| I think people are being a bit naive over the definition of free 10:04 - Apr 29 with 624 views | MannersBlue |
Sorry to make another post on the topic, but I can't believe the amount of people up in arms over the season ticket compensation.
Whilst I think that what has been offered is definitely at the lower end of what they could have given, I think people are deliberately misunderstanding what 'free iFollow' meant.
During a regular season, if the club had offered ST holders a free pint at each game, would people be trying to claim a refund on the pints they didn't drink? Or the games they didn't attend for that matter?
...who am I kidding, I can see the tweets now... "What are you going to be offering ST holders who don't drink??!?" |  | | |  |
| I think people are being a bit naive over the definition of free on 10:19 - Apr 29 with 553 views | Fixed_It |
I think people are being deliberately thick so that they can play the entitled card. Pathetic really. |  |
| |
| I think people are being a bit naive over the definition of free on 10:38 - Apr 29 with 496 views | SWGF |
| I think people are being a bit naive over the definition of free on 10:19 - Apr 29 by Fixed_It |
I think people are being deliberately thick so that they can play the entitled card. Pathetic really. |
Not sure that's strictly true in all cases. There is ambiguity in how you can read/understand the emails and comms from the Club which could have been easily resolved had the Club chosen to clarify exactly what it all meant; "We're saying "free" but that means you don't have to pay extra rather than it being a perk", etc. However, I'm not sure the Club did know what it meant or how it'd pan out. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
