| Bit more direct? 11:55 - Feb 15 with 884 views | tortoise |
Anyone think we went a bit more direct more often from Hladky last night? Not saying we didn’t go short, just maybe not quite so often. Wonder if this is a slight change of approach due to mistakes or maybe I’m just imagining it! |  | | |  |
| Bit more direct? on 11:58 - Feb 15 with 866 views | SomethingBlue |
We did mix it up a bit more, I doubt because of errors but more to keep the oppo guessing. Moore can obviously win headers but he's very good at making the ball stick to chest/feet and is a really good outlet if the direct ball is a decent one. | |
| |
| Bit more direct? on 12:50 - Feb 15 with 727 views | Lord_Lucan |
I prefer the old approach of knocking backwards and forwards and then break.
Hooever, we have to accommodate our new personnel and it also has to be said that teams had sussed us out. |  |
| |
| Bit more direct? on 13:01 - Feb 15 with 687 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Bit more direct? on 11:58 - Feb 15 by SomethingBlue |
We did mix it up a bit more, I doubt because of errors but more to keep the oppo guessing. Moore can obviously win headers but he's very good at making the ball stick to chest/feet and is a really good outlet if the direct ball is a decent one. |
Agree. If you have TownTv watch the Moore Cam from the West Brom game.
It shows how much he does and most of it is on the ground, not in the air. |  | | |
| Bit more direct? on 14:11 - Feb 15 with 590 views | northants |
Noticed this over the last two games.....a definite ask to mix things up, particularly having been caught once too often |  | | |
| Bit more direct? on 14:17 - Feb 15 with 560 views | Ewan_Oozami |
Case in point: the Hladky throw starting the move that lead to the Al-Hamadi penalty... |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
