| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) 14:36 - Mar 9 with 1231 views | Woolfenthen |
|  | | |  |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 14:44 - Mar 9 with 1193 views | Fenblue |
Just what I said when he was taken off |  | | |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 14:46 - Mar 9 with 1172 views | Vaughan8 |
Definitely in hindsight.
I understand the sub but we lost Moore ability to hold it up as well as his aerial threat. | | | |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 14:48 - Mar 9 with 1156 views | LeoMuff |
He looked shattered Tbf and Ali pressures well |  |
| |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 14:49 - Mar 9 with 1134 views | Ryorry |
Did you see how he was holding his head and the bandage after he scored? Absolutely correct sub on player welfare grounds alone. |  |
| |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 14:49 - Mar 9 with 1131 views | _clive_baker_ |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 14:48 - Mar 9 by LeoMuff |
He looked shattered Tbf and Ali pressures well |
That was the logic, Ali to get us up the pitch with his pace and physicality. Didn’t work particularly, but easy to say it in hindsight. |  | | |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 14:50 - Mar 9 with 1098 views | cressi |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 14:46 - Mar 9 by Vaughan8 |
Definitely in hindsight.
I understand the sub but we lost Moore ability to hold it up as well as his aerial threat. |
Moore hold the ball up couldn't trap a bag of cement good goal performance done very little like Tuesday night a good loan would I buy probably not. | | | |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 14:51 - Mar 9 with 1095 views | WicklowBlue |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 14:48 - Mar 9 by LeoMuff |
He looked shattered Tbf and Ali pressures well |
Agreed Moore looked completely knackered when he came off. Plenty of chances to clear our box on both goals and we didn't.
Onto the next one, really doubt any of the top 3 will win all their games. Plus we're doing it the Ipswich roller coaster way.  |  | | |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 14:53 - Mar 9 with 1068 views | Ryorry |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 14:50 - Mar 9 by cressi |
Moore hold the ball up couldn't trap a bag of cement good goal performance done very little like Tuesday night a good loan would I buy probably not. |
You missed his last ditch clearance off the line to stop them going ahead in the first half then. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 15:34 - Mar 9 with 999 views | gainsboroughblue |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 14:51 - Mar 9 by WicklowBlue |
Agreed Moore looked completely knackered when he came off. Plenty of chances to clear our box on both goals and we didn't.
Onto the next one, really doubt any of the top 3 will win all their games. Plus we're doing it the Ipswich roller coaster way. |
It's a shame because just before he went off, Moore was chasing down more and better than he had been previously. He also won a couple of headers in a row that pushed play out of our own half. |  |
| |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 16:20 - Mar 9 with 898 views | stonojnr |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 15:34 - Mar 9 by gainsboroughblue |
It's a shame because just before he went off, Moore was chasing down more and better than he had been previously. He also won a couple of headers in a row that pushed play out of our own half. |
And his head wound was bleeding again which would either have required more delay on pitch to treat, so even more injury time or time off the pitch and we play with 10.
We had most of the team defending that corner, plenty of players to block it, any of them had a chance to clear it, and they didn't, that's all | | | |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 17:37 - Mar 9 with 813 views | OldFart71 |
Can't expect Moroe to do everything, he's been superb since joining us what's that 6 in 9 games. That's a good return. I do think Travis should come in and rest Loungo or possibly rest both midfielders and try Travis and Taylor. Sarmiento and Hutchinson aren't as effective starting as they are coming on as subs, do feel that should we achieve Prem status that an upgrade on Woolfy is necessary. He has been responsible for several goals against recently. | | | |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 17:39 - Mar 9 with 808 views | textbackup |
Especially if he had needed to control it in his own box, it would have been cleared up the pitch. |  |
| |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 08:13 - Mar 10 with 626 views | smithy69 |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 14:50 - Mar 9 by cressi |
Moore hold the ball up couldn't trap a bag of cement good goal performance done very little like Tuesday night a good loan would I buy probably not. |
Absolute nonsense | | | |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 13:20 - Mar 10 with 517 views | ArnieM |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 08:13 - Mar 10 by smithy69 |
Absolute nonsense |
I feel his first touch when receiving the ball is often a little loose and he will lose possession, so maybe not absolute nonsense. |  |
| |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 13:32 - Mar 10 with 487 views | pointofblue |
| Moore would have been useful in the box at the end, poor sub??? (n/t) on 17:37 - Mar 9 by OldFart71 |
Can't expect Moroe to do everything, he's been superb since joining us what's that 6 in 9 games. That's a good return. I do think Travis should come in and rest Loungo or possibly rest both midfielders and try Travis and Taylor. Sarmiento and Hutchinson aren't as effective starting as they are coming on as subs, do feel that should we achieve Prem status that an upgrade on Woolfy is necessary. He has been responsible for several goals against recently. |
Name the goals Woolfenden has been responsible for, outside of Birmingham (and even then it wasn't him alone).
Then look at the rest of the back four and Hladky. [Post edited 10 Mar 13:46]
| |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
