By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
I quite enjoy looking at reports of the same event from different sides of the political spectrum just to see how by reporting exactly the same thing, their use of language really changes the tone of the piece.
Boris's neighbour talking to the press is a wonderful example of this.
In the BBC he 'defends' taping the row - pretty neutral, thay is what he is doing having been attacked in the media for doing so.
In The Guardian he 'goes public' - pretty benign reporting.
So far as The Telegraph is concerned he 'admits' taping the row. That is a beautifully loaded term, it states the truth same way as the previous two but the use of 'admits' suggests he was somehow trying to hide it before.
Not hard to tell which of those is on his side and who is against him.