| Howard Foster!!!!!!! (n/t) 22:50 - Mar 31 with 1118 views | WicklowBlue |
|  | | |  |
| Howard Foster!!!!!!! (n/t) on 22:55 - Mar 31 with 1061 views | TresBonne |
Wardley fought with one eye closed for the majority of it.
Howard Foster must've watched it with both closed, to pull 115-112 out his arse. |  | | |
| Howard Foster!!!!!!! (n/t) on 22:57 - Mar 31 with 1031 views | Herbivore |
There's no way Clarke won 8 or 9 rounds, imo. Thought that card was off. Wardley edged it for me but it was a very close fight, absolute war. |  |
| |
| Howard Foster!!!!!!! (n/t) on 23:00 - Mar 31 with 977 views | gtsb1966 |
| Howard Foster!!!!!!! (n/t) on 22:57 - Mar 31 by Herbivore |
There's no way Clarke won 8 or 9 rounds, imo. Thought that card was off. Wardley edged it for me but it was a very close fight, absolute war. |
I thought Clarke edged it. Wardley relied too much on one punch. Nobody can argue with a draw though. |  | | |
| Howard Foster!!!!!!! (n/t) on 23:04 - Mar 31 with 920 views | Nutkins_Return |
| Howard Foster!!!!!!! (n/t) on 22:55 - Mar 31 by TresBonne |
Wardley fought with one eye closed for the majority of it.
Howard Foster must've watched it with both closed, to pull 115-112 out his arse. |
Absolutely shockingly poor card. For me Wardley won it by one but at the same time a draw or Clarke win by one was possible. But 115-112 with a 10-8 a point deduction is criminal when Wardley clearly had the better of some of the other rounds/nothing between them etc. still the end result is fair |  | | |
| Howard Foster!!!!!!! (n/t) on 23:09 - Mar 31 with 869 views | WicklowBlue |
| Howard Foster!!!!!!! (n/t) on 23:04 - Mar 31 by Nutkins_Return |
Absolutely shockingly poor card. For me Wardley won it by one but at the same time a draw or Clarke win by one was possible. But 115-112 with a 10-8 a point deduction is criminal when Wardley clearly had the better of some of the other rounds/nothing between them etc. still the end result is fair |
Clarke was the tidier boxer, but for Foster to give him 3 rounds after Clarke had been down and a point deduction was madness!!!
Agree we want to see that fight again, but really Fabio should have won on the cards. | | | |
| Howard Foster!!!!!!! (n/t) on 23:13 - Mar 31 with 826 views | Herbivore |
| Howard Foster!!!!!!! (n/t) on 23:09 - Mar 31 by WicklowBlue |
Clarke was the tidier boxer, but for Foster to give him 3 rounds after Clarke had been down and a point deduction was madness!!!
Agree we want to see that fight again, but really Fabio should have won on the cards. |
Yeah, genuinely think the best you can get to for Clarke is a draw because of the knockdown and point deduction. That's him winning 7 rounds to 5, I don't think he won more than 7 rounds, personally. | |
| |
| Howard Foster!!!!!!! (n/t) on 23:35 - Mar 31 with 748 views | norfsufblue |
Can only think if you checked his wallet it might possibly have horribly coloured season ticket in there! |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
