| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? 11:30 - Feb 1 with 1136 views | unstableblue |
Rather than Nolan or Dozzell??
With 3 centre backs that may reduce the service to Judge.
But Skuse should hopefully have a BIG performance given his absence, point to prove. We’ll need Downes going forward.
Edwards could get exposed today.
Win and we’re in a good place. Lose and big question marks will return. |  |
| |  |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 11:59 - Feb 1 with 1034 views | pointofblue |
I think so; if we were playing a lower half team, or coming off the back of a good result, we may have leaned towards Dozzell. After the dismal performance in midweek I think we might go safety first.
Norris
Woolfenden - Wilson - Chambers
Edwards - Skuse - Downes - Garbutt
Judge
Norwood - Jackson
Subs: Holy, Kenlock, Donacien, Dozzell, Nolan, Sears, Keane |  |
| |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:01 - Feb 1 with 1028 views | sparks |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 11:59 - Feb 1 by pointofblue |
I think so; if we were playing a lower half team, or coming off the back of a good result, we may have leaned towards Dozzell. After the dismal performance in midweek I think we might go safety first.
Norris
Woolfenden - Wilson - Chambers
Edwards - Skuse - Downes - Garbutt
Judge
Norwood - Jackson
Subs: Holy, Kenlock, Donacien, Dozzell, Nolan, Sears, Keane |
Thats really negative- the CBs will really have to push on if we are to create. |  |
| The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it.
(Sir Terry Pratchett) | | Poll: | Is Fred drunk this morning? |
| |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:02 - Feb 1 with 1018 views | unstableblue |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:01 - Feb 1 by sparks |
Thats really negative- the CBs will really have to push on if we are to create. |
Will be interesting to see the possession stats | |
| |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:05 - Feb 1 with 1007 views | sparks |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:02 - Feb 1 by unstableblue |
Will be interesting to see the possession stats |
Posession might well be good- but creativity? Judge doesnt generally create- so without attack minded midfielders coming from deeper we could be wholly reliant on the wing backs, and the CBs to create overload. | |
| The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it.
(Sir Terry Pratchett) | | Poll: | Is Fred drunk this morning? |
| |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:11 - Feb 1 with 987 views | Garv |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:05 - Feb 1 by sparks |
Posession might well be good- but creativity? Judge doesnt generally create- so without attack minded midfielders coming from deeper we could be wholly reliant on the wing backs, and the CBs to create overload. |
Judge created our only proper chance against Rotherham, in fairness to him. |  |
| |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:12 - Feb 1 with 974 views | sparks |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:11 - Feb 1 by Garv |
Judge created our only proper chance against Rotherham, in fairness to him. |
I think he is very fortunate Teddy has a problem tbh. | |
| The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it.
(Sir Terry Pratchett) | | Poll: | Is Fred drunk this morning? |
| |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:16 - Feb 1 with 960 views | JDB23 |
We look awful in a 3-5-2 with Skuse and Downes. Rather we just play 4-3-3 if given the choice between them but don't see why Dozzell can't come in in place of Huws. | | | |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:22 - Feb 1 with 943 views | sparks |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:16 - Feb 1 by JDB23 |
We look awful in a 3-5-2 with Skuse and Downes. Rather we just play 4-3-3 if given the choice between them but don't see why Dozzell can't come in in place of Huws. |
Dozzell would be the more natural- but less "safe" replacement imo. | |
| The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it.
(Sir Terry Pratchett) | | Poll: | Is Fred drunk this morning? |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:24 - Feb 1 with 941 views | pelles321 |
I wonder if Dobra might be on the bench. Could have the kind of impact Bishop has had for Judge in the last 15 minutes if needed. Always good to have someone in the squad capable of running at people. |  | | |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:27 - Feb 1 with 922 views | shefki86 |
Norris
Chambers-Wilson-Woolf
Edwards-Downes-Skuse-Garbutt
Judge
Jackson-Norwood [Post edited 1 Feb 2020 12:29]
| |
| |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:29 - Feb 1 with 910 views | Herbivore |
Dozzell is too lightweight, last time he played alongside Downes we got thrashed at Lincoln. Not his fault but they just walked through us that day. Got to be Skuse for me as with their attacking threat we need some solidity in midfield. |  |
| |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:34 - Feb 1 with 889 views | Garv |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:12 - Feb 1 by sparks |
I think he is very fortunate Teddy has a problem tbh. |
Perhaps. Bishop isn't an assist/goal machine himself though. | |
| |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:41 - Feb 1 with 850 views | Herbivore |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:11 - Feb 1 by Garv |
Judge created our only proper chance against Rotherham, in fairness to him. |
He was toss again on the whole though. | |
| |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:47 - Feb 1 with 833 views | unstableblue |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:24 - Feb 1 by pelles321 |
I wonder if Dobra might be on the bench. Could have the kind of impact Bishop has had for Judge in the last 15 minutes if needed. Always good to have someone in the squad capable of running at people. |
I was thinking the same... he has the pace to change the game | |
| |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:49 - Feb 1 with 824 views | Herbivore |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:47 - Feb 1 by unstableblue |
I was thinking the same... he has the pace to change the game |
We need to start using him. He's got the ability to be a game changer and we don't have many of those. We will also lose him if he can't see a path to first team football here. Brighton sniffing around is a worry. | |
| |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:51 - Feb 1 with 812 views | pointofblue |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 12:29 - Feb 1 by Herbivore |
Dozzell is too lightweight, last time he played alongside Downes we got thrashed at Lincoln. Not his fault but they just walked through us that day. Got to be Skuse for me as with their attacking threat we need some solidity in midfield. |
I think I agree. Keep it tight and hope to nick it. How the heck we’re in this position with our squad I have no idea but that’s where we are at the moment. | |
| |
| So do we think it’s Skuse in for Huws? on 13:00 - Feb 1 with 754 views | Keaneish |
I’d have thought it’d be Nolan haven he came on for Huws. Still have expecting Huws to be fit. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
