| Harry Wright deemed not good enough, then? 15:30 - Dec 2 with 1759 views | BLUEBEAT |
21 now, isn’t he...? |  |
| |  |
| Harry Wright deemed not good enough, then? on 15:34 - Dec 2 with 1733 views | itfcjoe |
Got a couple of years left on contract so too early to say |  |
| |
| Harry Wright deemed not good enough, then? on 15:34 - Dec 2 with 1734 views | MrTown |
I don't think he is tall enough. Not sure he's good enough either. [Post edited 2 Dec 2019 15:35]
|  |
| |
| Harry Wright deemed not good enough, then? on 16:49 - Dec 2 with 1582 views | Pilgrimblue |
| Harry Wright deemed not good enough, then? on 15:34 - Dec 2 by MrTown |
I don't think he is tall enough. Not sure he's good enough either. [Post edited 2 Dec 2019 15:35]
|
Not sure he's any shorter than his dad. Keepers don't reach their best till they're mid 20s but can see him going elsewhere. |  | | |
| Harry Wright deemed not good enough, then? on 17:00 - Dec 2 with 1548 views | town8710 |
| Harry Wright deemed not good enough, then? on 16:49 - Dec 2 by Pilgrimblue |
Not sure he's any shorter than his dad. Keepers don't reach their best till they're mid 20s but can see him going elsewhere. |
Warms ups at PR he looks very decent great agility. But he seems to have lost 3rd slot to pryzbec |  | | |
| Harry Wright deemed not good enough, then? on 17:01 - Dec 2 with 1545 views | PhilTWTD |
| Harry Wright deemed not good enough, then? on 17:00 - Dec 2 by town8710 |
Warms ups at PR he looks very decent great agility. But he seems to have lost 3rd slot to pryzbec |
He's been injured, not sure whether he's fit again, although he wasn't visibly hobbling when I saw him at the training ground the other day. |  | | |
| Harry Wright deemed not good enough, then? on 22:08 - Dec 2 with 1254 views | Terry_Nutkins |
| Harry Wright deemed not good enough, then? on 15:34 - Dec 2 by MrTown |
I don't think he is tall enough. Not sure he's good enough either. [Post edited 2 Dec 2019 15:35]
|
Think he's 6ft. The guy we were linked with is 5ft 11. I really hate a short keeper. They can have great ability but it's such a disadvantage.
Richard Wright was 6ft 2. | |
| |
| Harry Wright deemed not good enough, then? on 08:17 - Dec 3 with 1026 views | itfcjoe |
| Harry Wright deemed not good enough, then? on 22:08 - Dec 2 by Terry_Nutkins |
Think he's 6ft. The guy we were linked with is 5ft 11. I really hate a short keeper. They can have great ability but it's such a disadvantage.
Richard Wright was 6ft 2. |
He might be 6ft in heels, looking at him I'd say he is about 5'9 and very slight - needs to fill out but if he does could end up similar to Pickford in size and that doesn't hold him back | |
| |
| Harry Wright deemed not good enough, then? on 08:20 - Dec 3 with 1013 views | Meadowlark |
Height? Laurie Sivell
Age? David Martin |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Harry Wright deemed not good enough, then? on 08:24 - Dec 3 with 1004 views | bournemouthblue |
| Harry Wright deemed not good enough, then? on 16:49 - Dec 2 by Pilgrimblue |
Not sure he's any shorter than his dad. Keepers don't reach their best till they're mid 20s but can see him going elsewhere. |
Probably later than that to be fair
A lot of players drop down and come back up, look at Nick Pope for example |  |
| |
| Harry Wright deemed not good enough, then? on 08:24 - Dec 3 with 999 views | solemio |
| Harry Wright deemed not good enough, then? on 08:20 - Dec 3 by Meadowlark |
Height? Laurie Sivell
Age? David Martin |
Laurie's short stature really was a major disadvantage. He was a great reaction saver and outstanding in indoor 5-a-side.
Nice story the Martin one. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
