | Steve_M |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 15:53 - Jan 27 by Nthsuffolkblue |
It is pointless to get a yellow card for dissent as it won't change the decision. However, we did seem to lack passion. There is a middle ground where you show it was a ridiculous call but don't get yourself booked. Chaplin and Morsy did this a couple of times. |
He was booked for the alleged dive rather than dissent. |  |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 16:04 - Jan 27 with 1512 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 16:03 - Jan 27 by Steve_M |
He was booked for the alleged dive rather than dissent. |
I know. I was commenting on the lack of complaint from our players. | |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 16:05 - Jan 27 with 1492 views | TractorWood |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:48 - Jan 27 by Stewart27 |
That ref completely bought into the romance today. He was awful.
However, I’m more embarrassed about the fact I’m moaning about the ref. |
Yeh. Very tinpot to moan about the ref against a non league team when we are flying. |  |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 16:08 - Jan 27 with 1464 views | Herbivore |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 16:05 - Jan 27 by TractorWood |
Yeh. Very tinpot to moan about the ref against a non league team when we are flying. |
I mean, the ref should still do his job properly though, surely? He's made two big non decisions that have cost us a goal and denied us a penalty. If it had just been the other stuff of giving them free kicks for nothing challenges whilst allowing a lot of physical stuff from them then fair enough, but he made bad calls that had a big impact on the result. Of course we should still have had too much for them but that doesn't mean we should ignore the poor refereeing. | |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 16:10 - Jan 27 with 1442 views | TractorWood |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 16:08 - Jan 27 by Herbivore |
I mean, the ref should still do his job properly though, surely? He's made two big non decisions that have cost us a goal and denied us a penalty. If it had just been the other stuff of giving them free kicks for nothing challenges whilst allowing a lot of physical stuff from them then fair enough, but he made bad calls that had a big impact on the result. Of course we should still have had too much for them but that doesn't mean we should ignore the poor refereeing. |
See previous statement. The ref didn't stop Broadhead and Taylor turning up. [Post edited 27 Jan 16:10]
| |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 16:16 - Jan 27 with 1386 views | Herbivore |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 16:10 - Jan 27 by TractorWood |
See previous statement. The ref didn't stop Broadhead and Taylor turning up. [Post edited 27 Jan 16:10]
|
I give up. | |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 16:55 - Jan 27 with 1283 views | pointofblue |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 16:10 - Jan 27 by TractorWood |
See previous statement. The ref didn't stop Broadhead and Taylor turning up. [Post edited 27 Jan 16:10]
|
He didn't, but he still had an impact on the game which was biased towards Maidstone. | |
| |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 16:59 - Jan 27 with 1253 views | ChampionsofInnsbruck |
| Stonewall (n/t) on 14:55 - Jan 27 by GlasgowBlue |
Surely that compromises the competition? The rules should be the same for all teams. At least when we enter the third round stage. |
Do you think the FA care? They’re after Manchester City and an Arsenal level team getting to the finall, they literally don’t give two crud’s about EFL teams. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
