By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
....and to give GB and Dollers a new thread to carry on with. You've got to love him for telling Morgan Stanley that they are right to be worried, oh by the way it's another general election Autumn 2018 according to them.......yippee !!
He's missed the point though. They didn't say they were worried for themselves, they produced a report for investors saying they should be worried about investing in the UK economy under a Labour government and that the policies they want to implemented would be worse than the economic consequences of Brexit.
"Jeremy Corbyn has told Morgan Stanley it is right to regard him as a threat, after the investment bank warned its clients that a Labour government could pose as much of a risk to British business as Brexit."
Interesting article, but what was the point of this paragraph: "It comes after he was pictured on the front page of GQ wearing a Marks & Spencer jacket and red tie, having given an interview for the magazine’s latest issue, which contains its annual list of the 50 best-dressed men in the UK."
He's missed the point though. They didn't say they were worried for themselves, they produced a report for investors saying they should be worried about investing in the UK economy under a Labour government and that the policies they want to implemented would be worse than the economic consequences of Brexit.
"Jeremy Corbyn has told Morgan Stanley it is right to regard him as a threat, after the investment bank warned its clients that a Labour government could pose as much of a risk to British business as Brexit."
He's missed the point though. They didn't say they were worried for themselves, they produced a report for investors saying they should be worried about investing in the UK economy under a Labour government and that the policies they want to implemented would be worse than the economic consequences of Brexit.
"Jeremy Corbyn has told Morgan Stanley it is right to regard him as a threat, after the investment bank warned its clients that a Labour government could pose as much of a risk to British business as Brexit."
Bit worrying that he misses the entire point.
Good picture though.
SB
[Post edited 1 Dec 2017 9:48]
“Spending priorities … shift in favour of low-income households and the public sector and away from outsourcers and defence companies,” the report continued. (Morgan Stanley) .........perish the thought !
"They break our legs and tell us to be grateful when they offer us crutches."
He really is going full David Cameron - not just with a proper suit, but the makeup / airbrushing of the photo. Remember Daves poster campaign in 2010 with the china-doll like complexion?
i appreciate this might just be the GQ editors doing their usual thing, but it's not beyond feasible that Labour PR bods were involved in the presentation.
“Spending priorities … shift in favour of low-income households and the public sector and away from outsourcers and defence companies,” the report continued. (Morgan Stanley) .........perish the thought !
He really is going full David Cameron - not just with a proper suit, but the makeup / airbrushing of the photo. Remember Daves poster campaign in 2010 with the china-doll like complexion?
i appreciate this might just be the GQ editors doing their usual thing, but it's not beyond feasible that Labour PR bods were involved in the presentation.
I think it's a rather good photo actually regardless of the touch-ups.
How do you know that? That is total speculation, one could just as easily argue you are seeing what you want to see.
Is whataboutery OK now then? You moan about it on here all the time.
SB
He's not stupid. It's pretty damn obvious what he's doing.
You're the one seeing what he wants to see. Do you honestly think he doesn't understand what MS have said?! Come on.
I've not said whether the whataboutery it's good or bad in Jezza's context. But for the record it's not always bad. If someone's being an utter hypocrite it's relevant.
And I've not said that you are Morgan Stanley. It's part of their warning to investors on the perceived perils of a Labour government. Love you Stokie !
"They break our legs and tell us to be grateful when they offer us crutches."
He's not stupid. It's pretty damn obvious what he's doing.
You're the one seeing what he wants to see. Do you honestly think he doesn't understand what MS have said?! Come on.
I've not said whether the whataboutery it's good or bad in Jezza's context. But for the record it's not always bad. If someone's being an utter hypocrite it's relevant.
I do think he is entirely capable of willfully missing the point. It's easy for one to do that, everybody does it. He should be addressing their points on what will happen to the economy rather than ignoring them. How has what he said helped ally the fears of people wanting to invest in the UK? We need investment after the farce that is brexit.
I do think he is entirely capable of willfully missing the point. It's easy for one to do that, everybody does it. He should be addressing their points on what will happen to the economy rather than ignoring them. How has what he said helped ally the fears of people wanting to invest in the UK? We need investment after the farce that is brexit.
I've not said he's stupid either.
SB
[Post edited 1 Dec 2017 10:12]
Well yes, you're quite right. Maybe he's just getting better at this whole 'being a politician' thing.
But that wasn't your original point. You thought he'd just missed the point (not wilfully) - "Bit worrying that he misses the entire point."
My edit to respond to your edit: You insinuated he's stupid by suggesting he'd simply missed the point Morgan Stanley were making.
I've not changed my original stance and I've not insinuated he's stupid.
You are doing it again, exactly like the thread the other day.
SB
What did you mean by "bit worrying he misses the entire point" then?
All I've done is countered your point. It's becoming apparent what your problem is - you don't like people challenging your points. Unfortunately this is a discussion forum. Again, I've done nothing wrong (just like I did nothing wrong in the thread the other day). I've merely countered your original point.
What did you mean by "bit worrying he misses the entire point" then?
All I've done is countered your point. It's becoming apparent what your problem is - you don't like people challenging your points. Unfortunately this is a discussion forum. Again, I've done nothing wrong (just like I did nothing wrong in the thread the other day). I've merely countered your original point.
You too.....
"They break our legs and tell us to be grateful when they offer us crutches."
What did you mean by "bit worrying he misses the entire point" then?
All I've done is countered your point. It's becoming apparent what your problem is - you don't like people challenging your points. Unfortunately this is a discussion forum. Again, I've done nothing wrong (just like I did nothing wrong in the thread the other day). I've merely countered your original point.
I have no problem with people challenging my points, that is your remit I am afraid. You haven't offered any evidence for your interpretation of the article, you've made assumptions and stated them as facts.
I think he missed the point of the investor report as highlighted in my original quote where he said they should be worried. You think differently. That is fine, we are allowed to have different views but you don't see it that way - you have to be confirmed as "right" hence the micro-analysis of every word in every post.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
