| Really poor for 80mins... technical concerns again 21:53 - Jan 28 with 1059 views | unstableblue |
Those Rotherham players were better technically: individually and in their playing system all game, despite our huffing and puffing and possession. They had the outlet, they had the switch of play.
Again we struggled with a better technical side, despite holding an excellent Oxford in poor conditions recently.
I hope this was an off night from the players, and the last 10mins had some merit. But I cannot get over this niggle in my mind that we have yet another manager who is not setting up the team effectively. We have the individuals - but is the technical coaching to cope with tougher, better organised teams in place.
I should add that Downes was excellent in certain aspects of his game tonight.
Sears touch was poor when he came on.
That was almost a worldy from Norwood.
Garbutt has his worse game in ages, but what a free kick.
Huws was going down cul de sacs.
|  |
| |  |
| Really poor for 80mins... technical concerns again on 00:30 - Jan 29 with 959 views | Ryorry |
Cripes. Makes me glad I was on an evening out.
Sounds significant that you think "Garbutt has his worse game in ages", considering how useful his crosses & assists have been lately. |  |
| |
| Really poor for 80mins... technical concerns again on 08:09 - Jan 29 with 822 views | unstableblue |
| Really poor for 80mins... technical concerns again on 00:30 - Jan 29 by Ryorry |
Cripes. Makes me glad I was on an evening out.
Sounds significant that you think "Garbutt has his worse game in ages", considering how useful his crosses & assists have been lately. |
You did well to swerve it Ryorry... Jackson summed it up we weren't at the races.
Garbutt still managed a wunder free kick. I thought Downes had some really good moments - he is a class act. The whole night could have turned via a frankly unbelievable effort from Norwood in the closing minutes, it was a sorcery.
It wasn't the worse performance ever as some are saying...we at least had good possession, we just were technically poor in our shape and short passing, and we just went long, albeit this had a lot to do with a Rotherham press across the pitch. I thought our Boxing Day performance was far more hapless - and of course for worse performances see circa 2018 - Ipswich 0 (bottom) Burton 0.... now that was bad.
Going to need to break this higher club hoodoo in the next two games. | |
| |
| Really poor for 80mins... technical concerns again on 08:14 - Jan 29 with 798 views | Herbivore |
They weren't technical, they were just big lads with big forearms. Roy Keane would have loved them. |  |
| |
| Really poor for 80mins... technical concerns again on 08:42 - Jan 29 with 723 views | itfcjoe |
They weren't a technical side, they were just heavy pressers and big strong lads
A combined 53% pass success rate between the sides tells the story |  |
| |
| Really poor for 80mins... technical concerns again on 09:51 - Jan 29 with 641 views | Herbivore |
| Really poor for 80mins... technical concerns again on 08:42 - Jan 29 by itfcjoe |
They weren't a technical side, they were just heavy pressers and big strong lads
A combined 53% pass success rate between the sides tells the story |
Yep, this is why when the OP keeps banging on about technical football people question whether he's actually just talking guff. | |
| |
| Really poor for 80mins... technical concerns again on 09:53 - Jan 29 with 636 views | chicoazul |
A better technical side??? Are you mad??? |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
