| I’ve now seen the TV pictures 18:41 - Dec 16 with 1224 views | bluefunk |
I didn’t think the first one was offside until I saw the playback, he was definitely offside. And as for the second one, how is the player right in from of Hladky and beyond the last defender not interfering - shocking officiating. |  | | |  |
| I’ve now seen the TV pictures on 18:47 - Dec 16 with 1161 views | SaleAway |
First one was off, second one made absolutely no difference. Hladky was deceived by the ricochet, but had a reasonable view.
At the end of the day though. If we'd taken our chances we wouldn't be talking about these decisions. |  |
| |
| I’ve now seen the TV pictures on 18:50 - Dec 16 with 1134 views | You_Bloo_Right |
Quite so Funkmaster.
There may have been an offside for our first too (but no doubt about the second). |  |
| |
| I’ve now seen the TV pictures on 20:54 - Dec 16 with 871 views | King_of_Portman_Rd |
| I’ve now seen the TV pictures on 18:50 - Dec 16 by You_Bloo_Right |
Quite so Funkmaster.
There may have been an offside for our first too (but no doubt about the second). |
Indeed. If that match was in the premier League, The only goal that wouldn’t had the intensive VAR scrutiny would have been Wes’
Seen similar goals to all the other 3 be chalked for one reason or another.
Most frustrating of their first was the high looping cross not being dealt with in the first place and Rowe having a relatively unchallenged attempt on two occasions. |  | | |
| I’ve now seen the TV pictures on 21:13 - Dec 16 with 777 views | rkc123 |
Did you not think Rowe was level with the ball as it was crossed in though? It was tight but it looked like he might have been. I was more frustrated Woolfenden just seemed to switch off and wandered past him, leaving him completely open when it came back in. | | | |
| I’ve now seen the TV pictures on 21:34 - Dec 16 with 690 views | bournemouthblue |
| I’ve now seen the TV pictures on 21:13 - Dec 16 by rkc123 |
Did you not think Rowe was level with the ball as it was crossed in though? It was tight but it looked like he might have been. I was more frustrated Woolfenden just seemed to switch off and wandered past him, leaving him completely open when it came back in. |
Not when he was on the ground, Sky showed a graphic where he was well ahead but there you go, both were missed
Norwich offered very little and got lucky, it will all be irrelevant if we get a result against Leeds and Leicester |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
