Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) 12:59 - Apr 26 with 6706 views | MaySixth | | |
| | |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:00 - Apr 26 with 5360 views | Bluefish | Hopefully just some sort of loyalty gesture | |
| |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:01 - Apr 26 with 5346 views | IpswichKnight | Probably so PL can see if it's worth offering a new contract to Gerks or not. | | | |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:04 - Apr 26 with 5330 views | PJH | That is a question that could have been answered with "why shouldn't he be?" for most of this season. I think it is starting to look like only one of them will be here next season and maybe PL is still undecided which one. | | | |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:11 - Apr 26 with 5285 views | chicoazul |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:01 - Apr 26 by IpswichKnight | Probably so PL can see if it's worth offering a new contract to Gerks or not. |
Gerken is off in the summer. Anyone who was going to get an extension or new offer has already had it offered to them. Source; HP | |
| |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:16 - Apr 26 with 5261 views | Whymarkmariner |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:04 - Apr 26 by PJH | That is a question that could have been answered with "why shouldn't he be?" for most of this season. I think it is starting to look like only one of them will be here next season and maybe PL is still undecided which one. |
One thing we do know is when Bart's good he's good, Gerken's never been better than average. Sometimes it's forgotten that even the best have a blip. Look at David de Gea at the moment.Would Gerken suffice if Town were offered a decent wedge for Bart ? But then if we did get promotion then we'd have to look for another keeper because in my opinion Gerken is not reliable enough. Sadly this is but one of the reasons we are where we are because players have either been injured, not been good enough or lost form all at the same time. | | | |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:33 - Apr 26 with 5207 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:01 - Apr 26 by IpswichKnight | Probably so PL can see if it's worth offering a new contract to Gerks or not. |
Were the 8 games he played under Lambert in December and January not enough to decide that then? | |
| |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:34 - Apr 26 with 5205 views | ITFC_Forever | Couple of possible reasons.... either: - PL hasn't decided who he'll keep. - PL has decided Gerken is on his way and is giving him an opportunity to show what he can do. | |
| |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:37 - Apr 26 with 5192 views | No9 |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:16 - Apr 26 by Whymarkmariner | One thing we do know is when Bart's good he's good, Gerken's never been better than average. Sometimes it's forgotten that even the best have a blip. Look at David de Gea at the moment.Would Gerken suffice if Town were offered a decent wedge for Bart ? But then if we did get promotion then we'd have to look for another keeper because in my opinion Gerken is not reliable enough. Sadly this is but one of the reasons we are where we are because players have either been injured, not been good enough or lost form all at the same time. |
Yes, if Bart can recover form he would be an ideal GK for any team aspiring promotion from Div 3 to Div 2. DG isn't good enough now and if Bart can't recover then a new GK is a must as part of re-developing the spine of the team | | | | Login to get fewer ads
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:51 - Apr 26 with 5151 views | TractorCam | Because Bart will be sold and we will be seeing if Gerken is worth a new contract. | |
| |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:52 - Apr 26 with 5142 views | Bluefish |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:51 - Apr 26 by TractorCam | Because Bart will be sold and we will be seeing if Gerken is worth a new contract. |
I can answer that for you now | |
| |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:55 - Apr 26 with 5126 views | TractorCam |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:52 - Apr 26 by Bluefish | I can answer that for you now |
Bart - championship club Gerken - yes I presume? | |
| |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:56 - Apr 26 with 5122 views | textbackup |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:11 - Apr 26 by chicoazul | Gerken is off in the summer. Anyone who was going to get an extension or new offer has already had it offered to them. Source; HP |
gerken has been offered a contract, with a £6k hit per week, source - absolute watertight, but cant say more than that | |
| |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:58 - Apr 26 with 5103 views | Bluefish |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:55 - Apr 26 by TractorCam | Bart - championship club Gerken - yes I presume? |
I think there is a good chance Bart will stay. Whether he does or doesn't we need better than Gerken. | |
| |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 14:02 - Apr 26 with 5083 views | Kieran_Knows |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:56 - Apr 26 by textbackup | gerken has been offered a contract, with a £6k hit per week, source - absolute watertight, but cant say more than that |
Bloomin' eck! Think we could do with freshening the keepers up to be honest. | |
| |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 14:07 - Apr 26 with 5060 views | muccletonjoe |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 14:02 - Apr 26 by Kieran_Knows | Bloomin' eck! Think we could do with freshening the keepers up to be honest. |
i would freshen up the whole defence new goalie wolfy and ndaba kenlock and a new right back | | | |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 14:08 - Apr 26 with 5056 views | textbackup |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 14:02 - Apr 26 by Kieran_Knows | Bloomin' eck! Think we could do with freshening the keepers up to be honest. |
same here. I may have worded that wrongly, im not sure a deal has been 100% offered but on last discussions that figure was bound about (£4k a week) | |
| |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 14:08 - Apr 26 with 5052 views | TractorCam |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:58 - Apr 26 by Bluefish | I think there is a good chance Bart will stay. Whether he does or doesn't we need better than Gerken. |
Bart is too good for league 1 and will get a better deal somewhere else, he will definitely be off. Gerken I agree but I can't see us offloading both keepers as then we need to bring in another 2. | |
| |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 14:49 - Apr 26 with 4935 views | chicoazul |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:56 - Apr 26 by textbackup | gerken has been offered a contract, with a £6k hit per week, source - absolute watertight, but cant say more than that |
Nope. | |
| |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 14:55 - Apr 26 with 4900 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 14:08 - Apr 26 by textbackup | same here. I may have worded that wrongly, im not sure a deal has been 100% offered but on last discussions that figure was bound about (£4k a week) |
He’s on £10k a week?! Not convinced by that, based on what I’ve heard re other players contracts | |
| |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 14:57 - Apr 26 with 4893 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:51 - Apr 26 by TractorCam | Because Bart will be sold and we will be seeing if Gerken is worth a new contract. |
He’s 33 years old and played 300+ senior games including 9 under Lambert who has managed him for 6 months If Lambert doesn’t know by know if he’s worth a contract or not then heaven help us [Post edited 26 Apr 2019 15:21]
| |
| |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 14:58 - Apr 26 with 4882 views | Deano69 |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:56 - Apr 26 by textbackup | gerken has been offered a contract, with a £6k hit per week, source - absolute watertight, but cant say more than that |
Theres some pretty big drops in weekly salary across the board | |
| |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 15:09 - Apr 26 with 4849 views | textbackup |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 14:55 - Apr 26 by C_HealyIsAPleasure | He’s on £10k a week?! Not convinced by that, based on what I’ve heard re other players contracts |
I dont mind what you believe, all I know is the source is watertight. So ive no reason to not believe it | |
| |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 15:17 - Apr 26 with 4822 views | Bluefish |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 15:09 - Apr 26 by textbackup | I dont mind what you believe, all I know is the source is watertight. So ive no reason to not believe it |
Source must be Richard Wright Everyone knows that plugs are watertight | |
| |
on 15:20 - Apr 26 with 4816 views | _ |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 13:01 - Apr 26 by IpswichKnight | Probably so PL can see if it's worth offering a new contract to Gerks or not. |
| | | |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 15:49 - Apr 26 with 4726 views | chicoazul |
Why is Gerken starting over Bialkowski? (n/t) on 15:09 - Apr 26 by textbackup | I dont mind what you believe, all I know is the source is watertight. So ive no reason to not believe it |
There is no way in all of Hell's creation that Gerken, a second choice Championship keeper at a club with a 17m players wage budget, is on 500 grand. | |
| |
| |