| Mo Salah 17:04 - Jan 2 with 1235 views | gtsb1966 |
Chelsea must regret that decision to get rid. He really is some player. When it comes to the best players ever to have played in the top flight of English football he must come near the top. |  | | |  |
| Mo Salah on 17:10 - Jan 2 with 1195 views | franz_tyson |
I fear the same with Drinan. |  | | |
| Mo Salah on 17:45 - Jan 2 with 1143 views | Churchman |
| Mo Salah on 17:10 - Jan 2 by franz_tyson |
I fear the same with Drinan. |
And dear old Frank Nouble |  | | |
| Mo Salah on 17:47 - Jan 2 with 1135 views | textbackup |
| Mo Salah on 17:45 - Jan 2 by Churchman |
And dear old Frank Nouble |
was at the WW game the other day, sat in with the fans |  |
| |
| Mo Salah on 18:08 - Jan 2 with 1101 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
Since selling Mo Salah, Chelsea have won the league, FA Cup, Europa League, Champions League and Super Cup
I suspect they’re probably ok with it |  |
| |
| Mo Salah on 19:34 - Jan 2 with 988 views | J2BLUE |
Best in the world. Looking forward to watching him for Egypt in the coming weeks. |  |
| |
| Mo Salah on 22:07 - Jan 2 with 888 views | vapour_trail |
| Mo Salah on 18:08 - Jan 2 by C_HealyIsAPleasure |
Since selling Mo Salah, Chelsea have won the league, FA Cup, Europa League, Champions League and Super Cup
I suspect they’re probably ok with it |
However, they would be a vastly superior side with him in their XI. Op is bang on the money. It was the Jose years that also saw Lukaku and De Bruyne burnt off. |  |
| |
| Mo Salah on 23:06 - Jan 2 with 813 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
| Mo Salah on 22:07 - Jan 2 by vapour_trail |
However, they would be a vastly superior side with him in their XI. Op is bang on the money. It was the Jose years that also saw Lukaku and De Bruyne burnt off. |
That’s a simplistic take I’m afraid. Ignoring the obvious point that those players may not have become what they’ve become now without moving, Chelsea’s entire model has for years been based around trading young players for profit, with those profits helping fund expensive signings for the first team
Notionally I’m sure Chelsea would rather they had let certain players but you can’t really just keep a KDB or a Salah without also keeping say a Bertrand Traore, and then not buying a Diego Costa, or a Hazard or a Kante. Which brings us neatly back to the point that what they’ve done has undoubtedly worked for them, as they continue to challenge for and win trophies [Post edited 2 Jan 2022 23:06]
| |
| |
| Mo Salah on 10:55 - Jan 3 with 537 views | J2BLUE |
| Mo Salah on 23:06 - Jan 2 by C_HealyIsAPleasure |
That’s a simplistic take I’m afraid. Ignoring the obvious point that those players may not have become what they’ve become now without moving, Chelsea’s entire model has for years been based around trading young players for profit, with those profits helping fund expensive signings for the first team
Notionally I’m sure Chelsea would rather they had let certain players but you can’t really just keep a KDB or a Salah without also keeping say a Bertrand Traore, and then not buying a Diego Costa, or a Hazard or a Kante. Which brings us neatly back to the point that what they’ve done has undoubtedly worked for them, as they continue to challenge for and win trophies [Post edited 2 Jan 2022 23:06]
|
This. Letting players go can be the right thing regardless of whether they go on to become good players or not.
If Chelsea kept him we may never have got to watch this version of Salah. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
