| Assuming Palace get Solanke 11:15 - Jan 1 with 1029 views | bontcho |
Does that make Wickham a realistic option for us? Obviously wages are difficult but they’ll just want him to play games won’t they? |  |
| |  |
| Assuming Palace get Solanke on 11:23 - Jan 1 with 992 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
I doubt it.
But would be more than happy with that.
Would have thought palace need all the bodies they can get. |  |
| |
| Assuming Palace get Solanke on 11:25 - Jan 1 with 976 views | sparks |
| Assuming Palace get Solanke on 11:23 - Jan 1 by Marshalls_Mullet |
I doubt it.
But would be more than happy with that.
Would have thought palace need all the bodies they can get. |
He has barely played for a long time. Wouldnt be a particularly clever idea imo. |  |
| The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it.
(Sir Terry Pratchett) | | Poll: | Is Fred drunk this morning? |
| |
| Assuming Palace get Solanke on 11:28 - Jan 1 with 954 views | Devereuxxx |
Very much doubt it, he's been pretty involved since he came back from injury (mostly off the bench).
On a different note, i'm still annoyed we let Kieffer Moore go for so little this time last year. Could have been a useful option for us this year. The club seemed to get so excited they had an asset which had improved in value & that other clubs were interested in they couldn't wait to grab some cash. |  | | |
| Assuming Palace get Solanke on 11:29 - Jan 1 with 947 views | Dennyx4 |
Radio Suffolk were reporting that Wickham was going to Middlesboro on the last game.
Whispers from the press in the North East. |  | | |
| Assuming Palace get Solanke on 11:29 - Jan 1 with 939 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Assuming Palace get Solanke on 11:25 - Jan 1 by sparks |
He has barely played for a long time. Wouldnt be a particularly clever idea imo. |
He'd be more than capable for us!
Doubt we'd have better options.
Also unlikely that we'd get him.
Heavily linked with Boro. | |
| |
| Assuming Palace get Solanke on 11:30 - Jan 1 with 937 views | bontcho |
| Assuming Palace get Solanke on 11:25 - Jan 1 by sparks |
He has barely played for a long time. Wouldnt be a particularly clever idea imo. |
Could go either way, obviously, and if we only went for one striker I’d say no, but if we get a ‘proper’ centre forward then CW could be used up front or out wide. | |
| |
| Assuming Palace get Solanke on 11:42 - Jan 1 with 869 views | pointofblue |
| Assuming Palace get Solanke on 11:28 - Jan 1 by Devereuxxx |
Very much doubt it, he's been pretty involved since he came back from injury (mostly off the bench).
On a different note, i'm still annoyed we let Kieffer Moore go for so little this time last year. Could have been a useful option for us this year. The club seemed to get so excited they had an asset which had improved in value & that other clubs were interested in they couldn't wait to grab some cash. |
We should have left him out on loan and allowed the new manager to make a decision on him. Letting Smith go was disappointing too but I think he wanted to leave. To be fair, Hurst would have probably flogged both anyway. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
