Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Why 12? Why not 48? 21:59 - Feb 4 with 815 viewsBLUEBEAT

These are 4-sided pillars, right?

Do they intend to ‘wrap’ 1 player around 1 pillar?

Could have a different player for every flat side...

Poll: W or W

0
Why 12? Why not 48? on 22:02 - Feb 4 with 799 viewsNthsuffolkblue

Could have the League-winning team on one set of sides, the FA Cup-winning one on another, the UEFA-Cup winning one on a third set … perhaps the fourth set could be left blank or we can make the pillars triangular?

Poll: Is Jeremy Clarkson misogynistic, racist or plain nasty?
Blog: [Blog] Ghostbusters

0
Why 12? Why not 48? on 23:08 - Feb 4 with 714 viewsBLUEBEAT

Why 12? Why not 48? on 22:02 - Feb 4 by Nthsuffolkblue

Could have the League-winning team on one set of sides, the FA Cup-winning one on another, the UEFA-Cup winning one on a third set … perhaps the fourth set could be left blank or we can make the pillars triangular?


The 99/00 playoff winners were probably our last ‘great’ team...

Poll: W or W

0
Why 12? Why not 48? on 23:15 - Feb 4 with 702 viewsOldsmoker

Is this the idea that everyone who took part gets a prize?
If you want to show the greats then limit the numbers so that those shown really are great.
If we fill every available pillar then theres no room for future greats.

Don't believe a word I say. I'm only kidding. Or am I?
Poll: What mode is best?

0
Why 12? Why not 48? on 23:37 - Feb 4 with 682 viewsBLUEBEAT

Why 12? Why not 48? on 23:15 - Feb 4 by Oldsmoker

Is this the idea that everyone who took part gets a prize?
If you want to show the greats then limit the numbers so that those shown really are great.
If we fill every available pillar then theres no room for future greats.


“future greats”

That’s the spirit!

Poll: W or W

2
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2024