Why 12? Why not 48? 21:59 - Feb 4 with 815 views | BLUEBEAT | These are 4-sided pillars, right? Do they intend to ‘wrap’ 1 player around 1 pillar? Could have a different player for every flat side... | |
| | |
Why 12? Why not 48? on 22:02 - Feb 4 with 799 views | Nthsuffolkblue | Could have the League-winning team on one set of sides, the FA Cup-winning one on another, the UEFA-Cup winning one on a third set … perhaps the fourth set could be left blank or we can make the pillars triangular? | |
| |
Why 12? Why not 48? on 23:08 - Feb 4 with 714 views | BLUEBEAT |
Why 12? Why not 48? on 22:02 - Feb 4 by Nthsuffolkblue | Could have the League-winning team on one set of sides, the FA Cup-winning one on another, the UEFA-Cup winning one on a third set … perhaps the fourth set could be left blank or we can make the pillars triangular? |
The 99/00 playoff winners were probably our last ‘great’ team... | |
| |
Why 12? Why not 48? on 23:15 - Feb 4 with 702 views | Oldsmoker | Is this the idea that everyone who took part gets a prize? If you want to show the greats then limit the numbers so that those shown really are great. If we fill every available pillar then theres no room for future greats. | |
| |
Why 12? Why not 48? on 23:37 - Feb 4 with 682 views | BLUEBEAT |
Why 12? Why not 48? on 23:15 - Feb 4 by Oldsmoker | Is this the idea that everyone who took part gets a prize? If you want to show the greats then limit the numbers so that those shown really are great. If we fill every available pillar then theres no room for future greats. |
“future greats” That’s the spirit! | |
| |
| |