Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Les57 added 09:13 - Dec 27
Unable to see player lists so unable to rate players. Probably not a bad thing after today’s game. A bit disappointing after some good results lately. Thought the ref wanted to be centre of attention, and can anybody tell me how their right back /wingback (no.22) managed to stay on for 90 minutes.
3



Pilgrimblue added 09:36 - Dec 27
What's going on! No ratings!!

Very poor game but after some decent performances expected more but MM decided otherwise. It would have been an ideal game to introduce McKendry but Mick decided to play Sears who's a shadow or his former self. Iorfa his usual game, can't head the ball, can't pass and can't take throw-ins. All in all a waste and should be sent back. I'm sure Emmanuel could've done better.
So sad that Bishop went off after showing glimpses of why he was rated so highly. Back soon I hope.
7



Bluetone added 12:35 - Dec 27
Players rating list is not working
1



bluehook added 12:56 - Dec 27
Crap
2



bluehook added 12:56 - Dec 27
Double crap.
2



Orraman added 17:40 - Dec 27
There is no player list as, apart from Chambers and Webster they all scored 0
0



TonyHumesIpswich added 01:13 - Dec 28
Nobody deserved the man of the match award, sounds about right. Assume nobody voted so they all got 0, bit unfair on Chambers who may have won his first award in 3 seasons.
0



harlingblue added 01:32 - Dec 28
A bit of a damp squib of a game, after some much more encouraging home performances, such a pity a below par display was witnessed by a few doubters that gave the game a view.
Four changes to the more regular side spoiled the rhythm, and to be fair the subs bench contained players that looked far stronger than those donning the starting shirts. The lack of natural wing play (Celina and Ward) on the bench, and missing Skuse out injured, (he brings the best out of Connolly) made this look more like an Ipswich Cup side destined to lose.
QPR are a very poor side, and I'm sure that the normal Town team selection would have gained 3 points, Derby will prove far harder opposition.
0



You need to log in to participate in Your Report

Your Report

6 AugSunderland A1 - 213
9 AugBristol R CCR1H2 - 00
12 AugStoke City H2 - 05
19 AugQPR A0 - 13
26 AugLeeds H3 - 46
29 AugReading CCR2A2 - 22

2 SepCardiff City H3 - 28
16 SepSheff Wed A0 - 16
19 SepSouthampton A0 - 16
23 SepBlackburn H4 - 35
26 SepWolves CCR3H3 - 23
30 SepHuddersfield A1 - 13

3 OctHull City H3 - 06
7 OctPreston H4 - 24
25 OctBristol City A0 - 13
28 OctPlymouth H3 - 26

1 NovFulham CCR4H1 - 32
4 NovBirmingham A2 - 27
7 NovRotherham A2 - 22
11 NovSwansea H3 - 24
25 NovWBA A2 - 09
29 NovMillwall H3 - 13

2 DecCoventry City H2 - 16
9 DecMiddlesbrough A0 - 25
12 DecWatford A1 - 28
16 DecNorwich H2 - 28
23 DecLeeds A4 - 06
26 DecLeicester H1 - 16
29 DecQPR H0 - 09

1 JanStoke City A0 - 01
6 JanWimbledon FACR3A1 - 36
13 JanSunderland H2 - 113
22 JanLeicester A1 - 17
27 JanMaidstone FACR4H1 - 213

3 FebPreston A3 - 27
10 FebWBA H2 - 29
14 FebMillwall A0 - 45
17 FebSwansea A1 - 21
20 FebRotherham H4 - 310
24 FebBirmingham H3 - 13

2 MarPlymouth A0 - 25
5 MarBristol City H3 - 212
9 MarCardiff City A2 - 14
16 MarSheff Wed H6 - 010
29 MarBlackburn A0 - 13

1 AprSouthampton H3 - 27
6 AprNorwich A1 - 09
10 AprWatford H0 - 01
13 AprMiddlesbrough H1 - 11
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2024