| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) 12:56 - May 30 with 2898 views | homer_123 |
|  |
| |  |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 12:58 - May 30 with 1683 views | SWGF |
330+
Which may require Buttler to be Buttler! |  |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 12:59 - May 30 with 1676 views | homer_123 |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 12:58 - May 30 by SWGF |
330+
Which may require Buttler to be Buttler! |
I was thinking 340 plus....200-3 at the mo. | |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:00 - May 30 with 1673 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
From here, S Africa will be very pleased if they keep us below 300. At the beginning par score was around 345 I believe and not much to suggest that is wrong. Anything above that puts us very firmly in the driving seat.
If they can take wickets we will probably be a little over 300, if they don't we should be 350ish. |  |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:01 - May 30 with 1668 views | Coastalblue |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 12:59 - May 30 by homer_123 |
I was thinking 340 plus....200-3 at the mo. |
Agree, I think 340-350.
Having said that, having seen Archer's opening spell against Pakistan at the Oval before the rain spoiled the game if he can bowl like he did then he was almost unplayable. |  |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:03 - May 30 with 1660 views | catch74 |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:00 - May 30 by Nthsuffolkblue |
From here, S Africa will be very pleased if they keep us below 300. At the beginning par score was around 345 I believe and not much to suggest that is wrong. Anything above that puts us very firmly in the driving seat.
If they can take wickets we will probably be a little over 300, if they don't we should be 350ish. |
They can have 1 wicket - get Butler in - then it’s 550. |  |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:04 - May 30 with 1656 views | SWGF |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 12:59 - May 30 by homer_123 |
I was thinking 340 plus....200-3 at the mo. |
One of these to to really go on, and Buttler to come in and come off. Who knows... | |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:04 - May 30 with 1654 views | catch74 |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:03 - May 30 by catch74 |
They can have 1 wicket - get Butler in - then it’s 550. |
Ffs apologies, I’ve definitely caught the Gainsboroughs. | |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:05 - May 30 with 1645 views | SWGF |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:04 - May 30 by SWGF |
One of these to to really go on, and Buttler to come in and come off. Who knows... |
Right...so Stokes needs to go on! | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:12 - May 30 with 1626 views | homer_123 |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:05 - May 30 by SWGF |
Right...so Stokes needs to go on! |
Yep, need to get on the gas now. | |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:12 - May 30 with 1624 views | homer_123 |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:04 - May 30 by catch74 |
Ffs apologies, I’ve definitely caught the Gainsboroughs. |
You tart! ;) | |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:16 - May 30 with 1612 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:04 - May 30 by catch74 |
Ffs apologies, I’ve definitely caught the Gainsboroughs. |
Wasn't sure if you hit the wrong key or were using hyperbole! | |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:26 - May 30 with 1594 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
That's a big blow for SA.
We will dig in for a bit now and aim more for 330ish. | |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:27 - May 30 with 1589 views | SWGF |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:12 - May 30 by homer_123 |
Yep, need to get on the gas now. |
Hmmm....I'm not sure whether it's the pitch or the bowling but there havent been that many really well-timed shots, even from the batsmen who've been in. Suppose we'll know once SA have a go. 300 might be a decent total. | |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:30 - May 30 with 1583 views | homer_123 |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:27 - May 30 by SWGF |
Hmmm....I'm not sure whether it's the pitch or the bowling but there havent been that many really well-timed shots, even from the batsmen who've been in. Suppose we'll know once SA have a go. 300 might be a decent total. |
This could be quite tight. | |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:33 - May 30 with 1575 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:30 - May 30 by homer_123 |
This could be quite tight. |
300 will give us something to bowl at. We should still get significantly above it. Their slower bowlers have been fairly effective. | |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:34 - May 30 with 1562 views | catch74 |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:16 - May 30 by Nthsuffolkblue |
Wasn't sure if you hit the wrong key or were using hyperbole! |
Hyperbole it was! feel 310 now would be ok. As had already been said def wanted 330+. | |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:38 - May 30 with 1556 views | homer_123 |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:33 - May 30 by Nthsuffolkblue |
300 will give us something to bowl at. We should still get significantly above it. Their slower bowlers have been fairly effective. |
Yes, hope so, I'd really like to see it 310+ now though...anything under 300 will really give SA something to go for. | |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:38 - May 30 with 1551 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
SA have fielded a lot better than the other sides we have played recently.
They don't seem to be missing Stein as much as I would have expected. | |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:39 - May 30 with 1552 views | Reuser_is_God |
SA have bowled & fielded very well here. |  |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:40 - May 30 with 1546 views | homer_123 |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:39 - May 30 by Reuser_is_God |
SA have bowled & fielded very well here. |
They are going to seriously chuffed with this Moen now gone as well. | |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:44 - May 30 with 1532 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
5 overs to get 50 runs which will be OK.
Only 4 wickets in hand though. | |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:47 - May 30 with 1529 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
"Got away with one". Depends on how much it has actually hurt him. May well affect the rest of his deliveries. | |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:58 - May 30 with 1509 views | homer_123 |
Woakes C&B? | |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 14:00 - May 30 with 1501 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 13:58 - May 30 by homer_123 |
Woakes C&B? |
Was close.
Wasted review on the LBW though. | |
| |
| Given it's a batting wicket, what do we think total wise is needed then? (n/t) on 14:00 - May 30 with 1502 views | vilanovablue |
I don't think we'll score enough but until we've actually had a bowl I'm not sure and 300 might be plenty. I doubt it though. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
